The Gemara concludes in the case חצר נפרצה לים it is prohibited to draw from the water but permitted to carry inside the Chatzer as long as there are גידודי. Rashi explains גידודי is a wall under the water.
Major Question:
If the wall that is being covered by the water is good enough to allow one to carry inside the Chatzer why does it not also allow one to draw from the water?
Very quickly review the “גמרא דף יב. “אמר רב ששת (middle of the Amud) until “אמר רב יוסף” (fifth line of the medium sized lines)
Clarify the different opinions of what is required to permit carrying in a Chatzer.
Learn “ריטב”א “מרוח אחת who asks multiple questions on Rashi’s explanation of the Rabanan. The Ritva argues on Rashi and gives a different explanation in what is the opinion of the Rabanan.
Continue learning the Gemara from “אמר רב יוסף” (fifth line of the medium sized lines) until the two dots on top of דף יב עמוד ב
Learn the “גמרא דף יב. “אמר רב ששת (middle of the Amud) until “אמר רב יוסף” (fifth line of the medium sized lines)
Clarify the different opinions of what is required to permit carrying in a Chatzer
Learn “ריטב”א “מרוח אחת who asks multiple questions on Rashi’s explanation of the Rabanan. The Ritva argues on Rashi and gives a different explanation in what is the opinion of the Rabanan.
ery quickly review the גמרא דף יא: “ר’ אליעזר אומר (two dots – three lines from bottom of the Amud) until דף יב. “אמר מר (twelve lines from top of Amud)
Questions:
What is the meaning of ר’ אליעזר response “יסתום ומה בכך”?
The Gemara quotes the opinion of רשב”ג that ב”ש agrees to ב”ה when the width of a Mavui is less than four Amos only a Lechi is required.
What connection does this have to the question the gemara asked whether ר’ אליעזר requires just two lechi’s or also a Korah?
How does the Gemara conclude as to what is opinion of ר’ אליעזר?
Learn “ח’ ר”ן דף יב. “אי who addresses these questions (emailed the attachment yesterday)
Continue learning the Gemara until דף יב. “אמר רב ששת (middle of the Amud)
Continue learning the גמרא דף יב. “אמר רב ששת (middle of the Amud) until “אמר רב יוסף (fifth line of the medium sized lines)
Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Learn the Gemara “דף מד. “א”ל אביי (seven lines from the top of the Amud) until אלא אמר רב זביד
The Gemara presents three answers as to why Aravos (Hoshanos) are only taken one day זכר למקדש even though in the Beis Hamikdash aravos were taken all seven days of Sukkos.
Questions:
In the first proposed answer does Rava believe that indeed there is a Mitzvah to take aravos all seven days of Sukkos זכר למקדש?
In the final answer of the Gemara why does the fact that there is no Mitzvah from the Torah to take aravos outside of the Beis Hamikdash affect the decision of instituting a mitzvah of Aravah all seven days זכר למקדש as was done in the Beis Hamikdash?
Continue learning the גמרא דף יא: “ר’ אליעזר אומר (two dots – three lines from bottom of the Amud) until דף יב. “אמר רשב”ג (four lines from top of Amud)
Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Very quickly review “גמרא מג: “ואלא לידחו (three lines from bottom of the Amud) until “דף מד. “א”ל אביי (seven lines from the top of the Amud)
Questions:
Why does there need to be a uniform practice both in chutz laaretz and Eretz Yisrael?
Learn “רש”י דף מד. “לדידהו who explains because the prohibition of לא תתגודדו – having groups performing mitzvos differently as it gives the appearance of two religions.
The גמרא יבמות דף יג:-יד states that לא תתגודדו is only an issue according to אביי when there are different practices in one city and according to רבא even in one city it is acceptable if there are two different ruling courts (שתי בתי דין) which explains how on Purim there are different days for reading the Megillah (see תוספת שם “כי & רא”ש ס’ ט)
So how could Rashi say there is an issue of לא תתגודדו to have chutz laaretz have different practice than Eretz Yisrael when they are two different regions?
Major Questions:
According to the Gemara, only after the destruction of the Beis Hamikdash did they institute a universal rule regarding taking Hoshanos on Hashanah Rabbah that coincides with Shabbos.
During the time of the Beis Hamikdash why was this not an issue of לא תתגודדו?
What changed after the destruction of the beis hamikdash that created an issue of people in chutz laaretz doing things differently than the Jews in Eretz Yisrael?
Why isn’t the keeping of a second day of Yom tov in chutz laaretz an issue of לא תתגודדו?
Continue learning the Gemara “דף מד. “א”ל אביי (seven lines from the top of the Amud) until אלא אמר רב זביד
Question:
What’s the final answer of the Gemara as to why Aravos (Hoshanos) are only taken one day זכר למקדש even though in the Beis Hamikdash aravos were taken all seven days of Sukkos?
