Learn the גמרא דף ח: בעי מיניה רמי בר חמא ((four lines from bottom of the Amud) until “איתיביה” (bottom of the Amud)
Question:
Is Rav Chisda saying his ruling according to the reasoning of קורה משום מחיצה or קורה משום היכר?
Bring a proof from Rashi
Learn ריטב”א
Rashi “דף ח: “לדברי המתיר says the closure created by the outer face plate of the Korah is not connected to the Mavui.
Question:
Why can’t we consider it connected to the Mavui through the concept of Lavud?
Learn רשב”א
Learn the גמרא דף ח: “איתיביה until דף ט. “רב אשי אמר (nine lines from top of the Amud)
Question:
Is רב אדא בר מתנה asking only on Rava who rules the Korah needs to be resting on top of the walls of the Mavui or also on Rav Chisda who rules according to opinion of קורה משום מחיצה the inner face plate of the Korah needs to be flush to the walls of the Mavui?
See תוס’ ישנים (on side of the Gemara)
See ח’ ר”ן
Continue learning the גמרא דף ט. “רב אשי אמר until “תני ר’ זכאי (fourteen lines from top of the Amud)
Learn תוס’ דף ט. “שאין
Questions:
Why do we need both concepts of חבוט and לבוד to connect the Korah to the walls of the Mavui. Why can’t we consider the Korah connected through לבוד alone?
What is the shape of the pegs that are holding up the Korah?
The Rambam says that Moshiach will build the Beis Hamikdash. How does the Rambam answer the question of Rashi and Tosfos of how could the Beis Hamikdash be built at night?
Learn הערות על מס’ סוכה דף מא. “לא צריכא for an answer
See ערוך לנר מא. “אי נמי (starting from paragraph “וגם בזה יש ליישב) for a different answer.
Learn ערוך לנר “אי נמי for a novel explanation of the Gemara different than Rashi and Tosfos that the third Beis Hamikdash will not descend from heaven
Learn הערות על מס’ סוכה דף מא. “לא צריכא and “אי נמי (From Hagaon Rav Eliyashiv zt”l)
See שולחן ערוך אורח חיים ס’ ק”פ סעיף ה that states there is a minhag to remove metal knives from table before birchas hamazon. See משנה ברורה ס”ק יא for the two reasons for the above minhag.
Why are the knives not removed on Shabbos and Yom tov?
Learn הערות על מס’ סוכה דף מא. “אי נמי (From Hagaon Rav Eliyashiv zt”l) for a reason based on our Gemara
Question:
What is the reason of Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak why it is prohibited to eat Chodosh (the new wheat) until after the entire 16th day of Nissan?
According to which reason do we conclude lhalacha?
See שולחן ערוך אורח חיים ס’ תפ”ט סעיף י and משנה ברורה ס”ק מ”ט and ביה”ל “אף בזמן הזה
What is the difference between Tosfos and the Ritva answers?
Rava holds the Korah must be placed straight and not on an angle because a Korah is just considered a היכר and placing a Korah on an angle is not a היכר.
Major Question:
Tosfos תוס’ “מניח asked according to Rav Kahana how could it be permitted to carry along the border of the Korah even opposite the long wall as there are only two walls blocking in this part of the Mavui and need minimum of three walls to make it a reshus hayachid. Tosfos first answer is according to Rav Kahana Korah is Mechitza and therefore there really are three walls.
Rava explains his position that one must place the Korah on straight from the edge of the short wall and parallel to the opposite wall to the edge of the long wall because קורה משום היכר and if place the Korah on an angle its not a היכר
Why doesn’t Rava just simply say the reason is קורה משום היכר and therefore if place the Korah on an angle from the short side to the long side you will only have two walls?
According to Rava if one places the Korah on an angle from the edge of the short wall to the edge of the long wall would it be permitted to carry in the back part of the Mavui from the inside of the short wall?
See ביאור הלכה ס’ שס”ג סע’ ל “אינו מניח who brings a dispute between the Machatzits Hashekel and Pri Megadim regarding this.
See מחצית השקל ס’ שס”ג ס”ק ל for his Chidush and the פרי מגדים משבצות זהב ס”ק כא who argues and based on his position answers the major question we asked above.
Major Question:
How could the Machatzitz Hashekel permit carrying in the back part of the Mavui Tosfos clearly says if one can not carry opposite the long wall than its considered outside the mavui and the korah is considered placed outside the mavui therefore the Korah should not be able to allow one to carry inside any part of the mavui?
Learn the גמרא דף ח: “איבעיא להו מהו להשתמש תחת הקורה until “איתיביה (bottom of the Amud)
Question:
Why is it definitely prohibited to carry in the area opposite the Lechi?
Learn תוס’ “הכל (first half of Tosfos until “דהא אביי )
The Rishonim give other explanations.
Learn רשב”א דף ח: “אמר רב חסדא
Learn תוס’ ריד דף ט for a chidush in how Lechi operates as a Mechitza
Learn קרן אורה דף ט. “תני ר’ זכאי who adds an understanding in the operation of Lechi as a Mechitza
Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Learn the Gemara דף מ: “תניא כוותיה until the Mishna דף מא
Questions:
If one can not redeem produce from it’s kedushas shevis than how could the Gemara on דף לט instruct of one accidentally purchased fruits from an Am Haaretz on shmita the purchaser should redeem the kedusha from the money on to fruits in his home?
Learn תוספת “אין and תוספות דף לט. “מעות
Conclusion of Sugya of Sheviis
Clarify in conclusion how and when kedushas sheviis can be transferred or removed
Question:
In the time when there is no Beis hamikdash one may redeem thousands of dollars worth of fruits of maaser sheni onto a lesser value coin.
According to ר’ אלעזר when one redeems kedushas sheviis can a large amount of produce be redeemed on to a lesser value coin?
Bring a proof from רש”י דף מא. “והא הכא
In conclusion:
Does a lulav that grew during shmita have kedushas sheviis? (מחלוקת רש”י לפ’ מש’ של רמב”ם)
Does an Esrog that was picked during shemitah have kedushas sheviis?
See ח’ מנחת שלמה דף מ who discusses at length whether produce grown for a mitzvah and not for consumption is considered having kedushas sheviis.
What is the difference between Tosfos and the Ritva answers?
Rava argues and holds the Korah must be placed straight and not on an angle. The gemara says the reason is because a Korah on an angle is not a היכר.
Why doesn’t the gemara simply say the reason is קורה משום היכר and therefore if place the Korah on an angle from the short side to the long side you will only have two walls?
What is the difference between Tosfos and the Ritva answers?
Rava argues and holds the Korah must be placed straight and not on an angle. The gemara says the reason is because a Korah on an angle is not a היכר.
Why doesn’t the gemara simply say the reason is קורה משום היכר and therefore if place the Korah on an angle from the short side to the long side you will only have two walls?
Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Learn the Gemara דף מ: “תניא כוותיה until the Mishna דף מא
Questions:
If one can not redeem produce from it’s kedushas shevis than how could the Gemara on דף לט instruct of one accidentally purchased fruits from an Am Haaretz on shmita the purchaser should redeem the kedusha from the money on to fruits in his home?
Learn תוספת “אין and תוספת דף לט. “מעות
Conclusion of Sugya of Sheviis
Clarify in conclusion how and when kedushas sheviis can be transferred or removed
Question
In the time when there is no Beis hamikdash one may redeem thousands of dollars worth of fruits of maaser sheni onto a lesser value coin.
According to ר’ אלעזר when one redeems kedushas sheviis can a large amount of produce be redeemed on to a lesser value coin?
Bring a proof from רש”י דף מא. “והא הכא
In conclusion:
Does a lulav that grew during shmita have kedushas sheviis? (מחלוקת רש”י לפ’ מש’ של רמב”ם)
Does an Esrog that was picked during shemitah have kedushas sheviis?
See ח’ מנחת שלמה דף מ who discusses at length whether produce grown for a mitzvah and not for consumption is considered having kedushas sheviis.
Learn the Gemara דף מ: “תניא כוותיה until דף מא. “אמר רב אשי (third line from top of the Amud)
Very quickly review the גמרא דף ח. “גופא אמר רב ירמיה בר אבא (two dots) until דף ח: “איתמר (five lines from top of the Amud)
Rashi דף ח: “ולרבה has the words “ואפילו בחצר” in parentheses.
Point to Consider:
Does a חצר מפולש have the same halacha as a מבוי מפולש?
See the מהרש”ל & מהרש”א & מהרש”א מהדורא בתרא (underneath the מהרש”א) who discuss why the חצר should also be prohibited.
Last week we learnt the גמרא דף ח. “מרימר פסיק לה לסורא באוזלי. Rashi learnt מרימר placed the nets on the end of the street before the sea. However the מגיד משנה explained according to the Rambam who rules we are not concerned for שמא יעלה הים שרטון the case was that מרימר placed the nets on the other open side of the street.
Question on the מגיד משנה:
Rabbi Jaffe asked me the following question on Shabbos.
What was the need to place nets – a full wall on the fourth side as since the sea wall is a valid wall than this road is a classic dead end mavui which only requires a Lechi or Korah on the fourth side?
For a novel explanation see בית מאיר ס’ שס”ג סע’ כט
Learn the גמרא דף ח: “איתמר מבוי העשוי כנדל until “אמר רב כהנא בר תחליפא”
Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Learn the Gemara דף מ: “אמר ר’ אלעזר (fifth line from top of the Amud) until תניא כוותיה”
Questions:
If one can not redeem produce from it’s kedushas shevis than how could the Gemara on דף לט instruct of one accidentally purchased fruits from an Am Haaretz on shmita the purchaser should redeem the kedusha from the money on to fruits in his home?
Learn תוספת “אין and תוספת דף לט. “מעות
According to ר’ אלעזר when one redeems kedushas shiviis does the money or item used for redeeming need to be the same value as the produce being redeemed?
We pasken in the time when there is no Beis hamikdash one may redeem thousands of dollars worth of fruits of maasar sheini onto a lesser value coin.
According to ר’ אלעזר when one redeems kedushas shiviis can a large amount of produce be redeemed on to a lesser value coin?
Bring a proof
Learn the Gemara דף מ: “תניא כוותיה until דף מא. “אמר רב אשי (third line from top of the Amud)
Learn the גמרא דף ח. “ההוא מבוי עקום (middle of the Amud) until the next set of two dots.
Continue learning the Gemara until דף ח: “איתמר (five lines from top of the Amud)
Last week we learnt the גמרא דף ח. “מרימר פסיק לה לסורא באוזלי. Rashi learnt מרימר placed the nets on the end of the street before the sea. However the מגיד משנה explained according to the Rambam who rules we are not concerned for שמא יעלה הים שרטון the case was that מרימר placed the nets on the other open side of the street.
Question on the מגיד משנה:
Rabbi Jaffe asked me the following question on Shabbos.
What was the need to place nets – a full wall on the fourth side as since the sea wall is a valid wall than this road is a classic dead end mavui which only requires a Lechi or Korah on the fourth side?
For a novel explanation see בית מאיר ס’ שס”ג סע’ כט
