Tagged: Gemara

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 27B Laima KiTanaee

 

1) Learn Gemara 27b 3rd 1st wide line “Leima Ktanai” until “Amar Rava”  2) Fundamental Question (Chakira); What is the reason Simanim would not be accepted according to the Torah? Is it because we are concerned A. the person is lying, or B. there is another item with exactly the same Siman therefore the Siman is not conclusive proof to whom is the real owner? Bring a proof. 3) Continue the Gemara from “Amar Rava” until bottom of the Amud. 4) Tosfos “Viana”

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur (12/19/2011)

Important question; According to Rav Chanina if one finds three coins of equal size stacked one on top of each other he may keep them because maybe they fell in this fashion.  How could this be? We rule by Safek Hinuach one is not permitted to keep the item, how do we know conclusively that someone did not intentionally stacked the coins this way?
Learn  1) Gemara 25a “Mai Machriz” (5 lines before bottom of page) until “Bai R’ Yirmiya” 2) In conclusion is identifying how the coins were placed an acceptable Siman? (Learn Chidushei Ran, Ritva) 3) If one identifies the place where the coins were found an acceptable Siman? (Learn Tosfos “Vhu”)  Question; Why is the number 2 not an acceptable Siman of Minyan?

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur (12/07/2011)

Learn 1) Gemara 25a from the Mishna until first “Ibaias aimar” 2) Tosfos “Ha”  Write out clearly the 3 different explanations (between Rashi and Tosfos)  of the Gem question 3) What is the answer of the Gemara “Kuba Kisna, Tzana Upeiri” according to the Rabbanel Channel?  4) Which explanation fits the best into the flow of the Gemara? (Shita Mekubetzes “Kasuv Bgilyon”)

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur (11/23/2011).

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-11-23/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24B/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24B__2011-11-23.wmv”]Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24B[/popup]

Learn 1) Gemara 24b “(2 dots) Rav Chanina… until Mishna  2) Why by the case of finding slaughtered chickens, where the ruling was that the finder was permitted to keep and eat, did the Gemara not use this as a proof that we rule like R’ Shiman ben Elazar even by majority Jews? What do we conclude in Halacha, do we Pasken like Raban Shimon ben Elazar by majority A) gentiles, B) Jews? See Nimukei Yosef, and Rosh end of siman 7.  3) What do we conclude according to Halacha regarding scenerio’s where there was Yiush yet the loser comes and gives a Siman. Is one obligated to return it based on Lifnim Mishuras Hadin?  (See Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat Siman 259,5

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur (11/21/2011).

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-11-21/Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24B/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24B__2011-11-21.wmv”]Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24B[/popup]

Learn 1) Gem’ 24b “(2 dots) Rav Chanina… until Mishna”  2) Tosfos “Lifnim Mshuras Hadin”  Get clear the levels Tosfos delineates.  Question; Is Lifnam Nshuras Hadin optional or required? [Rosh siman 7 (in middle), Rambam Hilchos Gezaila Vavaida 11,7] 3) What do we conclude in Halacha, do we Pasken like RabanShimon ben Elazar by majority gentiles, jews? Bring proof

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur (11/16/2011)

[popup url=”<a href="http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-11-16/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24B/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24B__2011-11-16.wmv“]Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24B[/popup]

Learn 1) Gem’ 24b “Rav Yehuda hava… until 2 dots” 2) Tosfos”Lbasar” Why does Tosfos disagree on Rashi’s explanation of “the 12 months”? Major Question; How could Tosfos disagree with the concept that after a certain period of time people are Myaaish, the Gemara 23b discussed person who found tar inside a winepress and concluded since there were weeds growing over it the owner for sure had Yiush? 3) Tosfos “Lifnim Mshuras Hadin”

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur (11/02/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-11-02/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-11-02.wmv“] Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]

Gemara 24a “Ta Shma Hamotzi … until next Ta Shma”    Also learn Tosfos “Ki” and first half of Tosfos “Im” (until Vchen Lkaman)  Question in the conclusion of the Gemara we explain that Beis Medresh is considered majority gentiles because the watchman is a gentile. What is the explanation of this? See Ritva

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur (10/31/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-31/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-10-31.wmv”] Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]

Gemara 24a “vchen haya r’ … Until Ta Shma” Major Questions; What is the reasoning of the Rabanan that the finder has to return the lost object by majority gentile?  See end of Tosfos 23a “Vha” What is the reasoning of R’ Shimon ben Elazar that the finder can keep the lost object by majority Jews?  See Tosfos “Afilu”.   Also learn Tosfos “Ki

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur (10/26/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-26/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-10-26.wmv“]Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]

Learn 1) Gemara 24a “Veilu Hein Keilim .. until Vchen Hoya ..”  Question Rashi 20b “Shtarei Machriz” explains that in regards to Minyan being a Siman, the number 2 is not an acceptable siman so how could Rashi and Tosfos here say 2 is considered a siman? (Ritva for answer)  2) Tosfos 24a “Aval”  3) Gemara “Vchen Hoya … until Ibaiyu Lahu”  Question:  Is the reasoning “The owner had Yiush” also explaining Zuto Shel Yam [Machlokes; Rosh Siman 6, & Ritva “Mipnei”] 4) Start Gemara “Ibaiyu Lahu … “