Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 14B to 15A: Amar Raba (2) (02/12/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2091″]
Quickly review :גמרא יד starting from “אמר רבה” (second to last line of the עמוד)
Until “טו. ” אמר עולא (nine lines from the top of the עמוד)
Question:
- If ר יוחנן retracted from his opinion regarding a לאו שקדמו עשה לוקין, and now holds אין לוקין, how does he answer the proof from the גמרא brought from our משנה that לאו שקדמו עשה לוקין? Learn “ריטבא “ותנינא
Point to ponder:
- Rashi explained the reasoning why ר יוחנן initially held לאו שקדמו עשה לוקין is since the עשה can be performed prior to the לאו it is clear that the function of the עשה is not as a punishment and rectification of the violation of the לאו . What is the logic of ר יוחנן now that he retracted from that opinion and holds that a לאו שקדמו עשה is אין לוקין?
Continue the גמרא until “במאי גמר מיניה ” (last line before the wide lines)
{For this גמרא one needs to look up the פסוקים about אונס and מוציא שם רע. }
