Sugya: נראה בפנים ואינו נראה מבחוץ and נראה מבחוץ ואינו נראה מבפנים
Review the גמרא דף ט: “ור’ יוחנן (eighteen lines from the top of the Amud) until “דף י. “האי ” (second line from top of the Amud)
Question:
Is the machlokes whether נראה מבחוץ is a valid Lechi dependent on the argument whether the היכר is for the people outside the Mavui or inside the Mavui?
Review גמרא דף מב: “היודע לשחוט (top of the Amud) until דף מב: “יכול לאכול כזית צלי (eighth line from top of the Amud)
Relying on קטנים for Shechita:
Learn תוספת “והיודע
Questions:
When can one rely on a קטן to perform Shechita on an animal?
Can a קטן be a Shochet?
The ר”ן asks a contradiction to our Gemara from the Mishna חולין דף ב and גמרא חולין דף מב עמוד ב which says that one may not give animals to a child to slaughter and only in the event that he did slaughter correctly as an adult was supervising may it be eaten?
The Ran reconciles the contradiction and explains that the Gemara in Chulin is dealing with a child who is unskilled at slaughtering therefore he may not be given animals to slaughter lest an error will result however our Gemara is dealing with a trained skilled minor and he may be given animals to slaughter as long as there is an adult supervising.
Learn תוספת חולין דף ב. “שמא which brings the opinion of ר”ת who argues on Rashi in Chulin and explained the Gemara in Chulin that one may not give a child an animal to slaughter when there is no adult supervision.
Sugya: נראה בפנים ואינו נראה מבחוץ and נראה מבחוץ ואינו נראה מבפנים
Review the גמרא דף ט: “ור’ יוחנן (eighteen lines from the top of the Amud) until “דף י. “האי ” (second line from top of the Amud)
Major Question:
How could a Lechi be created through Lavud when there is no post that is noticable?
Note: in Sugya of מבוי שרצפו בלחיים Rav Ashi said we view many individual Lechi as one wide Lechi through Lavud.
Question:
Is the machlokes whether נראה מבחוץ is a valid Lechi dependent on the argument whether the היכר is for the people outside the Mavui or inside the Mavui?
According to the opinion לחי משום מחיצה and חודו חיצון סותם (we consider the outer face plate of the Lechi as closing the area). How could the Lechi partially protruding outside the Mavui permit one to carry in the Mavui as there is no wall opposite the Lechi for the Lechi to connect to?
Quickly review גמרא דף מב: “היודע לשחוט (top of the Amud) until דף מב: “יכול לאכול כזית צלי (eighth line from top of the Amud)
Relying on קטנים for Shechita:
Learn “תוספות “והיודע
Questions:
When can one rely on a קטן to perform Shechita on an animal?
Can a קטן be a Shochet?
The ר”ן asks a contradiction to our Gemara from the Mishna חולין דף ב and גמרא חולין דף מב עמוד ב which says that one may not give animals to a child to slaughter and only in the event that he did slaughter correctly as an adult was supervising may it be eaten?
The Ran reconciles the contradiction and explains that the Gemara in Chulin is dealing with a child who is unskilled at slaughtering therefore he may not be given animals to slaughter lest an error will result however our Gemara is dealing with a trained skilled minor and he may be given animals to slaughter as long as there is an adult supervising.
Learn תוספות חולין דף ב. “שמא which brings the opinion of ר”ת who argues on Rashi in Chulin and explained the Gemara in Chulin that one may not give a child an animal to slaughter when there is no adult supervision.
Continue learning the Gemara until the end of the Perek.
Distancing oneself from צואת קטן:
Questions:
At what stage does the צואת קטן have the status of צואה; when the infants that age start to eat foods from the five grains or when this child personally starts to eat them?
If a child started to eat food from the five grains but them stopped for a long period of time would his צואה lose the status of צואה?
Learn טור אורח חיים ס’ פ”א סעיף א with the בית יוסף and the ב”ח
Sugya: נראה בפנים ואינו נראה מבחוץ and נראה מבחוץ ואינו נראה מבפנים
Very quickly review גמרא דף ט: “ולרבי שמעון בן גמליאל (sixth line from top of the Amud) until ור’ יוחנן (eighteen lines from the top of the Amud)
Review תוס’ דף ט: “ולרשב”ג
Tosfos asks on Rashi how could the protruding Lechi permit people to carry opposite the Lechi? This area is Reshus Harabim?
Question on Tosfos:
It seems that Tosfos understands why the Lechi permits one to carry inside the Mavui. This seems to be contradictory to the Gemara on bottom of דף ח עמוד ב which says a Korah placed outside the walls of a Mavui is invalid. So how could a Lechi placed outside the Mavui permit one to carry inside the Mavui?
According to the opinion לחי משום מחיצה and חודו חיצון סותם (we consider the outer face plate of the Lechi as closing the area). How could the Lechi partially protruding outside the Mavui permit one to carry in the Mavui as there is no wall opposite the Lechi for the Lechi to connect to?
Sugya: נראה בפנים ואינו נראה מבחוץ and נראה מבחוץ ואינו נראה מבפנים
Review גמרא דף ט: “ולרבי שמעון בן גמליאל (sixth line from top of the Amud) until ור’ יוחנן (eighteen lines from the top of the Amud)
Clarify what the case of נראה בפנים ואינו נראה מבחוץ and נראה מבחוץ ואינו נראה מבפנים looks like.
Learn תוס’ דף ט: “ולרשב”ג
Tosfos asks on Rashi how could the protruding Lechi permit people to carry opposite the Lechi? This area is Reshus Harabim?
Question on Tosfos:
It seems that Tosfos understands why the Lechi permits one to carry inside the Mavui. This seems to be contradictory to the Gemara on bottom of דף ח עמוד ב which says a Korah placed outside the walls of a Mavui is invalid. So how could a Lechi placed outside the Mavui permit one to carry inside the Mavui?
According to the opinion לחי משום מחיצה and חודו חיצון סותם (we consider the outer face plate of the Lechi as closing the area). How could the Lechi partially protruding outside the Mavui permit one to carry in the Mavui as there is no wall opposite the Lechi for the Lechi to connect to?
Continue learning the גמרא דף ט: “ור’ יוחנן (eighteen lines from the top of the Amud) until “אמר רבה בר רב הונא” (twelve lines from bottom of the Amud)
