Is the oil Muktza to move or just prohibited to use?
Learn מהרש”א on Tosfos
According to ר”ש is the oil that drips out while the lantern is still burning just Muktza in regards to using the oil or also Muktzah for moving? – learn גליון הש”ס on Tosfos
List the different reasons why the oil is Muktzah and the נפקא מינה between the reasons
Learn משנה דף מד and the גמרא until “אבל כוס קערה ועששית (middle of the Amud)
See תשובה מהגאון ר’ משה פיינשטיין in back of Sefer Muktzah from Rabbi Pinchas Bodner אות לב
See שמירת שבת כהלכתו פרק כח הערה נט
The גמרא דף מד concludes that טלטול מן הצד for the purpose of moving the Muktzah item is prohibited. However in a case where there is a dead body in a house that’s on fire one may move the body.
Question:
Is the special permission given to move the body directly or just by using טלטול מן הצד?
How do we conclude lhalacha in regards to moving Muktzah through טלטול מן הצד?
The שו”ע ס’ שי”א סע’ ח makes a distinction between moving for the purpose of the Muktzah item (prohibited) or for the non Muktza item (permitted) – לצורך דבר המותר או לדבר האסור
What is the logic of this distinction; Either indirect movement is considered movement or it is not considered movement, how does the intent of the movement affect the permissibility?
There are two approaches to explain this
1. Review שו”ע ס’ ש”ט סע’ ד, with the משנה ברורה ס”ק יד and the שער הציון ס’ ש”ט אות יז who gives a reason for the distinction
The Chazon Ish (above) argues on the leniency of moving Muktzah with ones body for the purpose of the Muktzah item.
How does the Chazon Ish explain
The Mishna which permits moving straw with ones back?
See תשובה מהגאון ר’ משה פיינשטיין in back of Sefer Muktzah from Rabbi Pinchas Bodner אות לב
See שמירת שבת כהלכתו פרק כח הערה נט
The גמרא דף מד concludes that טלטול מן הצד for the purpose of moving the Muktzah item is prohibited. However in a case where there is a dead body in a house that’s on fire one may move the body.
Question:
Is the special permission given to move the body directly or just by using טלטול מן הצד?
And the שו”ע ס’ שי”א סע’ ח which makes a distinction between moving for the purpose of the Muktzah item (prohibited) or for the non Muktza item (permitted) – לצורך דבר המותר או לדבר האסור
The Shulchan Aruch also permits טלטול בגופו even for the purpose of the Muktzah item.
What is the logic of this distinction; Either indirect movement is considered movement or it is not considered movement, how does the intent of the movement affect the permissibility?
Learn שו”ע ס’ ש”ט סע’ ד, with the משנה ברורה ס”ק יד and the שער הציון ס’ ש”ט אות יז who gives a reason for the distinction
Learn חזון איש ס’ מז ס”ק יב-יד who 1. gives a different reason for the distinction and argues on the Shulchan Aruch. 2. Argues on the leniency of moving Muktzah with ones body for the purpose of the Muktzah item.
1. The distinction between moving for the purpose of the Muktzah item (prohibited) or for the non Muktza item (permitted) – לצורך דבר המותר או לדבר האסור?
2. The Mishna which permits moving straw with ones back?
See משנה ברורה ס’ ש”ח ס”ק יג which permits טלטול בגופו
