How do we conclude lhalacha? Do we rule like Rabanan or like Chanania?
Review שולחן ערוך ס’ רנ”ג סע’ א which brings two opinions.
Question:
According to which opinion does the מחבר conclude?
Bring a proof
Learn the Mishna Berura
Is the רמ”א concluding the halcha is in accordance with Chanania or saying that if one follows the accepted Minhag like Chanania it is Ok, but really should follow like Rabanan?
Learn ביאור הלכה “ונהגו להקל כסברא אחרונה And הגהות חזון איש on the ביאור הלכה who argue what is the ruling of the רא”ש
The רא”ש first brings the ruling of the רי”ף who rules like the Rabanan and all of the proofs of the רי”ף. (We went through most of those proofs when we learnt the רי”ף) The רא”ש then brings the opinion of רש”י and the ר”י who rules like Chanania.
The רא”ש then quotes the בעל המאור who also rules like Chanania and refutes all the proofs of the רי”ף (we learnt some of the refutations in the ר”ן)
The רא”ש then brings ר’ יהודה הברצלוני & שאילתות דרב אחאי גאון who rule like the רי”ף and goes through each refutation of the בעל המאור and explains why it is not a valid refutation.
In conclusion the רא”ש says “ובשביל שרבו דעות בהאי פיסקא “
Questions:
What is the רא”ש halachic conclusion? Does he rule like Chanania or really rules like the Rabanan just says one can not object to those who follow the ruling of Chanania?
Does the Rambam rule like the Rabanan or like Chanania?
How do we conclude lhalacha?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ רנ”ג סע’ א which brings two opinions how to rule.
According to which opinion does the מחבר conclude?
Bring a proof
Learn Mishna Berura
Is the רמ”א concluding to like Chanania or saying that if one follows the accepted Minhag like Chanania it is Ok, but really should follow like Rabanan?
Learn ביאור הלכה “ונהגו להקל כסברא אחרונה And הגהות חזון איש on the ביאור הלכה who argue what is the ruling of the רא”ש
The רא”ש first brings the ruling of the רי”ף who rules like the Rabanan and all of the proofs of the רי”ף. (We went through most of those proofs when we learnt the רי”ף) The רא”ש then brings the opinion of רש”י and the ר”י who rules like Chanania.
The רא”ש then quotes the בעל המאור who also rules like Chanania and refutes all the proofs of the רי”ף (we learnt some of the refutations in the ר”ן)
The רא”ש then brings ר’ יהודה הברצלוני & שאילתות דרב אחאי גאון who rule like the רי”ף and goes through each refutation of the בעל המאור and explains why it is not a valid refutation.
In conclusion the רא”ש says “ובשביל שרבו דעות בהאי פיסקא “
Questions:
What is the רא”ש halachic conclusion? Does he rule like Chanania or really rules like the Rabanan just says one can not object to those who follow the ruling of Chanania?
Does the Rambam rule like the Rabanan or like Chanania?
How do we conclude lhalacha?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ רנ”ג סע’ א which brings two opinions how to rule.
According to which opinion does the מחבר conclude?
Bring a proof
Learn Mishna Berura
Is the רמ”א concluding to like Chanania or saying that if one follows the accepted Minhag like Chanania it is Ok, but really should follow like Rabanan?
Learn ביאור הלכה “ונהגו להקל כסברא אחרונה And הגהות חזון איש on the ביאור הלכה who argue what is the ruling of the רא”ש
Review the גמרא דף לז. “איבעיא להו until “ת”ש (fifth wide line) until
גמרא דף לח. “איבעיא להו (twelve lines from bottom of the Amud) Question: Is the question of the Gemara whether סמיכה is permitted by שהייה or by חזרה? Learn תוס’ “מהו If the question of the Gemara is in regards to חזרה what is the proof from the braissa which only discusses שהייה? Learn רי”ף which brings a proof from this question that the halacha is like רבנןLearn רשב”א for a different explanation of the question of the Gemara
Clarify the three explanations of the Gemara question
1. Tosfos
2. Rif
3. Rashba
Review the first half of תוס’ “אא”ב and continue learning the rest of Tosfos
Questions:
What’s the point of argument between Rashi and Tosfos?
What compelled Rashi to explain differently than the simple explanation offered by Tosfos?
Rashi sources the איסור שהייה to הטמנה בדבר המוסיף הבל which the Gemara explains is prohibited because we are considered שמא יחתה. Tosfos argues on Rashi and says the prohibition is because שמא יחתה. How is Tosfos’ explanation different from Rashi?
According to Tosfos how does raking out the coals or placing ashes on the גפת ועצים permit one to place cooked food on the Kirah?
Learn “ר”ן “או עד שיתן האפר
List two differences between Rashi and Tosfos/ Ran in regards to הטמנה and two possible differences in regards to שהייה
According to Tosfos why is הטמנה more stringent than שהייה?
Learn “תוס’ מז: “במה
Learn ב”ח ס’ רנ”ג ס”ק י for a new explanation in Rashi
Bring a proof from Rashi דף לד: “גזירה against this explanation
Review the גמרא דף לו עמוד ב until דף לז. “ת”ש” (Eleven lines from top of the Amud)
Rashi sources the איסור שהייה to הטמנה בדבר המוסיף הבל which the Gemara explains is prohibited because we are considered שמא יחתה. Tosfos argues on Rashi and says the prohibition is because שמא יחתה. How is Tosfos’ explanation different from Rashi?
According to Tosfos how does raking out the coals or placing ashes on the גפת ועצים permit one to place cooked food on the Kirah?
Learn “ר”ן “או עד שיתן האפר
List two differences between Rashi and Tosfos/ Ran in regards to הטמנה and two possible differences in regards to שהייה
According to Tosfos why is הטמנה more stringent than שהייה?
Learn “תוס’ מז: “במה
Learn ב”ח ס’ רנ”ג ס”ק י for a new explanation in Rashi
Bring a proof from Rashi דף לד: “גזירה against this explanation
Review the גמרא דף לו עמוד ב until דף לז. “ת”ש” (Eleven lines from top of the Amud)
There are two prohibitions listed in the Mishna – שהייה & חזרה
We are going to first focus on the איסור שהייה
Questions:
What is the reason for the איסור שהייה?
See רש”י לו: “עד שיגרוף
Why does Rashi source the reason for איסור שהייה to a Gemara of איסור הטמנה (insulating)?
Learn the גמרא דף לד עמוד ב which explains the two different types of הטמנה and why each are prohibited.
According to Rashi how does גרוף או קטום remove the fact of מוסיף הבל?
Learn תוס’ דף לו: “לא
Clarify the two questions of Tosfos on Rashi
Major Question:
Rashi sources the איסור שהייה to הטמנה בדבר המוסיף הבל which the Gemara explains is prohibited because we are considered שמא יחתה. Tosfos argues on Rashi and says the prohibition is because שמא יחתה. How is Tosfos’ explanation different from Rashi?
Why does raking out the coals or placing ashes on the גפת ועצים permit one to place cooked food on the Kirah?
Learn “ר”ן “או עד שיתן האפר
Note the differences between the questions Tosfos asks in Rashi and the the questions the Ran asks on Rashi.
What is the difference between Rashi and the Ran?
Learn בית יוסף & ב”ח ס’ רנ”ג סע’ א (I will show you exact piece)
Learn the גמרא דף נו: “והני תרתי until אע”פ (seven lines before end of mesachta)
Question:
Why does the Gemara question fining the father for the actions of his daughter. The pasuk says a naarah murasah that has zenus is stoned by the door of her father’s house?
What’s the halacha implication to a kohen whose daughter commits adultery or adopts a different religion?
See מהרש”א and רש”ש
See שולחן ערוך או”ח ס’ קכח סע’ מא and מגן אברהם ס”ק סב
Questions:
Why did Bilga kick the Mizbeach?
Why did Bilga refer to the Mizbeach as a wolf?
Why does the Gemara end with the benefit of living next to a tzadik when the family the Gemara discusses were not tzadikim?