Tagged: Ritva
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 30B to 31A: Mishna Aizo Hee Aveida and Gemara Utoo
We will be be”H be covering alot of ground this week.
Learn Mishna 30b & Gemara until two dots on 31a. Learn Last 3 lines of Tosfos 25b “V’im” & first half of the Rosh on Mishna 25b “Matza”
Questions; when Braisa 31a says if something is placed for 3 days one can assume its lost does that apply to items placed near a fence as well? See First Rashba 31a. What is the conclusion of the gemara in regards to Hashovas aveida on land? Ritva “Mahu”
Point to ponder; According to Rava when the torah includes Hoshavas aveida on land is that just for the prohibition of “Lo suchal Lihisalem” or also for the Mitzva of ” Hashev Teshiveim”?
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 27B to 28A Ella Ha DiTnan (04/30/2012)
Learn Gemara 27b from “Ella ha DiTnan” (5 lines from bottom) until 28a “Ella Amar Rava” Question; What changed from the question to the answer regarding returning a bundle of shtaros? Learn Gemara 28a “Ella Amar Rava” until Mishna. Question; Is the proof from bundle of Shtaros a conclusive proof that Simanim are acceptable according to the Torah or not? Rosh Siman 13, Ritva 28a “Ella”
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 27B Ta Shema (04/16/2012)
Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 27B Ta Shema
Learn 1) Gemara 27b 3rd Ta Shma “Vhaya” until 1st wide line “Leima Ktanai” 2) Tosfos “Dorshuhu” 3) Major Question; If we are worried an object was lent and therefore do not accept Simanim there should never be a case that one could return an item since we should be concerned even if the claimant can give proper identification that the item was once his but was subsequently sold or gifted? Ritva 27a “Keilav” 4) Question; Why does the Gemara not bring a proof from the Mishna on 20a and 24b that we are not worried items were lent? See end of Tosfos 20b “Matza”, Rosh end of First Perek Siman 50
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 27B Chaishinan (4/18/2012)
Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 27B Chaishinan
1) Major Question; If we are worried an object was lent and therefore do not accept Simanim there should never be a case that one could return an item since we should be concerned even if the claimant can give proper identification that the item was once his but was subsequently sold or gifted? Ritva 27a “Keilav” 2) Question; Why does the Gemara not bring a proof from the Mishna on 20a and 24b that we are not worried items were lent? See end of Tosfos 20b “Matza”, Rosh end of First Perek Siman 50. 3) Learn Gemara 27b 3rd 1st wide line “Leima Ktanai” until “Amar Rava” 4) Fundemental Question (Chakira); What is the reason Simanim would not be accepted according to the Torah? Is it because we are concerned A. the person is lying, or B. there is another item with exactly the same Siman therefore the Siman is not conclusive proof to whom is the real owner? Bring a proof
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur (11/02/2011)
[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-11-02/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-11-02.wmv“] Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]
Gemara 24a “Ta Shma Hamotzi … until next Ta Shma” Also learn Tosfos “Ki” and first half of Tosfos “Im” (until Vchen Lkaman) Question in the conclusion of the Gemara we explain that Beis Medresh is considered majority gentiles because the watchman is a gentile. What is the explanation of this? See Ritva
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur (10/31/2011)
[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-31/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-10-31.wmv”] Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]
Gemara 24a “vchen haya r’ … Until Ta Shma” Major Questions; What is the reasoning of the Rabanan that the finder has to return the lost object by majority gentile? See end of Tosfos 23a “Vha” What is the reasoning of R’ Shimon ben Elazar that the finder can keep the lost object by majority Jews? See Tosfos “Afilu”. Also learn Tosfos “Ki
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur (10/26/2011)
[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-26/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-10-26.wmv“]Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]
Learn 1) Gemara 24a “Veilu Hein Keilim .. until Vchen Hoya ..” Question Rashi 20b “Shtarei Machriz” explains that in regards to Minyan being a Siman, the number 2 is not an acceptable siman so how could Rashi and Tosfos here say 2 is considered a siman? (Ritva for answer) 2) Tosfos 24a “Aval” 3) Gemara “Vchen Hoya … until Ibaiyu Lahu” Question: Is the reasoning “The owner had Yiush” also explaining Zuto Shel Yam [Machlokes; Rosh Siman 6, & Ritva “Mipnei”] 4) Start Gemara “Ibaiyu Lahu … “
Rabbi Shlomo Singer’s Tuesday Night Gemara Shiur (10/25/2011)
[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Shlomo_Singer/2011-10-25/Tues_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_Pages_25A_and_27A/Rabbi__Shlomo_Singer__Tues_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_Pages_25A_and_27A__2011-10-25.wmv”]Tuesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia Pages 25A and 27A[/popup]