Review the גמרא דף ו. “ורב חנן בר רבא (middle of the Amud) until the two dots (six lines from bottom of the Amud)
Clarify what case רב הונא agrees the size of פירצה on side wall could be 10 Amos. What is the explanation for the different circumstances that affect the allowance of the size of פירצה on side wall
A Pirtza in the front of the side wall corner is only allowed to be 3 tefachim yet if the Pirtza is in the front corner it’s allowed to be up to 4 tefachim. What’s the explanation for the difference? See רשב”א And רש”ש And מהרש”א And תוס’ רבינו פרץ
Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Review גמרא דף לח: “הוא אומר ברוך הבא (middle of the Amud) until דף לח: “אמר רבא (three lines from the bottom of the Amud)
Rashi says if a person is in middle of silent shmoneh esrei and the Shat”z is saying kedusha or kadish he should pay attention to the words and it will be considered a Sid he responded through the concept of שומע כעונה
Learn תוספת “שמע ולא ענה who asks a question on Rashi from the גמרא ברכות Questions: How does Rashi answer Tosfos question from the Gemara in Brachos? Learn ר”ן דף יט: דפי הריף “וכתב רש”י (third line from top of the Amud) What is the point of disagreement between Rashi and Tosfos? See קהילת יעקב ברכות ס’ י”ב אות ב for two possible explanations. The second explanation is based on a fundamental חקירה in how the concept of שומע כעונה operates. Learn ריטב”א “הוא אומר ברוך who gives a different explanation as to why שומע כעונה does not help for the individual who is middle of his silent shmoneh esrei.
List of cases to consider whether one can utilize the concept of שומע כעונה If one physically can not respond as he is mute? If one based on halacha reason can not respond for example, dirty diaper in front of him, needs to use the restroom … ?
How do we conclude lhalacha if a person is in middle of silent shmoneh esrei and the Shat”z is saying kedusha or kadish do we rule like Rashi or Tosfos? See שולחן ערוך אורח חיים ס’ ק”ד סעיף ז
List of cases to consider whether one can utilize the concept of שומע כעונה If one physically can not respond as he is mute? See שולחן ערוך יורה דעה ס’ א סעיף ז If one based on halacha reason can not respond for example, dirty diaper in front of him, needs to use the restroom … ? See שולחן ערוך אורח חיים ס’ ק”ד סעיף ז ביאור הלכה “ויהיה כעונה
The Shulchan Aruch ס’ רי”ג says that in order to be מוציא through שומע כעונה the person needs to be a בר חיובא Questions: Our Gemara says the source for שומע כעונה is when Shafan read the Torah in front of Yoshiayahu. What was Yoshiayahu obligation to read from the Torah?
Very quickly review the גמרא דף ה: “אמר רב חנן בר רבא (two dots on bottom of the Amud) until אמר רב נחמן בר יצחק (nine lines from top of the Amud)
Questions: What is the reason why רב הונא says the allowed size of a פירצה on side wall is only up to 4 Tefachim and not 10 Amos ? Why does this reason not apply to the front wall at the entrance to the Mavui? Review “תוס’ ו. “אחד (second half) See גמרא דף ה. “איתמר משמיה דרב אמי ורב אסי (middle of the Amud) until “לרב יוסף Learn רש”י דף ה carefully
Learn ריטב”א דף ו. “רב הונא אמר אחד זה https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37287&st=&pgnum=9 According to the Ritva that רב הונא halacha applies even to the front wall at the entrance to the Mavui the reason Tosfos says for רב הונא does not apply. What is the Ritva explanation of the opinion of רב הונא?
Learn the גמרא דף ה: “אמר רב נחמן בר יצחק ((nine lines from top of the Amud) until the two dots (six lines from bottom of the Amud) (Focus on the argument of רב חנן בר רבא and רב הונא for the size of פירצה on side wall – we will come back to the Sugya of מבוי עקום after we finish this topic) Clarify what case רב הונא agrees the size of פירצה on side wall could be 10 Amos. What is the explanation for the different circumstances that affect the allowance of the size of פירצה on side wall Why does בקעי בה רבים decrease the allowance for the opening? See משנה ברורה שס”ה ס”ק י, שעה”צ אות ח
Very quickly review the גמרא דף ה: “אמר רב חנן בר רבא (two dots on bottom of the Amud) until אמר רב נחמן בר יצחק ((nine lines from top of the Amud)
Questions: What is the reason why רב הונא says the allowed size of a פירצה on side wall is only up to 4 Tefachim and not 10 Amos ? Why does this reason not apply to the front wall at the entrance to the Mavui? Review “תוס’ ו. “אחד (second half) See גמרא דף ה. “איתמר משמיה דרב אמי ורב אסי (middle of the Amud) until “לרב יוסף Learn רש”י דף ה carefully
Learn ריטב”א דף ו. “רב הונא אמר אחד זה https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37287&st=&pgnum=9 According to the Ritva that רב הונא halacha applies even to the front wall at the entrance to the Mavui the reason Tosfos says for רב הונא does not apply. What is the Ritva explanation of the opinion of רב הונא?
Continue learning the Gemara until the two dots (six lines from bottom of the Amud) (Focus on the argument of רב חנן בר רבא and רב הונא for the size of פירצה on side wall – we will come back to the Sugya of מבוי עקום after we finish this topic) Clarify what case רב הונא agrees the size of פירצה on side wall could be 10 Amos. What is the explanation for the different circumstances that affect the allowance of the size of פירצה on side wall?
Questions: Are all doorways in corners not considered פתחים? Learn “תוס’ ו. “דפתחא Learn רמב”ם הלכות שבת פרק טז הלכה כ who disagrees with Tosfos Tosfos brought a proof from the גמרא דף ה that explain the case of a Mavui with entrances from the chatzer in the corners. How does the Rambam explain that Gemara? There are multiple explanations הגהה תוס’ ר פרץ אות 221 See ריטב”א בדף ה. And הגהות רא”מ הורוויץ על תוס in the back of the Gemara
Questions: What is the reason why רב הונא says the allowed size of a פירצה on side wall is only up to 4 Tefachim and not 10 Amos ? Learn “תוס’ ו. “אחד (second half) Why does this reason not apply to the front wall at the entrance to the Mavui? Learn ריטב”א דף ו. “רב הונא אמר אחד זה https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37287&st=&pgnum=9 According to the Ritva that רב הונא halacha applies even to the front wall at the entrance to the Mavui the reason Tosfos says for רב הונא does not apply. What is the Ritva explanation of the opinion of רב הונא?
Continue learning the Gemara until the two dots (six lines from bottom of the Amud) (Focus on the argument of רב חנן בר רבא and רב הונא for the size of פירצה on side wall – we will come back to the Sugya of מבוי עקום after we finish this topic)
Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Very quickly review גמרא דף לח עמוד א from אמר רבא (last line) until דף לח: “אמר רבא (three lines from the bottom of the Amud)
The Gemara lists six halachos /minhagim of how they would read Hallel in the time of the Gemara.
The תוספת דף לח: “הלכתא notes that already in his times the reciting of Hallel was not in accordance with the minhagim of Rava and says since they were just customs if the custom was accepted to be different than no issue of not following the original custom of Rava. Question: Rashi says the first halacha/ minhag – there is a mitzvah for the public to respond the word הללויה after the Chazzan at the opening of Hallel. This applies to everyone even to people who know how to recite Hallel on their own. Why do we not follow this halacha when we recite Hallel? For an explanation learn the ר”ן דף י”ט. דפי הריף “הוא אומר הללויה https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14319&st=&pgnum=620 and ערוך לנר https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14414&st=&pgnum=148
In regard to repeating the ראשי פרקים Would the public repeat the opening line only after the Chazzan said the opening line or after each line recited by the Chazzan of that paragraph? When would the public respond with the word הללויה? Learn תוספת “מכאן שמצוה and the מאירי https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=57966&st=&pgnum=105
Questions: Rashi “הוא אומר הללו עבדי” concludes that only someone who does not know how to recite Hallel can rely on the reciting of the Chazzan by responding הללויה. What is Rashi’s source for this stringency?
Learn תוספת “שמע ולא ענה Questions: How does Rashi answer Tosfos question from the Gemara in Brachos? Learn ר”ן דף יט: דפי הריף “וכתב רש”י (third line from top of the Amud) What is the point of disagreement between Rashi and Tosfos? See קהילת יעקב ברכות ס’ י”ג who presents a חקירה in the concept of שומע כעונה Learn ריטב”א “הוא אומר ברוך who gives a different explanation as to why שומע כעונה does not help for the individual who is middle of his silent shmoneh esreh.
Learn גמרא דף ה: “אמר רב חנן בר רבא (two dots on bottom of the Amud) until אמר רב נחמן בר יצחק ((nine lines from top of the Amud) Clarify what is defined as ‘ראשו’
Learn “תוס’ ו. “מצידו
Questions: Are all doorways in corners not considered פתחים? Learn “תוס’ ו. “דפתחא
Why does רב הונא say that even a gap in the sidewall of a Mavui of only four tefachim is considered a פירצה? Learn “תוס’ ו. “אחד
How could the Rambam rule that a לחי is Kosher as long as it is not more than half the width of the Mavui. Our Gemara clearly says that if the לחי is four Amos wide it is disqualified?
How could the Rambam say when the lechi is the same size as the open space it is considered a Lechi when our gemara said when they are equal size the Mavui one is not permitted to carry in the Mavui?
See רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק ט”ז הלכה ט”ז who rules פרוץ כעומד מותר (equal closure to open space is considered a mechitza) Why does the Rambam say that when the lechi is the same size as the open space it is considered a Lechi and not valid through the concept of פרוץ כעומד מותר?
Major Questions on the Rambam: How could the Rambam rule that a לחי is Kosher as long as it is not more than half the width of the Mavui. Our Gemara clearly says that if the לחי is four Amos wide it is disqualified? How could the Rambam say when the lechi is the same size as the open space it is considered a Lechi when our gemara said when they are equal size the Mavui one is not permitted to carry in the Mavui? See רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק ט”ז הלכה ט”ז who rules פרוץ כעומד מותר (equal closure to open space is considered a mechitza) Why does the Rambam say that when the lechi is the same size as the open space it is considered a Lechi and not valid through the concept of פרוץ כעומד מותר? Learn מגיד משנה “לחי הבולט who explains how the Rambam learns the conclusion of our Gemara. But remains with a question on the Rambam Learn ח’ גרי”ז בכורות י”ז עמוד ב
Learn ח’ הג”ר משה הלוי על רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק י”ז הלכה כב (see below. One more page added below today for an explanation of the Rambam
Major Question: The Rambam rules a לחי is Kosher as long as it is not more than half the width of the Mavui. Our Gemara clearly says that if the לחי is four Amos wide it is disqualified?
Learn מגיד משנה “לחי הבולט who explains how the Ramabam learns the conclusion of our Gemara. But remains with a question on the Rambam Learn ח’ גרי”ז בכורות י”ז עמוד ב
Is there a difference in the concept of עומד מרובה to פרוץ כעומד מותר? Learn ח’ הגר” משה הלוי על רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק י”ז הלכה כב
Learn רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק י”ז הלכה כב the first line and then skip to “לחי שהיה רחב ד “ Major Question: The Rambam rules a לחי is Kosher as long as it is not more than half the width of the Mavui. Our Gemara clearly says that if the לחי is four Amos wide it is disqualified? Learn מגיד משנה “לחי הבולט who explains how the Ramabam learns the conclusion of our Gemara. But remains with a question on the Rambam Learn ח’ גרי”ז בכורות י”ז עמוד ב
Is there a difference in the concept of עומד מרובה to פרוץ כעומד מותר? Learn ח’ הגר” משה הלוי על רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק י”ז הלכה כב
