Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Quickly review the גמרא דף מב עמוד ב from after the Mishna until “אמר רבה”
Question:
Is an article that it’s functionality is exclusively for the purpose of a mitzvah (for example – lulav) considered muktzah?
We learnt “תוספת “טלטול that although it’s function is for a mitzvah since the item is not essentially a kli it is muktzah therefore Daled Minim are muktzeh on Shabbos.
We learnt a machlokes between the Rema and the Taz as to what category of muktzah is a Lulav on Shabbos of Sukkos
(See שולחן ערוך ורמ”א אורח חיים ס’ תרנ”ח סעיף ב and ט”ז ס”ק ג and משנה ברורה ס”ק ד and שער הציון אות ג)
Quickly review the גמרא דף י עמוד ב “אם יש לו צורת הפתח (two dots – four lines form bottom of the Amud) until “מתני לה” (eight lines from top of the Amud)
Sugya: אמלתרא
Major Question:
The gemara inquires whether an אמלתרא would help a Korah be a valid Tikun for a Mavui whose opening is wider than 10 Amos. The Gemara (3a) said the benefit of an אמלתרא is that it attracts attention and makes the Korah noticable therefore a Korah with an אמלתרא can be placed higher than 20 Amos. An opening wider than 10 Amos is considered a Pirtzah. How could an אמלתרא help for an opening wider than 10 Amos as the issue is entirely different?
Learn רש”י דף מב. “קא משמע לן which explains the chidush of the Mishna דף מב עמוד א that although there is no Mitzvah for women to take the Daled Minim they may still handle them on Yom Tov. Rashi explains the reason why it is not muktzah for women is since the Daled Minim are suitable for men therefore it’s considered a kli for women and are not muktzah.
Our Gemara clearly contradicts this as our Gemara says the Daled Minim are muktzah?
See הגהות גר”א שולחן ערוך אורח חיים ס ‘תרנ”ח סעיף ב “ואסור
Conclusion of אתי אוירא מהאי גיסא ואוירא מהאי גיסא ומבטלה
Question:
In the case of עור העסלא (on bottom of דף י עמוד ב) if the total width of the seat is one tefach it is an אהל לטומאה. We discussed earlier a concept of אתי אוירא מהאי גיסא ואוירא מהאי גיסא ומבטלה. Why when the space between the two solid planks is equal or larger than the solid part don’t we apply the rule of אתי אוירא? The solid part of the seat should be negated and no longer considered an אהל לטומאה ?
Learn “תוס’ “ואצבעיים who explains some principles of when we do not apply the concept of אתי אוירא מהאי גיסא ואוירא מהאי גיסא ומבטלה
Quickly review the משנה דף ב
Learn the גמרא דף י עמוד ב “אם יש לו צורת הפתח (two dots – four lines form bottom of the Amud) until “מתני לה” (eight lines from top of the Amud)
Sugya: אמלתרא
Major Question:
The gemara inquires whether an אמלתרא would help a Korah be a valid Tikun for a Mavui whose opening is wider than 10 Amos. The Gemara (3a) said the benefit of an אמלתרא is that it attracts attention and makes the Korah noticable therefore a Korah with an אמלתרא can be placed higher than 20 Amos. An opening wider than 10 Amos is considered a Pirtzah. How could an אמלתרא help for an opening wider than 10 Amos as the issue is entirely different?
See ב”ח ס’ שס”ג סעיף כו
And שפת אמת דף ג. לא תהני
How do we conclude l’halacha regarding whether an אמלתרא can help for an opening wider than 10 Amos?
Why didn’t Tosfos ask from the simpler case like the Ran?
How did Tosfos answer his question?
What changed in Tosfos answer from his original understanding?
Question:
Is the mitzvah of simchas Yom tov from the Torah exclusively with eating the meat of the korban shelomim or does it include other items that make one happy?
See wording of ר”ן
Learn one or two fo the following Tosfos תוספת מועד קטן יד: “עשה” & תוספת פסחים דף קט. “במה” & חגיגה ו. “דמחייבא
Where is it implicit that the eight days of simcha eating the meat of the korban shlamim needs to be eaten in the evening as well?
Why didn’t Tosfos ask from a simpler case; indeed every motzei Shabbos on Sukkos one can’t eat meat of the קרבן שלמים as the korban is not brought on Shabbos and the earliest it may be brought is Friday which then makes the meat prohibited to be eaten on the second night?
Learn (מהרש”ל (חכמת שלמה (underneath the מהרש”א) who gives a simple answer based on the Gemara immediately after the first Mishna דף מח
ery quickly review the “גמרא דף י: “וליחוש (seventeen lines from top of the Amud) until “תנן התם”
The gemara says we are not concerned that people will abandon the larger opening for the smaller opening unless there is a gain of a shortcut.
What happens if the people actually do abandon the larger opening?
Learn שולחן ארוך או”ח ס’ שס”ג סע’ לד with the משנה ברורה
Is the Shulchan Aruch explaining the issue of abandoning the larger opening like Rashi or the Meiri?
See
The Shulchan Aruch says placing a tzuras hapesach on the smaller opening will allow one to carry inside the mavui. Could one place a Lechi or Korah instead?
See ה’ רע”א who questions why placing a tzuras hapesach on the smaller opening will allow one to carry inside the mavui?
See משנה ברורה ס”ק ק”נ
Continue learning the גמרא דף י: “תנן התם (middle of the Amud) until the two dots.
