Do parks or wooded areas larger that a בית סאתים disqualify a city eruv?
Yesterday we learnt the תוספת ישנים underneath “תוספת דף כג: “איכא and the רא”ש פרק ב’ ס’ ב “ומתוך פ’ רש”י (approximately 20 lines before end) that according to Rashi gardens only destroy דירה for a קרפף but not for a חצר
However the שולחן ערוך ס’ שנ”ח סע’ ט & י rules there is no difference.
Learn ביאור הלכה ס’ שנ”ח סע’ ט’ “אבל אם who brings a ת’ דבר שמואל for a new reason why a city eruv can include with קרפף inside of it.
Based on the above would a city eruv be permitted to include park or wooden area?
What is the reason the דבר שמואל that קרפף inside a walled city will not disqualify the Eruv?
See חכם צבי ס’ נט
And Laws of Eruvin from Rabbi Francis who quoted a different explanation in the name of Hagaon Rabbi Moshe Feinstein
Would a halachik wall made from צורת הפתח also be included in the chidush of the דבר שמואל?
Does רב ששת (who explained the opinions of ר”א and the רבנן ) disagree with רב פפא who entertains new considerations regarding splitting a courtyard and a house?
Review “גמרא דף כו: “א”ל רב פפא לאביי” (middle of the Amud) until the two dots.
Questions:
What does רב ששת (who explained the opinions of ר”א and the רבנן ) hold in regards to these new considerations being introduced whether a person lives in a house without having rights in the courtyard?
Learn “גמרא דף כו: “כמאן אזלא” (ten lines from top of Amud) until the two dots.
Questions:
What does רב ששת (who explained the opinions of ר”א and the רבנן ) hold in regards to these new considerations being introduced whether a person lives in a house without having rights in the courtyard?
In case where the person is only מבטל his rights in the courtyard. The מבטל is permitted to carry items from the other residents houses to the courtyard. However he is not allowed to carry items from his own house to the courtyard.
We learnt a Machlokes between רש”י and רבינו יהונתן
Quickly review גמרא דף נא: “במוצאי יו”ט (two dots seven lines from the bottom of the Amud) until דף נב. “האי הספידא
Question:
How does the fact that the Torah wants to keep men and women separated override the pasuk with the instruction not to alter the Beis Hamikdash from the blueprint of Dovid Hamelech?
Learn גמרא דף נב. “האי הספידא until “תנו רבנן משיח בן דוד” (middle of the Amud)
Questions:
According to the explanation that the Navi is discussing the death of the yetzer harah.
How does the Gemara answer its question as to why people are eulogizing the yetzer harah?
Learn מהרש”א
Why would it be necessary to separate men and women at the Hesped for the yetzer harah. There should be no possibility of sin now that the yetzer harah is gone?
Review “גמרא דף כו: “כשתימצי לומר (top of the Amud) until “כמאן אזלא” (ten lines from top of Amud)
Questions:
What is the point of dispute between ר”א and the רבנן in regards to being מבטל ones home, and whether one needs to specify that he is being מבטל to each individual?
According to the Rabanan –
If the person who did not participate in the Eruv was מבטל to only one of the residents of the Chatzer and then the residents made an Eruv together. Would all the residents be permitted to carry from their homes to the courtyard?
In case where the person is only מבטל his rights in the courtyard. The מבטל is permitted to carry items from the other residents houses to the courtyard. However he is not allowed to carry items from his own house to the courtyard.
Why?
Learn רש”י
Learn רבינו יהונתן who gives a different explanation than Rashi
If the other residents of the courtyard made a Chazaka after the person was מבטל his rights in the courtyard. May he now carry from his house into the courtyard?
Learn רשב”א who brings a different reason from the ראב”ד why the מבטל is not allowed to carry items from his own house to the courtyard.
How do we conclude l’halacha?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ ש”פ סע’ א and the משנה ברורה
In case where the person is also מבטל his rights in his house in addition to the courtyard. Is the מבטל permitted to carry items from his own house to the courtyard? Why or why not?
Does it matter if the other residents made a chazaka in the courtyard?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ ש”פ סע’ ב and the משנה ברורה
Can the מבטל carry items from the other residents homes to the courtyard before they made a chazaka in the courtyard?
Very quickly review “גמרא דף כו. “וכן שמעתי (two dots – four lines from bottom of the Amud) until “כמאן אזלא
The Mishna teaches us that if a Jew did not participate in the Eruv Chatzeros he can be מבטל- relinquish his rights in the Chatzer and thereby permit everyone to carry from their homes to the chatzer.
In case where the person is only מבטל his rights in the courtyard. The מבטל is permitted to carry items from the other residents houses to the courtyard. However he is not allowed to carry items from his own house to the courtyard.
Why?
Learn רש”י
Learn רבינו יהונתן who gives a different explanation than Rashi
If the other residents of the courtyard made a Chazaka after the person was מבטל his rights in the courtyard. May he now carry from his house into the courtyard?
In case where the person is also מבטל his rights in his house in addition to the courtyard. Is the מבטל permitted to carry items from his own house to the courtyard? Why or why not?
Does it matter if the other residents made a chazaka in the courtyard?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ ש”פ סע’ ב and the משנה ברורה
Can the מבטל carry items from the other residents homes to the courtyard before they made a chazaka in the courtyard?
What is the difference between the ruling of the Mechaber and the Rema?
According to the Mechaber, If someone already davened silent shemoneh esreh can he respond Amen to חזרת הש”ץ without knowing what bracha had just been said?
Learn the משנה ברורה
(Extra:
According to the first explanation of Tosfos, why is the issue of responding an אמן יתומה just in regards to a bracha one is obligated to recite?
Why is the punishment so severe for saying an אמן יתומה?
Learn גמרא דף נא: “במוצאי יו”ט (two dots seven lines from the bottom of the Amud) until דף נב. “האי הספידא
Question:
How does the fact that the Torah wants to keep men and women separated override the pasuk with the instruction not to alter the Beis Hamikdash from the blueprint of Dovid Hamelech?
According to the explanation that the Navi is discussing the death of the yetzer harah.
How does the Gemara answer it’s question as to why people are eulogizing the yetzer harah?
Learn מהרש”א
Why would it be necessary to separate men and women at the Hesped for the yetzer harah. There should be no possibility of sin now that the yetzer harah is gone?
Introduction to next Gemara – Learn משנה דף סט עמוד ב
Learn “גמרא דף כו. “וכן שמעתי (two dots – four lines from bottom of the Amud) until “כמאן אזלא
The Mishna teaches us that if a Jew did not participate in the Eruv Chatzeros he can be מבטל- relinquish his rights in the Chatzer and thereby permit everyone to carry from their homes to the chatzer.
Is it permissible for them to carry items from the מבטל house to the courtyard?
Is it permissible for the מבטל to;
Carry items from his own house to the courtyard?
Carry items from their homes to the courtyard?
Learn רש”י
Learn רבינו יהונתן who gives a different explanation than Rashi
According to the first answer of Tosfos, If you daven shemoneh esreh by yourself can you respond Amen to חזרת הש”ץ without knowing what bracha had just been said?
According to the second answer of Tosfos is it permitted to respond Amen to a bracha that one is obligated to recite when he did not hear the bracha but knows exactly which bracha had just been said?
List the נפקא מינה between the two answers of Tosfos.
