Online Shiurim

Tagged: Rosh

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 30B to 31A: Mishna Aizo Hee Aveida and Gemara Utoo

We will be be”H be covering alot of ground this week.
Learn Mishna 30b & Gemara until two dots on 31a.  Learn Last 3 lines of Tosfos 25b “V’im” & first half of the Rosh on Mishna 25b “Matza”
Questions; when Braisa 31a says if something is placed for 3 days one can assume its lost does that apply to items placed near a fence as well?  See First Rashba 31a.  What is the conclusion of the gemara in regards to Hashovas aveida on land? Ritva “Mahu”
Point to ponder; According to Rava when the torah includes Hoshavas aveida on land is that just for the prohibition of “Lo suchal Lihisalem” or also for the Mitzva of ” Hashev Teshiveim”?

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 30B: DiTanee Reb Yosef (07/11/2012)

Learn Gemara 30B “Dtani Rav Yosef ” (5 lines before the 2 dots) until the Mishna  Tosfos “Lo”
Question; Are Bikur Cholim, Nichum Aveilim, & Gemilas Chesed Biblical or Rabbinic Mitzvos? (Rambam Hilchos Aveilus perek 14 halacha 1)
Learn Mishna & Gemara until bottom of the Amud

Point to ponder; Is the exemption of a Zaken to return an aveida that is beneath his dignity A) an exemption because of human dignity. Or B) an exclusion in the obligation of hashevas aveida? Bring proofs

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 30B Amar Rava Kol Shebishelo Machzir (07/09/2012)

Shiur #3 Exemption to return an Avieda if its beneath ones dignity (Mon night)

Learn Gemara 30b “Amar Rava” (11 lines from top) until the 2 dots
Question; Why did Rav Yishmael B’Reb Yose make this item hefker? Learn 1st line of Tosfos “Afkera”
Question on Tosfos; Why couldn’t Rav Yishmael B’Reb Yose just give everyone permission to use it without making it hefker?
Learn Rosh Siman 21 “Vhachachom .. (in middle of the Siman) says if a Zaken wants to go “lifnim mshuras hadin” he should pay the person for the aveida since he has no right to degrade the honor of torah. Question on the Rosh;
Why is doing the mitzva itself the greatest honor for Torah? (Biur Halacha Siman 250 Hilchos Shabbos “ki”)
Point to ponder; Is the exemption of a Zaken to return an aveida that is beneath his dignity A) an exemption because of human dignity. Or B) an exclusion in the obligation of hashevas aveida? Bring proofs
Continue learning Gemara until the Mishna

[subscribe2]

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 27B to 28A Ella Ha DiTnan (04/30/2012)

Learn Gemara 27b from “Ella ha DiTnan”  (5 lines from bottom) until 28a “Ella Amar Rava” Question; What changed from the question to the answer regarding returning a bundle of shtaros?    Learn Gemara 28a “Ella Amar Rava” until Mishna.  Question; Is the proof from bundle of Shtaros a conclusive proof that Simanim are  acceptable according to the Torah or not? Rosh Siman 13, Ritva 28a “Ella”

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 27B Ta Shema (04/16/2012)

Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 27B Ta Shema

Learn 1) Gemara 27b 3rd Ta Shma “Vhaya” until 1st wide line “Leima Ktanai”  2) Tosfos “Dorshuhu”  3) Major Question; If we are worried an object was lent and therefore do not accept Simanim there should never be a case that one could return an item since we should be concerned even if the claimant can give proper identification that the item was once his but was subsequently sold or gifted? Ritva 27a “Keilav”  4) Question; Why does the Gemara not bring a proof from the Mishna on 20a and 24b that we are not worried items were lent?  See end of Tosfos 20b “Matza”, Rosh end of First Perek Siman 50

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 27B Chaishinan (4/18/2012)

Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 27B Chaishinan

1) Major Question; If we are worried an object was lent and therefore do not accept Simanim there should never be a case that one could return an item since we should be concerned even if the claimant can give proper identification that the item was once his but was subsequently sold or gifted? Ritva 27a “Keilav”  2) Question; Why does the Gemara not bring a proof from the Mishna on 20a and 24b that we are not worried items were lent?  See end of Tosfos 20b “Matza”, Rosh end of First Perek Siman 50. 3) Learn Gemara 27b 3rd 1st wide line “Leima Ktanai” until “Amar Rava”  4) Fundemental Question (Chakira); What is the reason Simanim would not be accepted according to the Torah? Is it because we are concerned A. the person is lying, or B. there is another item with exactly the same Siman therefore the Siman is not conclusive proof to whom is the real owner? Bring a proof

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur (11/21/2011).

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-11-21/Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24B/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24B__2011-11-21.wmv”]Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24B[/popup]

Learn 1) Gem’ 24b “(2 dots) Rav Chanina… until Mishna”  2) Tosfos “Lifnim Mshuras Hadin”  Get clear the levels Tosfos delineates.  Question; Is Lifnam Nshuras Hadin optional or required? [Rosh siman 7 (in middle), Rambam Hilchos Gezaila Vavaida 11,7] 3) What do we conclude in Halacha, do we Pasken like RabanShimon ben Elazar by majority gentiles, jews? Bring proof

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur (10/31/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-31/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-10-31.wmv”] Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]

Gemara 24a “vchen haya r’ … Until Ta Shma” Major Questions; What is the reasoning of the Rabanan that the finder has to return the lost object by majority gentile?  See end of Tosfos 23a “Vha” What is the reasoning of R’ Shimon ben Elazar that the finder can keep the lost object by majority Jews?  See Tosfos “Afilu”.   Also learn Tosfos “Ki

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur (10/26/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-26/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-10-26.wmv“]Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]

Learn 1) Gemara 24a “Veilu Hein Keilim .. until Vchen Hoya ..”  Question Rashi 20b “Shtarei Machriz” explains that in regards to Minyan being a Siman, the number 2 is not an acceptable siman so how could Rashi and Tosfos here say 2 is considered a siman? (Ritva for answer)  2) Tosfos 24a “Aval”  3) Gemara “Vchen Hoya … until Ibaiyu Lahu”  Question:  Is the reasoning “The owner had Yiush” also explaining Zuto Shel Yam [Machlokes; Rosh Siman 6, & Ritva “Mipnei”] 4) Start Gemara “Ibaiyu Lahu … “