Online Shiurim

Category: Gemara

5775 / Brachos / Gemara / Rabbi Gershon West's Shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 49B: Amar Rav Idi Bar Avin Amar Rav Amram Amar Rav Nachman Amar Shmuel… (12/11/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”4060″]

Download Here

Begin on 49b, 7 lines from the top, amar Rav Idi. Learn the gemara until the mishna. See tosfos dh eeh and dh Rabbi Meir until the ninth line of tosfos. Regarding the gemara that says that one does not have to repeat benching if he forgets yaleh veyavoh on Rosh Chodesh, see Rambam hilchos Brachos perek 2 halacha 13. See Hagayos Maymonis on the bottom os 7 that discusses repeating on Chanukah and Purim. See Eimek Bracha (page 62 os 3) for a discussion of this. Regarding the discussion of benching on a kazayis, is that a chiyuv min hatorah or derabanan? See Shulchan Aruch siman 184 sif 6 and siman 197 sif 4.

Brachos49B

5775 / Gemara / Makkos / Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 23A: Amar Rav Sheishes… (12/10/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”4162″]

Download Here

Review .גמרא כג from “ואמר רב ששת ” (second wide line) until the two dots of “והקורא קורא ” (middle of the עמוד)

Questions:
  • Why does someone who speaks or listens to לה”ר , or testifies falsely deserving to be thrown to the dogs?  ( מאירי, & מהרש”א )

Continue learning the גמרא until the משנה

Makkos23A

5775 / Brachos / Gemara / Rabbi Gershon West's Shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 49A to 49B: Amar Raba bar Bar Chona Amar Rav Yochanan… (12/09/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”4037″]

Download Here

Begin on 49a at the two dots, 15 lines down. Learn until 49b, 7 lines from the top, amar Rav Idi bar Avin. Learn tosfos dh lomer and dh baruch. On the first gemara that discusses saying malchus in hatov vehameitiv, not in the bracha of bonei yerushlayim, why would one not say malchus where it belongs, in the bracha of bonei yerushalayim? Tosfos dh lomer should answer this point. Rabeinu Yonah on 36a dh aydi says another reason. What is a nafka minah between the two reasons? On tosfos dh baruch, there is a very obvious question on tosfos that can be found in the Mahrsha. See carefully Rashi on the top of 49b dh vehadar that says what one repeats if he forgets to mention shabbos in bentching. See Rambam hilchos brachos perek 2 halacha 12 with the Ravaad that brings a machlokes about this.

Brachos49A

Brachos49B

5775 / Gemara / Makkos / Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: End of Mishna “Keitzad Malkin”: ViIm Meis… and Gemara: Mai Taima… (12/08/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”4041″]

Download Here

Very quickly review last : משנה כב

Questions:
  • Why is the מלקה exempt when the נלקה dies due to the lashes? (See רש”י ח.  “ושליח ב”ד)
  • When the מלקה adds an extra lash resulting in the death of the נלקה the  מלקה go to גלות. Why? גלות is only for an accident, and this is negligence? (See ריבן , ריטב”א )  (Extra See רמב”ם רוצח ה,ו & ה’ ראב”ד

Continue learning .גמרא כג until the two dots of “והקורא קורא ” (middle of the עמוד)

Questions:
  • What is the case of מבזה המועדים ? (See רש”י, רמב”ם ה’ יו”ט ו, טז-יז )
  • Why is being מבזה המועדים like עובד עכו”ם ? ( see  רמב”ם above &, מהרש”א, and מאירי )

Makkos22B

Makkos23A

5775 / Brachos / Gemara / Rabbi Gershon West's Shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 49A: Tanu Rabannan Mahu Choseim BiBinyan Yerushalayim (12/04/2014)

[jwplayer mediaid=”4004″]

Download Here

Begin on 49a, at the two dots, 16 lines from the top, tanu Rabanan. Learn until yasiv Rabbi Zeirah, 7 lines from the bottom. See Rashi carefully in dh chutz mizu that brings two girsas to explain the gemara that answers the question from mekadeish hashabbos veyisroel vehazmanim. See also Rif on 36a that brings the gemara with the girsa of the Bahag. See Rabbeinu Yonah in dh amar lay that explains. Another question on the gemara is why does the gemara first ask from mekadeish yisroel vehazmanim and answers and then asks the same question from Rosh chodesh and answers the same. What was nischadesh to the gemara to ask from Rosh Chodesh after the gemara already said the previous answer. See the peirush of Rabbi Eliezer Moshe Horowitz in the back of the gemara that discusses this. See tosfos dh lomer with Maharsha.

Brachos49A

5775 / Gemara / Makkos / Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22B: Mishna Over Aveira, Gemara ViHaTanya and Mishna Kama Malkin… (12/03/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3990″]

Download Here

Very quickly review :גמרא כב from second set of two dots until the משנה.

Questions:

According to the ריב”ן

  • What is the חילק between being reevaluated on the same day as the first evaluation or on a later date?
  • Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes if there was an underestimation in the original evaluation ?
  • Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes when the reevaluation is done on a later date and its clear he can endure the full amount contrary to the original evaluation which said he can only endure part of the 39?

Continue learning the משנה and גמרא including the second משנה until the bottom of the עמוד

Point to ponder:
  • When the נלקה is evaluated that he can endure 42 lashes we consider it as getting 2 sets if lashes.
  • Is this only for one action that is a violation of 2 לאוין or even for 2 individual violations of 2 לאוין ?  See ערל”נ

Questions:

  • Why does the חזן  rip the shirt of the נלקה ? See ריטב”א
  • When the מלקה adds an extra lash resulting in the death of the נלקה the  מלקה go to גלות. Why? גלות. Is only for an accident? This is negligence? (See ריבן , ריטב”א )

Makkos22B

5775 / Gemara / Makkos / Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22B: Rabi Yehuda Omer Arbaim Shleimos…: Amar R’ Yitzchak Mai Taima DiRabi Yehuda… (12/01/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3973″]

Download Here

Learn :גמרא כב from first set of two dots until  משנה.

Question:
According to the ריב”ן
  • What is the חילק between being reevaluated on the same day as the first evaluation or on a later date?
  • Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes if there was an underestimation in the original evaluation ?
  • Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes when the reevaluation is done on a later date and its clear he can endure the full amount contrary to the original evaluation which said he can only endure part of the 39?
Point to ponder:
  • According to רבי יהודה when the נלקה can only endure part of the 39 lashes would he still receive one or more lashes בין כתיפיו?
  • According to רבי יהודה when the נלקה can only endure 20 lashes, will he receive 2 lashes בין כתיפיו?  (The ערל”נ “דכתיב” and “אשר” discusses these two questions)

Continue learning the משנה and גמרא until the second משנה on the עמוד

Makkos22B

5775 / Brachos / Gemara / Rabbi Gershon West's Shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 48B to 49A: Tanu Rabanan Minayin LiBirchas Hamazon Min HaTorah… (11/27/14)

 

 [jwplayer mediaid=”3947″]

Download Here

Begin on 48b, Rebbi omer, 21 lines before the end of the amud. Learn until the two dots on 49a, 16 lines down from the top. The gemara says that saying bris and torah in the second bracha of benching is required. If one forgets bris and torah, is he required to repeat benching? See Biur Halacha siman 187 sif 3 dh machzirin. See also Ritva here on 49a dh vehamilah that discusses this. If one finished the second bracha of benching without bris and torah and realized his mistake before beginning the next bracha, what should he do now? See Shaar Hatzion on the bottom of the Mishna Brura siman 187 sk 8. Is there room to take issue with his proof from yaleh veyavoh?

Brachos48B

Brachos49A

5775 / Gemara / Makkos / Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22B: Mai Taima Ee Ksiv Arbaim BiMispar… (11/26/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3923″]

Download Here

Very quickly review .משנה כב and :גמרא כב until first set of two dots.

The ראשונים seem to give an entirely different reason then the גמרא
why we only give 39 lashes when the תורה says 40 (See ריטב”א , and רמב”ם ה’ סנהדרין י”ז,א )

Questions:

  • How can they give a different reason then the גמרא?
  • What is a נפקא מיניה between the explanations? (See “ערוך לנר “בצרו )
  • Why does רש”י דברים כ”ה,ג give a different explanation then the גמרא ?
Continue learning the גמרא until the next משנה
Question:
  • Our גמרא says a ת”ח is greater then a ס”ת. Learn “גמרא קידושין לג. “איבעיא  which seems to say just the opposite. ( ר” ן שם  and מהרש”א here in Makkos )

Makkos22B

5775 / Brachos / Gemara / Rabbi Gershon West's Shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 48B: Amar Rav Nachman Moshe Tikein LiYisrael Birchas Hazan… (11/25/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3910″]

Download Here

Begin on 48b, amar Rav Nachman, 7 lines from the top of the amud. Learn the gemara until the two dots 3 lines from the bottom. See carefully Rashi dh ubeshabbos and tosfos dh maschil. See Rif on 35b beginning from the first wide line amar Rav Nachman until tanya on the third line from the bottom that argues on this Rashi regarding what the addition is for Shabbos. See also Rambam hilchos berachos perek 2 halacha 5 that does not say like the Rif. See Mishnah Berurah siman 188 sif 4 to see how we pasken on this. Regarding the gemara that learns Birchas Hatorah out of a kal vechomer, does this mean that birchas hatorah is a bracha mideoraysah? See Maharsha in chidushei aggados dh kal vechomer (ko”ch).

Brachos48B