Online Shiurim

Category: Gemara

5775 / Gemara / Makkos / Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 21B: Aisevei Abaye… (11/12/2014)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3779″]

Download Here

Learn :גמרא כא from “איתביה אביי ” (end of the first wide line) until the first set of two dots on . דף כב
Learn “ריטב”א כא: “אמר רבא explains the case of אין חילוק מלאכות ביו” ט
Learn “ערוך לנר כב. “משום הבערה

Question:
  • Why does the  גמרא not ask to add on מלקות for working land on שביעית ? Learn “ריטב”א כא: “ולילקי

Makkos21B

5775 / Brachos / Gemara / Rabbi Gershon West's Shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 47B: Maaser Sheini ViHekdish Shenifdu: Pshita Hucha Bimai Askinan… (11/11/2014)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3770″]

Download Here

Begin on 47b, at the two dots on the second line, maaser sheini. Learn until the fifth wide line, veamar Rav Yehoshua. See tosfos dh amar Rav Huna. See Rosh siman 20 from the beginning of the piece until tanu Rabanan maaseh that discusses being mezaman with a am haaretz. See Meiri dh am haaretz gamur. See Shulchan Aruch siman 199 sif 3 with Mishna Brurah with Biur Halacha that discusses whether ine may be mezamen with someone that does aveiros.

Brachos47B

5775 / Gemara / Makkos / Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 21B: Amar Lei Ulla LiRav Nachman… (11/10/2014

[jwplayer mediaid=”3750″]

Download Here

Learn :גמרא כא from “אמר ליה עולא ” (four lines before the wide lines) until דף כב. “א”ל  (end of seventh line)

Questions:
  • Why does the  גמרא not ask to add on מלקות for working land on שביעית ? See ריטב”א
  • Why does the  גמרא not ask to add on מלקות for violating יום כיפור ? See שאגת אריה
  • How could “רש”י “ואין חילוק say case is one violated two or three melochos בהעלם אחד .  Big problem: העלמה is used in context for culpability of a קרבן  , but there is no קרבן for violating יום טוב ?

Makkos21B

5775 / Brachos / Gemara / Rabbi Gershon West's Shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 47A: Rav U’Shmuel Havi Yusvee BiSudusa… (11/06/2014)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3711″]

Download Here

Begin on 47a, rav uShmuel haveh, 24 lines from the bottom of the amud. Learn until 47b, at the two dots achal tevel, on the second mid size line. See tosfos dh ilu, dh hilchasa and dh amar Rav Huna on amud beis. On the first gemara that discusses making a zimun with someone that joins at the very end, is this a chiyuv or voluntary? See Rabeinu Yonah at the beginning of the very first piece in the perek that brings a machlokes.  On the gemara that discusses not making a zimun with a am haretz, see Rosh at the beginning of siman 20. See Meiri on 47b dh am haretz gamur (on page 89). See the halacha in Mishnah Brurah siman 199 sif 3 with Mishnah Brurah and Biur Halacha dh am haretz.

brachos47A

5775 / Gemara / Makkos / Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 21B: Yaish Choreish Telem Echas (11/05/2014)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3699″]

Download Here

Learn ” גמרא כא: “יש חורש until ” אמר ליה עולא ” (four lines before the wide lines)

Questions:
What is the case of המקיים כלאים?
How could ר”ע hold המקיים כלאים is חייב מלקות but it’s a לאו שאין בו מעשה ?  Learn “תוס’ ד: “הא and for an answer.

Learn  רש”י מועד קטן ב: “אף
How does רש”י answer the question above?
Makkos21B

5775 / Brachos / Gemara / Rabbi Gershon West's Shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 47A: Tanu Rabanan Ayn Onin… (11/04/2014)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3685″]

Download Here

Begin on 47a, at the two dots halfway down the amud, tanu rabanan ayn onin. Learn until the two dots ten lines from the bottom, maaser rishon. See Rashi and tosfos dh amen, dh kol and dh ilu. Regarding Rashi and Tosfos’s question about amen yesomah from Alexandria, see Rabeinu Yonah on 34B dh ayn onen that says another answer to this question. See Rambam hilchos brachos perek 1 halacha 14 that alludes to an answer to this question. See Chidushei Reb Aryeh Leib cheilek 1 siman 5, specifically dh venireh dezeh, that explains the Rambam. On the gemara Rav and Shmuel that one can be mitztaref to a zimun as long as the two original members are still able to eat, is this a chiyuv zimun or a reshus? See Rashi dh achilnah and the first three lines of the first Rabeinu Yonah in the perek (32a dh shlosha). See also Biur halacha siman 197 sif 1 dh mitzaref.

brachos47A

5775 / Gemara / Makkos / Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 21B: In Depth Discussion of Machlokes Rav Bibi and Rav Ashi Regarding Klayim (11/03/2014)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3663″]

Download Here

Review very quickly  “גמרא כא: “אמר רב ביבי until the two dots

Questions:

According to רב אשי a person is חייב מלקות for just leaving the כלאים on himself for a certain amount of time.
  • Why? This is a לאו שאין בו מעשה which the רבנן hold אין לוקין ? Learn the “נמוקי יוסף ” אפ’ לא שהה (bottom of the ריף) and  “ריטב”א “אמר רב ביבי
  • Is the ריטבא explanation the same as the נמוקי יוסף ?
  {Extra – Last week we discussed does רב ביבי disagree with רב אשי ? See ” תוס’ שבועות יז. “א  Does רב אשי disagree with רב ביבי  ? (See ערוך לנר) }
Learn next גמרא until ” אמר ליה עולא ” (four lines before the wide lines)
Questions:
  • How could ר”ע hold המקיים כלאים is חייב מלקות but its a לאו שאין בו מעשה ?  See תוס’ ד: “הא for an answer.
Learn רש” י מועד קטן ב: “אף.
  • How does  רש” י  answer this question?

5775 / Brachos / Gemara / Rabbi Gershon West's Shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Gershon West: Brachos 46B to 47A: Tanu Rabanan… (10/30/2014)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3644″]

Download Here

Begin on 46b, on the last line, tanu Rabanan. Learn until 47a, 15 lines from the bottom, achal demai. See tosfos dh ayn on 46b  and dh ayn on 47a until the third narrow line. Regarding the gemara that discusses being not being mechabed on derachim, see Rambam hilchos Brachos perek 7 halacha 12 that mentions kovod on entering a building but doesn’t mention kovod leaving the building. See the last line of the Kesef Mishna. See also Ohr Someach on this halacha of the Rambam that discusses this. Regarding the gemara that discusses not eating before the one who makes the bracha, what is the reason, is it because otherwise one will not be yotzei with the bracha, or because of derech eretz. After learning tosfos on 47a dh ayn there should be some clarity on this question.