Category: Gemara
Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 49A: Tanu Rabannan Mahu Choseim BiBinyan Yerushalayim (12/04/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”4004″]
Begin on 49a, at the two dots, 16 lines from the top, tanu Rabanan. Learn until yasiv Rabbi Zeirah, 7 lines from the bottom. See Rashi carefully in dh chutz mizu that brings two girsas to explain the gemara that answers the question from mekadeish hashabbos veyisroel vehazmanim. See also Rif on 36a that brings the gemara with the girsa of the Bahag. See Rabbeinu Yonah in dh amar lay that explains. Another question on the gemara is why does the gemara first ask from mekadeish yisroel vehazmanim and answers and then asks the same question from Rosh chodesh and answers the same. What was nischadesh to the gemara to ask from Rosh Chodesh after the gemara already said the previous answer. See the peirush of Rabbi Eliezer Moshe Horowitz in the back of the gemara that discusses this. See tosfos dh lomer with Maharsha.
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22B: Mishna Over Aveira, Gemara ViHaTanya and Mishna Kama Malkin… (12/03/14)
[jwplayer mediaid=”3990″]
Very quickly review :גמרא כב from second set of two dots until the משנה.
Questions:
According to the ריב”ן
-
What is the חילק between being reevaluated on the same day as the first evaluation or on a later date?
-
Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes if there was an underestimation in the original evaluation ?
-
Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes when the reevaluation is done on a later date and its clear he can endure the full amount contrary to the original evaluation which said he can only endure part of the 39?
Continue learning the משנה and גמרא including the second משנה until the bottom of the עמוד
Point to ponder:
- When the נלקה is evaluated that he can endure 42 lashes we consider it as getting 2 sets if lashes.
- Is this only for one action that is a violation of 2 לאוין or even for 2 individual violations of 2 לאוין ? See ערל”נ
Questions:
-
Why does the חזן rip the shirt of the נלקה ? See ריטב”א
-
When the מלקה adds an extra lash resulting in the death of the נלקה the מלקה go to גלות. Why? גלות. Is only for an accident? This is negligence? (See ריבן , ריטב”א )
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22B: Rabi Yehuda Omer Arbaim Shleimos…: Amar R’ Yitzchak Mai Taima DiRabi Yehuda… (12/01/14)
[jwplayer mediaid=”3973″]
Learn :גמרא כב from first set of two dots until משנה.
Question:
According to the ריב”ן
- What is the חילק between being reevaluated on the same day as the first evaluation or on a later date?
- Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes if there was an underestimation in the original evaluation ?
- Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes when the reevaluation is done on a later date and its clear he can endure the full amount contrary to the original evaluation which said he can only endure part of the 39?
Point to ponder:
- According to רבי יהודה when the נלקה can only endure part of the 39 lashes would he still receive one or more lashes בין כתיפיו?
- According to רבי יהודה when the נלקה can only endure 20 lashes, will he receive 2 lashes בין כתיפיו? (The ערל”נ “דכתיב” and “אשר” discusses these two questions)
Continue learning the משנה and גמרא until the second משנה on the עמוד
Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 48B to 49A: Tanu Rabanan Minayin LiBirchas Hamazon Min HaTorah… (11/27/14)
[jwplayer mediaid=”3947″]
Begin on 48b, Rebbi omer, 21 lines before the end of the amud. Learn until the two dots on 49a, 16 lines down from the top. The gemara says that saying bris and torah in the second bracha of benching is required. If one forgets bris and torah, is he required to repeat benching? See Biur Halacha siman 187 sif 3 dh machzirin. See also Ritva here on 49a dh vehamilah that discusses this. If one finished the second bracha of benching without bris and torah and realized his mistake before beginning the next bracha, what should he do now? See Shaar Hatzion on the bottom of the Mishna Brura siman 187 sk 8. Is there room to take issue with his proof from yaleh veyavoh?
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22B: Mai Taima Ee Ksiv Arbaim BiMispar… (11/26/14)
[jwplayer mediaid=”3923″]
Very quickly review .משנה כב and :גמרא כב until first set of two dots.
The ראשונים seem to give an entirely different reason then the גמרא
why we only give 39 lashes when the תורה says 40 (See ריטב”א , and רמב”ם ה’ סנהדרין י”ז,א )
Questions:
-
How can they give a different reason then the גמרא?
-
What is a נפקא מיניה between the explanations? (See “ערוך לנר “בצרו )
-
Why does רש”י דברים כ”ה,ג give a different explanation then the גמרא ?
Continue learning the גמרא until the next משנה
Question:
- Our גמרא says a ת”ח is greater then a ס”ת. Learn “גמרא קידושין לג. “איבעיא which seems to say just the opposite. ( ר” ן שם and מהרש”א here in Makkos )
Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 48B: Amar Rav Nachman Moshe Tikein LiYisrael Birchas Hazan… (11/25/14)
[jwplayer mediaid=”3910″]
Begin on 48b, amar Rav Nachman, 7 lines from the top of the amud. Learn the gemara until the two dots 3 lines from the bottom. See carefully Rashi dh ubeshabbos and tosfos dh maschil. See Rif on 35b beginning from the first wide line amar Rav Nachman until tanya on the third line from the bottom that argues on this Rashi regarding what the addition is for Shabbos. See also Rambam hilchos berachos perek 2 halacha 5 that does not say like the Rif. See Mishnah Berurah siman 188 sif 4 to see how we pasken on this. Regarding the gemara that learns Birchas Hatorah out of a kal vechomer, does this mean that birchas hatorah is a bracha mideoraysah? See Maharsha in chidushei aggados dh kal vechomer (ko”ch).
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22A to 22B: Amar Rav Hoshiya… (11/24/14)
[jwplayer mediaid=”3879″]
Learn .גמרא כב from “אמר רב הושעיא ” (three lines before the משנה) until the משנה
Question:
- What is the כלאים in the case of שור פסולי מוקדשין ? (Three explanations ריב”ן “המרביע”, תוס’ ” שהרי”, ריטב”א “אמר )
Learn משנה and :גמרא כב until first set of two dots.
The גמרא explains why we only give 39 lashes when the תורה says 40 from the way the תורה writes the order of the words in the פסוק.
Learn the ראשונים who seem to give an entirely different reason then the גמרא
See ריטב”א , and רמב”ם ה’ סנהדרין י”ז,א
Points to ponder:
-
How can they give a different reason then the גמרא?
-
What is a נפקא מיניה between the explanations?
– On previous גמרא:
The גמרא concludes משנה does not hold of איסור כולל .
- So how could יו”ט be חל on שמיטה?
- How could נזיר be חל on כהן?
Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 48A: Amar Rav Yehuda Brai DiRav Shmuel bar Shilas… (11/20/14)
[jwplayer mediaid=”3894″]
Begin on 48A, at the two dots 9 lines from the top. Learn until amar Rav Nachman on 48B, 7 lines from the top. See tosfos dh tishah that discusses if one can be mitztaref a person that ate only vegetables to a zimun of three and if that is considered different from a zimun of ten. See also the opinion of the Rif (page 35b beginning from the third line from the top in the Rif). Is there an opinion in the gemara that holds that four vegetable eaters cannot be mitztaref to a zimun because we need a rov deminkar? See gemara that says “shisha vaday lo mibaye lee”. See Rashi dh he’ihu and the mesores hashas on the margin of the gemara that brings a different girsa. This will help explain the last few words in tosfos and the Rif that say that a rov deminkar is required. See Mishna Brura in siman 197 sif 2 and 3 for the halacha.
