Very quickly review גמרא דף כ: “א”ר יצחק בר אדא until דף כא. “אמר רב ירמיה בר אבא (sixteen lines from top of the Amud)
Questions:
If it is prohibited to draw water from the well for people to drink why is it only permitted to set up פסי ביראות surrounding a well of clean spring water that is fit for human consumption?
See רש”י “מידי
Review תוס’ דף כא. “מידי
What is the difference between the reasoning of Rashi and Tosfos
Clarify the two different opinions of Tosfos of when it is permitted to draw water for a person.
Learn מהרש”א who asks a question on Tosfos based on תוס’ יח. “בור לחוד
Why doesn’t ר’ זירא say it is forbidden to lie as the Torah instructs מדבר שקר תרחק?
Learn גמרא דף מו: “ובפלוגתא until דף מז. “ואמר ר’ יוחנן (middle of the Amud)
Questions:
Are Daled Minim Muktzah on the eighth day of Sukkos? In Eretz Yisrael? In chutz laaretz?
What about the ninth day of Sukkos in chutz laaretz?
Does one shake the Daled Minim on the eighth day?
Why should the Daled Minim be muktzah on the eighth day of they are not used?
Learn תוספת “שמיני
And תוספת מז top of the Amud
Is the wood and decorations of the Sukkah Muktzah on the eighth day of Sukkos? In Eretz Yisrael? In chutz laaretz? What about the ninth day of Sukkos in chutz laaretz?
Clarify the difference between the two לשונות of the Gemara as to what is the machlokes between רב and ר’ יוחנן
Question on Sugya of Muktzah of Daled Minim:
The Gemara דף לו עמוד ב records that ר’ יוחנן would take a couple of bites from his Esrog during Sukkos.
How was this permitted as the Esrog is Muktzah for Sukkos according to all opinions until he is finished using it in the seventh day?
Learn גמרא דף כ: “א”ר יצחק בר אדא until דף כא. “אמר רב ירמיה בר אבא (sixteen lines from top of the Amud)
Questions:
If it is prohibited to draw water from the well for people to drink why is it only permitted to set up פסי ביראות surrounding a well of clean spring water that is fit for human consumption?
Conclusion of Sugya – Holding a pail of water for an animal which is only partially inside a Reshus Hayachid to drink.
Questions:
Do we conclude l’halacha like the לישנא קמא or the לישנא בתרא?
The Gemara did not resolve the question of either the the לישנא קמא or the לישנא בתרא. How do we conclude l’halacha in regards to the unresolved question?
Review גמרא דף כ: “איכא דאמרי until “ת”ש גמל” (nine lines from bottom of the Amud)
Please chart the position of the לישנא קמא and it’s inquiry and the position of the לישנא בתרא and it’s inquiry.
Questions:
Does the proof the Gemara brings in the ת”ש answer the inquiry of the לישנא בתרא?
What is the difference between the first version and second version of the discussion of needing the head and majority of the animal inside a Reshus to give it drink?
How do we conclude l’halacha?
Learn מאירי
Learn רמב”ם הלכות שבת פרק יג הלכה כט.
What is the difference between the ruling of the מאירי and the רמב”ם?
Learn גמרא דף כ: “איכא דאמרי until “ת”ש גמל” (nine lines from bottom of the Amud)
Question:
What is the difference between the first version and second version of the discussion of needing the head and majority of the animal inside a Reshus to give it drink?
Review גמרא דף כ. “מותר להקריב לבאר (two dots – four lines from bottom of the Amud) until דף כ: “איכא דאמרי
(See yesterday’s forwarded email for the two attachments of Maareh Mekomos)
Questions:
The Gemara inquires whether an animals head and majority of its body needs to be within the area of the Reshus Hayachid when giving it water to drink.
Why does the Gemara need to introduce this question with the halacha of when a person standing in a Reshus Harabim leans over into a Reshus Hayachid and drinks?
See קרן אורה
What violation are we concerned will be transgressed when giving animal standing in Reshus Harabim whose head is inside a Reshus Hayachid if not holding on to the head of the animal?
If person holds the pail of water and moves his hand out to the Reshus Harabim he still does not violate the melacha of hotzah as he never placed the pail on the ground?
Review the line of מותר להקריב לבאר in the משנה דף יז עמוד ב with Rashi.
Learn גמרא דף כ. “מותר להקריב לבאר (two dots – four lines from bottom of the Amud) until דף כ: “איכא דאמרי
Questions:
The Gemara inquires whether an animals head and majority of its body needs to be within the area of the Reshus Hayachid when giving it water to drink.
Why does the Gemara need to introduce this question with the halacha of when a person standing in a Reshus Harabim leans over into a Reshus Hayachid and drinks?
See קרן אורה (attached)
What violation are we concerned will be transgressed when giving animal standing in Reshus Harabim whose head is inside a Reshus Hayachid if not holding on to the head of the animal?
If person holds the pail of water and moves his hand out to the Reshus Harabim he still does not violate the melacha of hotzah as he never placed the pail on the ground?
Learn ריטב”א דף מו: “מיהו ודאי ליתא who also discusses different ages of a child and the ability to gift him the Daled Minim.
Learn the first paragraph of the ריטב”א דף מו: “מאי טעמא who brings two opinions whether one can gift the Daled Minim to a child as a מתנה על מנת להחזיר.
What is the point of argument between the two opinions brought in the Shulchan Aruch?
See ביאור הלכה “לא יתננו
According to the Rambam / first opinion in the Shulchan Aruch the regifting of the Daled Minim from the child to the adult is only valid מדרבנן.
Why doesn’t a קנין דרבנן work even מדאורייתא as the rabanan through the power of הפקר ב”ד הפקר has the ability to transfer possession of assets?
(See פרי מגדים אשל אברהם אות ח. This is a major discussion in the gedolei achronim see אבני מלואים ס’ כ”ח ס”ק לג, מחנה אפרים הלכות משיכה ס’ ב, דבר אברהם ס’ א אות יז )
