Review גמרא דף כ: “איכא דאמרי until “ת”ש גמל” (nine lines from bottom of the Amud)
Please chart the position of the לישנא קמא and it’s inquiry and the position of the לישנא בתרא and it’s inquiry.
Questions:
Does the proof the Gemara brings in the ת”ש answer the inquiry of the לישנא בתרא?
What is the difference between the first version and second version of the discussion of needing the head and majority of the animal inside a Reshus to give it drink?
How do we conclude l’halacha?
Learn מאירי
Learn רמב”ם הלכות שבת פרק יג הלכה כט.
What is the difference between the ruling of the מאירי and the רמב”ם?
Learn גמרא דף כ: “איכא דאמרי until “ת”ש גמל” (nine lines from bottom of the Amud)
Question:
What is the difference between the first version and second version of the discussion of needing the head and majority of the animal inside a Reshus to give it drink?
Review גמרא דף כ. “מותר להקריב לבאר (two dots – four lines from bottom of the Amud) until דף כ: “איכא דאמרי
(See yesterday’s forwarded email for the two attachments of Maareh Mekomos)
Questions:
The Gemara inquires whether an animals head and majority of its body needs to be within the area of the Reshus Hayachid when giving it water to drink.
Why does the Gemara need to introduce this question with the halacha of when a person standing in a Reshus Harabim leans over into a Reshus Hayachid and drinks?
See קרן אורה
What violation are we concerned will be transgressed when giving animal standing in Reshus Harabim whose head is inside a Reshus Hayachid if not holding on to the head of the animal?
If person holds the pail of water and moves his hand out to the Reshus Harabim he still does not violate the melacha of hotzah as he never placed the pail on the ground?
Review the line of מותר להקריב לבאר in the משנה דף יז עמוד ב with Rashi.
Learn גמרא דף כ. “מותר להקריב לבאר (two dots – four lines from bottom of the Amud) until דף כ: “איכא דאמרי
Questions:
The Gemara inquires whether an animals head and majority of its body needs to be within the area of the Reshus Hayachid when giving it water to drink.
Why does the Gemara need to introduce this question with the halacha of when a person standing in a Reshus Harabim leans over into a Reshus Hayachid and drinks?
See קרן אורה (attached)
What violation are we concerned will be transgressed when giving animal standing in Reshus Harabim whose head is inside a Reshus Hayachid if not holding on to the head of the animal?
If person holds the pail of water and moves his hand out to the Reshus Harabim he still does not violate the melacha of hotzah as he never placed the pail on the ground?
Learn ריטב”א דף מו: “מיהו ודאי ליתא who also discusses different ages of a child and the ability to gift him the Daled Minim.
Learn the first paragraph of the ריטב”א דף מו: “מאי טעמא who brings two opinions whether one can gift the Daled Minim to a child as a מתנה על מנת להחזיר.
What is the point of argument between the two opinions brought in the Shulchan Aruch?
See ביאור הלכה “לא יתננו
According to the Rambam / first opinion in the Shulchan Aruch the regifting of the Daled Minim from the child to the adult is only valid מדרבנן.
Why doesn’t a קנין דרבנן work even מדאורייתא as the rabanan through the power of הפקר ב”ד הפקר has the ability to transfer possession of assets?
(See פרי מגדים אשל אברהם אות ח. This is a major discussion in the gedolei achronim see אבני מלואים ס’ כ”ח ס”ק לג, מחנה אפרים הלכות משיכה ס’ ב, דבר אברהם ס’ א אות יז )
Learn גמרא דף כ – last of the בעא מיניה אביי (thirteen lines from the top of the Amud) until אמר ר”א
Questions:
Why does the drying of the water from the well cause the loss of the mechitzas?
The גמרא דף יז bring the opinion of אביי that says “הואיל והותרה הותרה – once an area was permitted to carry inside it at the beginning of Shabbos that area retains its status for the entire Shabbos. This is in contradiction to our Gemara that says the drying of the water in middle of Shabbos removes the permission to carry inside the פסי ביראות ?
Learn תוס’ “מחיצה for an answer based on the גמרא דף יז
