Category: Gemara

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: First Perek, יום חמישי Shiva Asar B’Tamuz , Daf 11b-12a (07/06/23)

Click on Right Side of Player to Download

ery quickly review the גמרא דף יא: “ר’ אליעזר אומר (two dots – three lines from bottom of the Amud) until דף יב. “אמר מר (twelve lines from top of Amud)

Questions:

What is the meaning of ר’ אליעזר response “יסתום ומה בכך”? 

The Gemara quotes the opinion of רשב”ג that ב”ש agrees to ב”ה when the width of a Mavui is less than four Amos only a Lechi is required.

What connection does this have to the question the gemara asked whether ר’ אליעזר requires just two lechi’s or also a Korah? 

How does the Gemara conclude as to what is opinion of ר’ אליעזר?

Learn “ח’ ר”ן דף יב. “אי who addresses these questions (emailed the attachment yesterday)

Continue learning the Gemara until דף יב. “אמר רב ששת (middle of the Amud)

Continue learning the גמרא דף יב. “אמר רב ששת (middle of the Amud) until “אמר רב יוסף (fifth line of the medium sized lines)

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Sukkah: Fourth Perek, Wednesday night shiur, Tamuz 17, Daf 43b-44a (07/05/23)

Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur

Learn the Gemara “דף מד. “א”ל אביי (seven lines from the top of the Amud) until אלא אמר רב זביד

The Gemara presents three answers as to why Aravos (Hoshanos) are only taken one day זכר למקדש even though in the Beis Hamikdash aravos were taken all seven days of Sukkos.

Questions:

In the first proposed answer does Rava believe that indeed there is a Mitzvah to take aravos all seven days of Sukkos זכר למקדש?

In the final answer of the Gemara why does the fact that there is no Mitzvah from the Torah to take aravos outside of the Beis Hamikdash affect the decision of instituting a mitzvah of Aravah all seven days זכר למקדש as was done in the Beis Hamikdash?

See ריטב”א “מאי שנא  https://www.sefaria.org/Ritva_on_Sukkah.44a.1?lang=bi

Learn רמב״ם הלכות לולב פרק ז הלכה כא-כב and מגיד משנה

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=287

Major Question:

The Rambam seems to offer an entirely new reason than the Gemara as to why mitzvah the of Aravah is only one day זכר למקדש?

Learn ערוך לנר for an explanation for the Rambam

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14414&st=&pgnum=171

According to אבא שאול the mitzvah of Aravah in the Beis Hamikdash is learnt from the words ערבי נחל

Learn תוספת דף לד. “ואחת who asks where in the pasuk is it indicated that it’s limited to Beis Hamikdash?

See תוספת ראש 

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14724&st=&pgnum=60

And ערוך לנר

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14414&st=&pgnum=125

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: First Perek, יום רביעי Tamuz 16, Daf 11b-12a (07/05/23)

Click on Right Side of Player to Download

Learn the גמרא דף יא: “ר’ אליעזר אומר (two dots – three lines from bottom of the Amud) until דף יב. “אמר מר (twelve lines from top of Amud)

Questions:

Is ר’ אליעזר in accordance with ב”ש or ב”ה?

See רבינו יהונתן  

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14312&st=&pgnum=330

Learn “ח’ ר”ן דף יא: “איבעיא 

What is the meaning of ר’ אליעזר response “יסתום ומה בכך”? 

The Gemara quotes the opinion of רשב”ג that ב”ש agrees to ב”ה when the width of a Mavui is less than four Amos only a Lechi is required.

What connection does this have to the question the gemara asked whether ר’ אליעזר requires just two lechi’s or also a Korah? 

How does the Gemara conclude as to what is opinion of ר’ אליעזר?

Learn “ח’ ר”ן דף יב. “אי who addresses these questions 

Continue learning the Gemara until דף יב. “אמר רב ששת (middle of the Amud)

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: First Perek, יום שלישי Tamuz 15, Daf 11b-12a (07/04/23)

Click on Right Side of Player to Download

Very quickly review the גמרא דף יא עמוד ב from after the Mishna until the two dots.

Note the גירסא change of the הגהות הגר”א (side of the Gemara) from the ר”ח

What changes in conclusion of the gemara according to the גירסא change of the גר”א

Learn רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק י”ד הלכה א

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=57

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=58

and פרק י”ז הלכה ט

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=73

And השגת ראב”ד on side of the Rambam

Questions on the Rambam:

How many walls does the Rambam rule is required to create a Reshus Hayachid? (See מגיד משנה)

How could the Rambam seemingly rule contrary to the Gemara?

Learn the מגיד משנה for an answer.

Learn מאירי who also explains the Gemara similar to the Rambam’s ruling.

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=36399&st=&pgnum=23

Continue learning the גמרא דף יא: “ר’ אליעזר אומר (two dots – three lines from bottom of the Amud) until דף יב. “אמר רשב”ג (four lines from top of Amud)

Question:

Is ר’ אליעזר in accordance with ב”ש or ב”ה?

See רבינו יהונתן

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14312&st=&pgnum=330

And ח’ ר”ן

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Sukkah: Fourth Perek, Monday night shiur, Tamuz 15, Daf 43b-44a (07/03/23)

Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur

Very quickly review  “גמרא מג: “ואלא לידחו (three lines from bottom of the Amud) until “דף מד. “א”ל אביי (seven lines from the top of the Amud)

Questions:

Why does there need to be a uniform practice both in chutz laaretz and Eretz Yisrael?

Learn “רש”י דף מד. “לדידהו who explains because the prohibition of לא תתגודדו – having groups performing mitzvos differently as it gives the appearance of two religions.  

The גמרא יבמות דף יג:-יד states that לא תתגודדו is only an issue according to אביי when there are different practices in one city and according to רבא even in one city it is acceptable if there are two different ruling courts (שתי בתי דין) which explains how on Purim there are different days for reading the Megillah (see תוספת שם “כי & רא”ש ס’ ט) 

So how could Rashi say there is an issue of לא תתגודדו to have chutz laaretz have different practice than Eretz Yisrael when they are two different regions?  

Major Questions:

According to the Gemara, only after the destruction of the Beis Hamikdash did they institute a universal rule regarding taking Hoshanos on Hashanah Rabbah that coincides with Shabbos. 

During the time of the Beis Hamikdash why was this not an issue of לא תתגודדו?

What changed after the destruction of the beis hamikdash that created an issue of people in chutz laaretz doing things differently than the Jews in Eretz Yisrael?

Why isn’t the keeping of a second day of Yom tov in chutz laaretz an issue of לא תתגודדו?

Learn רמב”ם ה’ לולב פרק ז הלכה ז and the לחם משנה

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=287

See מאירי דף מג. ” ושאל בה איננו דיי בקיבועא דירחא 

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=57966&st=&pgnum=116

And ערוך לנר יבמות דף יד 

Continue learning the Gemara “דף מד. “א”ל אביי (seven lines from the top of the Amud) until אלא אמר רב זביד

Question:

What’s the final answer of the Gemara as to why Aravos (Hoshanos) are only taken one day זכר למקדש even though in the Beis Hamikdash aravos were taken all seven days of Sukkos? 

See ריטב”א “מאי שנא https://www.sefaria.org/Ritva_on_Sukkah.44a.1?lang=bi

Learn רמב״ם הלכות לולב פרק ז הלכה י”ז-י”ח https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=287

Learn “תוספת מג: “והביאו

Learn תוספת דף לד. “ואחת

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: First Perek, יום שני Tamuz 14, Daf 11b (07/03/23)

Click on Right Side of Player to Download

Review the גמרא דף יא עמוד ב from after the Mishna until the two dots.

Questions:

What is the inference from the mishna that implies Beis Shammai requires four walls to create a Reshus Hayachid? 

Learn ריטב”א דף יא: “לימא קסברי 

Learn beginning of רשב”א דף יא: “לימא קסברי 

The Gemara seemingly concludes that according to Beis Shammai three walls are required to create a Reshus Hayachid.

And according to Beis Hillel only two walls are needed. 

Is this indeed the Halacha that only two walls are needed to create a Reshus Hayachid?

Learn ריטב”א דף יא: “הדר אמרינן 

Learn the rest of רשב”א דף יא: “לימא קסברי to explain the conclusion of the Gemara. 

Note the גירסא change of the הגהות הגר”א (side of the Gemara) 

What changes in conclusion of the gemara according to the גירסא change of the גר”א

Learn רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק י”ד הלכה א

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=57

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=58

and פרק י”ז הלכה ט

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=73

How many walls does the Rambam rule is required to create a Reshus Hayachid? (See מגיד משנה)

How could the Rambam seemingly rule contrary to the Gemara?

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: First Perek, יום חמישי Tamuz 10, Daf 11b (06/29/23)

Click on Right Side of Player to Download

Learn משנה דף יא: “הכשר מבוי 

Question:

Why does Beis Shammai require a Lechi plus a Korah?

Learn the Gemara from the Mishna until the two dots.

Questions:

What is the inference from the mishna that implies Beis Shammai requires four walls to create a Reshus Hayachid? 

Learn “ריטב”א דף יא: “לימא קסברי

Learn beginning of “רשב”א דף יא: “לימא קסברי  

The Gemara seemingly concludes that according to Beis Shammai three walls are required to create a Reshus Hayachid.

And according to Beis Hillel only two walls are needed. 

Is this indeed the Halacha that only two walls are needed to create a Reshus Hayachid?

Learn ריטב”א דף יא: “הדר אמרינן 

Learn the rest of רשב”א דף יא: “לימא קסברי to explain the conclusion of the Gemara. 

Note the גירסא change of the הגהות הגר”א (side of the Gemara) 

What changes in conclusion of the gemara according to the גירסא change of the גר”א

Learn רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק י”ד הלכה א

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=57

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=58

and פרק י”ז הלכה ט

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=73

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Sukkah: Fourth Perek, Wednesday night shiur, Tamuz 10, Daf 43b-44a (06/28/23)

Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur

Learn the “גמרא מג: “איתיביה אביי (middle of the Amud) until “דף מד. “א”ל אביי (seven lines from the top of the Amud)

Questions:

What changed after the destruction of the beis hamikdash that created an issue of people in chutz laaretz doing things differently than the Jews in Eretz Yisrael?

Rashi “מד. “לדידהו says this is an issue of לא תתגודדו but the Gemara Yevomas clearly states that לא תתגודדו is only an issue when there are different practices in one city? 

Learn “תוספת מג: “והביאו

Learn תוספת דף לד. “ואחת

Questions:

Why does there need to be a uniform practice both in chutz laaretz and Eretz Yisrael?

Learn “רש”י דף מד. “לדידהו who explains because the prohibition of לא תתגודדו – having groups performing mitzvos differently as it gives the appearance of two religions.  

The גמרא יבמות דף יג:-יד states that לא תתגודדו is only an issue according to אביי when there are different practices in one city and according to רבא even in one city it is acceptable if there are two different ruling courts (שתי בתי דין) which explains how on Purim there are different days for reading the Megillah (see תוספת שם “כי & רא”ש ס’ ט) 

So how could Rashi say there is an issue of לא תתגודדו to have chutz laaretz have different practice than Eretz Yisrael when they are two different regions?  

According to the Gemara, only after the destruction of the Beis Hamikdash did they institute a universal rule regarding taking Hoshanos on Hashanah Rabbah that coincides with Shabbos. 

During the time of the Beis Hamikdash why was this not an issue of לא תתגודדו?

What changed after the destruction of the beis hamikdash that created an issue of people in chutz laaretz doing things differently than the Jews in Eretz Yisrael?

See מאירי דף מג. ” ושאל בה איננו דיי בקיבועא דירחא 

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=57966&st=&pgnum=116

Why isn’t the keeping of a second day of Yom tov in chutz laaretz an issue of לא תתגודדו?

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: First Perek, יום רביעי Tamuz 9, Daf 11b (06/28/23)

Click on Right Side of Player to Download

Conclusion of סוגיא צורת הפתח – כיפה  – Arch 

In conclusion how do we rule as to which types of archs are considered a צורת הפתח?

Learn שולחן ארוך יו”ד ס’ רפ”ז ה’ מזוזה 

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9732&st=&pgnum=478

Learn שולחן ארוך או”ח ס’ שס”ב סע’ יב and משנה ברורה

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=55

Learn חזון איש או”ח ס’ ע”א ס”ק ג

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14336&st=&pgnum=224

Sagging Wires

Is a צורת הפתח which top wire sags (bows) kosher? 

Learn שער הציון או”ח ס’ שס”ב אות נו which quotes the opinion of משכנות יעקב ס’ קכ”ג 

Learn חזון איש או”ח ס’ ע”א ס”ק י

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14336&st=&pgnum=225

And אמרי יושר חלק ה’ ס’ קל”א 

Obstruction between Lechi & Top String

Learn ט”ז או”ח ס’ שס”ב ס”ק י”ט

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14325&st=&pgnum=230

See משנה ברורה ס’ שס”ג ס”ק קיב

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=64

And ערוך השולחן או”ח ס’ שס”ב סע’ מו

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9101&st=&pgnum=428

Question on halacha אין צריכין ליגע – side posts do not need to extend until the top crossbeam. 

Why not?

See משנה ברורה שס”ב ס”ק סב which says the reason is because of גוד אסיק

Major Question:

In the Sugya of כיפה  in the case of a doorframe which is an arched on top. The gemara says if the side posts are ten tefachim tall everyone agrees it’s considered a צורת הפתח.  Rashi says this is a proof that the side posts do not need to extend to touch the top cross beam. 

How could this be considered a צורת הפתח  through גוד אסיק , there is solid material separating the top of the side posts and the cross beam? 

See אבני נזר או”ח ס’ רס”ד which asks the rule of גוד אסיק is universal,  why does רב ששת say צריכים ליגע? 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: First Perek, יום שלישי Tamuz 8, Daf 11b (06/27/23)

Click on Right Side of Player to Download

Conclusion of סוגיא צורת הפתח – כיפה  – arch

Question: 

Why is an arched door frame which starts to arch from the bottom of the side posts not obligated in mezuzah?

Is it only when lacking width of 4 tefachim with a minimum height of 3 tefachim or is it because a door frame needs to have straight side posts and a flat lintel?

Is a doorframe which is wider than four tefachim that begins to arch from bottom of the side posts considered a צורת הפתח ?

See Rashi – Beis Yosef

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14272&st=&pgnum=469&hilite=

See רש”י דף יא עמוד ב on our sugya 

Learn ח’ ר”ן “כיפה

Learn ריטב”א “ר”מ מחייב 

Learn רמב”ם ה’ מזוזה פרק ו הלכה ד

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=58957&st=&pgnum=244&hilite=

Why does the Rambam omit the detail of minimum width of four tefachim for the doorway?

Why is a doorframe which side posts begin to arch before ten tefachim from the ground exempt from mezuzah? 

How does the Shulchan Aruch conclude?

Learn שולחן ארוך יו”ד ס’ רפ”ז 

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9732&st=&pgnum=478

Learn שולחן ארוך או”ח ס’ שס”ב סע’ יב and משנה ברורה

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=55

Learn חזון איש או”ח ס’ ע”א ס”ק ג

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14336&st=&pgnum=224

Sagging Wires

Is a צורת הפתח which top wire sags (bows) kosher? 

Learn שער הציון או”ח ס’ שס”ב אות נו which quotes the opinion of משכנות יעקב ס’ קכ”ג 

Learn

חזון איש או”ח ס’ ע”א ס”ק י

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14336&st=&pgnum=225

And אמרי יושר חלק ה’ ס’ קל”א 

Obstruction between Lechi & Top String

Learn ט”ז או”ח ס’ שס”ב ס”ק י”ט

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14325&st=&pgnum=230

See משנה ברורה ס’ שס”ג ס”ק קיב

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=64

And ערוך השולחן או”ח ס’ שס”ב סע’ מו

https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9101&st=&pgnum=428