What is the point of dispute between ר”ש & רבי אליעזר בן רבי שמעון in regards to the oil that drips out of the lantern while the flame is still burning?
What is the point of dispute between ר”ש & רבי אליעזר בן רבי שמעון in regards to the oil that drips out of the lantern while the flame is still burning?
The שו”ע ס’ שי”א סע’ ח makes a distinction between moving for the purpose of the Muktzah item (prohibited) or for the non Muktza item (permitted) – לצורך דבר המותר או לדבר האסור
What is the logic of this distinction; Either indirect movement is considered movement or it is not considered movement, how does the intent of the movement affect the permissibility?
There are two approaches to explain this
1. Review שו”ע ס’ ש”ט סע’ ד, with the משנה ברורה ס”ק יד and the שער הציון ס’ ש”ט אות יז who gives a reason for the distinction
The שו”ע ס’ שי”א סע’ ח makes a distinction between moving for the purpose of the Muktzah item (prohibited) or for the non Muktza item (permitted) – לצורך דבר המותר או לדבר האסור
What is the logic of this distinction; Either indirect movement is considered movement or it is not considered movement, how does the intent of the movement affect the permissibility?
There are two approaches to explain this
1. Review שו”ע ס’ ש”ט סע’ ד, with the משנה ברורה ס”ק יד and the שער הציון ס’ ש”ט אות יז who gives a reason for the distinction
Explaining גמרא דף מג: “דא”ר שמואל בר יהודה until the two dots on דף מד.
Rebbe Akiva Eiger asks ( גליון הש”ס) why can’t the mattress underneath the dead person act in same way as the ככר או תינוק to allow one to move the dead person?
Explaining גמרא דף מג: “דא”ר שמואל בר יהודה until the two dots on דף מד.
Key Point:
How does placing a ככר או תינוק circumvent the issue of moving Muktzah directly?
Review גליון הש”ס on the side of our Gemara who asks why can’t the mattress underneath the dead person act in same way as the bread or baby to allow one to move the dead person?
What is the mechanism of permission to move a dead body through a ככר או תינוק according to Rebbe Akiva Eiger?
Learn רש”ש דף מג עמ’ ב who gives an answer to Rebbe Akiva Eiger question
Learn גליון הש”ס on the side of our Gemara who asks why can’t the mattress underneath the dead person act in same way as the bread or baby to allow one to move the dead person?
What is the mechanism of permission to move a dead body through a ככר או תינוק according to Rebbe Akiva Eiger?
See גליון הש”ס on the side of our Gemara who asks why can’t the mattress underneath the dead person act in same way as the bread or baby to allow one to move the dead person?
See גליון הש”ס on the side of our Gemara who asks why can’t the mattress underneath the dead person act in same way as the bread or baby to allow one to move the dead person?
How is it possible to have an item which is Muktzah but still permitted to be moved?
Summarize the three different explanations we have as to why אין כלי ניטל לדבר שאינו ניטל
According to ר’ יצחק is one permitted to cover chometz found on Pesach with a Kli?
Learn גמרא פסחים דף ו. “אמר רב יהודה אמר רב (second wide line) until אמר רבא (next line)
See Rashi
Learn תוס’ “כופה
Question:
See קובץ שיעורים פסחים אות כד who asks
Why is it considered moving the bowl for the purpose of the chometz – muktzah, the purpose for moving the bowl to cover the chometz is for the person to prevent him from accidentally eating it?
How is it possible to have an item which is Muktzah but still permitted to be moved?
Summarize the three different explanations we have as to why אין כלי ניטל לדבר שאינו ניטל
According to ר’ יצחק is one permitted to cover chometz found on Pesach with a Kli?
Learn גמרא פסחים דף ו. “אמר רב יהודה אמר רב (second wide line) until אמר רבא (next line)
See Rashi
Learn תוס’ “כופה
Question:
See קובץ שיעורים פסחים אות כד who asks
Why is it considered moving the bowl for the purpose of the chometz – muktzah, the purpose for moving the bowl to cover the chometz is for the person to prevent him from accidentally eating it?
How is one permitted to wash מים אחרונים over a bowl – as the water that washed his hands with may not be used for anything? Why is this not considered מבטל כלי מהיכנו?
How is one permitted to wash מים אחרונים over a bowl – as the water that washed his hands with may not be used for anything? Why is this not considered מבטל כלי מהיכנו?
How do the Rishonim that hold it is prohibited explain the גמרא דף קנ”ד?
What are the proofs from the גמרא דף מג that ביטל כלי לשעה is prohibited?
How does the בעל המאור who holds that ביטל כלי לשעה is permitted explain the original assumption of the Gemara that the cases of catching the flying sparks and placing a basket in front of chicks are prohibited because of ביטל כלי as these were only temporary ביטל?
According to the רשב”א that ביטל כלי לשעה is prohibited. Why is it permitted in a case of loss?
Learn ה’ אשרי על רא”ש ס’ יח
What extra chidushim do we learn from the ה’ אשרי?
How do the Rishonim that hold it is prohibited explain the גמרא דף קנ”ד?
What are the proofs from the גמרא דף מג that ביטל כלי לשעה is prohibited?
How does the בעל המאור who holds that ביטל כלי לשעה is permitted explain the original assumption of the Gemara that the cases of catching the flying sparks and placing a basket in front of chicks are prohibited because of ביטל כלי as these were only temporary ביטל?
According to the רשב”א that ביטל כלי לשעה is prohibited. Why is it permitted in a case of loss?
Learn ה’ אשרי על רא”ש ס’ יח
What extra chidushim do we learn from the ה’ אשרי?
How does the Rishonim that hold it is prohibited explain the גמרא דף קנ”ד?
What are the proofs from the גמרא דף מג that ביטל כלי לשעה is prohibited?
How does the בעל המאור who holds that ביטל כלי לשעה is permitted explain the original assumption of the Gemara that the cases of catching the flying sparks and placing a basket in front of chicks are prohibited because of ביטל כלי as these were only temporary ביטל?
According to the רשב”א that ביטל כלי לשעה is prohibited. Why is permitted in a case of loss?
Learn ה’ אשרי על רא”ש ס’ יח
What extra chidushim do we learn from the ה’ אשרי?
