Online Shiurim

Category: Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s shiurim

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur (11/02/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-11-02/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-11-02.wmv“] Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]

Gemara 24a “Ta Shma Hamotzi … until next Ta Shma”    Also learn Tosfos “Ki” and first half of Tosfos “Im” (until Vchen Lkaman)  Question in the conclusion of the Gemara we explain that Beis Medresh is considered majority gentiles because the watchman is a gentile. What is the explanation of this? See Ritva

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur (10/31/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-31/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-10-31.wmv”] Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]

Gemara 24a “vchen haya r’ … Until Ta Shma” Major Questions; What is the reasoning of the Rabanan that the finder has to return the lost object by majority gentile?  See end of Tosfos 23a “Vha” What is the reasoning of R’ Shimon ben Elazar that the finder can keep the lost object by majority Jews?  See Tosfos “Afilu”.   Also learn Tosfos “Ki

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur (10/26/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-26/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-10-26.wmv“]Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]

Learn 1) Gemara 24a “Veilu Hein Keilim .. until Vchen Hoya ..”  Question Rashi 20b “Shtarei Machriz” explains that in regards to Minyan being a Siman, the number 2 is not an acceptable siman so how could Rashi and Tosfos here say 2 is considered a siman? (Ritva for answer)  2) Tosfos 24a “Aval”  3) Gemara “Vchen Hoya … until Ibaiyu Lahu”  Question:  Is the reasoning “The owner had Yiush” also explaining Zuto Shel Yam [Machlokes; Rosh Siman 6, & Ritva “Mipnei”] 4) Start Gemara “Ibaiyu Lahu … “

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur (10/24/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-24/Monday_Night_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Monday_Night_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_24A__2011-10-24.wmv”]Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 24A[/popup]

Major Question; How could it be permitted to lie in certain circumstances when the Torah clearly says “Midvar Sheker Tirchok”? Learn 1) Gemara 24a “Mar Zutra .. until VChen Hoya R’ Shimon ..” 2) Tosfos 24a “Umodeh”. Question on Tosfos; Why would the Rabanan have the opinion that even items which a person is not familiar with has to be announced? 3) Ritva “Umodeh” argues on Tosfos 4) Rashba “Umodeh” gives an answer to the question I asked on Tosfo

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur (10/10/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-10/Monday_Night_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_23B_to_24A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Monday_Night_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_23B_to_24A__2011-10-10.wmv”]Monday Night Shiur Bava Metzia 23B to 24A[/popup]

1) Review quickly Gemara 23B from 2 dots “R”S ben Elazar .. until 24a “Mar Zutra”. 2) Review quickly the 2 answers of Ritva to the question If a Tzurba Marabanan can claim any lost item even without a Siman so how can the Mishna 21A list 10 cases that the finder can keep the Aveida since it has no Siman? 3) Learn Rashi “Nafka Minah” very well. 4) Last three Tosfos on 23b “B’msechas, B’puria, B’ushpiza” Major Question; How could it be permitted to lie in certain circumstances when the Torah clearly says “Midvar Sheker Tirchok”? 5) Learn Gemara 24a “Mar Zutra .. until Valu hein Keilim ..” 6) Tosfos 24a “Umodeh”

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur 10/05/2011

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-05/Wednesday_Night_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_23B_and_Divrei_Torah_for_Yom_Kippur/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wednesday_Night_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_23B_and_Divrei_Torah_for_Yom_Kippur__2011-10-05.wmv”]Wednesday Night Shiur Bava Metzia 23B and Divrei Torah for Yom Kippur[/popup]

Learn Nimukei Yosef and Ritva on Gemara 23b “Hahu Gavra ..” (2 different answers). Also learn Hagaas Ashri (on the side of the Rosh Siman 5). Learn Gemara 23Bb from 2 dots “Rabi Shimon ben Elazar .. until Gemara 24a “Mar Zutra”. Major question; If a Tzurba Marabanan can claim any lost item even without a Siman so how can the Mishna 21a list 10 cases that the finder can keep the Aveida since it has no Siman??? (learn Ritva, 2 answers)

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur (10/03/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-10-03/Monday_Night_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_23B/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Monday_Night_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_23B__2011-10-03.wmv”]Monday Night Shiur Bava Metzia 23B[/popup]

Learn Gemara 23b from “Bai Minei Rav Bibi” until the next 2 dots. What’s the difference between the 2 versions of Rav Mari? (See Rashi “Ikka Diamri”, & Shita Mekubetzes “Vikasuv Rashi ..”
Gemara “Hahu Gavra ..” Major question: Why does the finder of the pitch keep it and not the owner of the wine press, don’t we say Chatzar Shel Adam Koneh Lo Shelo Midaato? Learn Nimukei Yosef and Ritva (2 different answers). Also learn Hagaas Ashri (on the side of the Rosh Siman 5)

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur (09/26/2011)

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-09-26/Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_23B/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_23B__2011-09-26.wmv”]Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia 23B[/popup]

Review quickly Tosfos 23b “Brashum”, & “Abaye”, (Extra. Learn Shita Mekubetzes who gives an answer for Rashi) What is the Siman of Rashum according to A) Rashi B) Tosfos? Learn Gemara 23b from “Bai Minei Rav Bibi” until the next 2 dots. Major question: Why does the finder of the pitch keep it and not the owner of the wine press, don’t we say Chatzar Shel Adam Koneh Lo Shelo Midaato? Learn Nimukei Yosef and Ritva (2 different answers).

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur September 14th, 2011

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-09-14/Wedneday_Night_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_Page_23A/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wedneday_Night_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_Page_23A__2011-09-14.wmv”]Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia Page 23A[/popup]

Learn Gemara 23a “Amar Rav Zvid” (4 lines from the bottom of the amud) until end of Amud. Questions 1) Does the din of Ein Mavirin Al Haochlin apply only to bread or also to other food items? and if so which ones? (bring a proof from the “Ikka D’amri of the Gemara’) 2) What do we conclude L’Halacha regarding these Simanim a) Makom b) Asui Ldareis c) Ba Mailov? 3) What constitutes Derech Hanacha a) When someone intentionally leaves something in designated place with intention to return and retrieve the item, or b) Intentionally places in this area but forgets the item there? {see Tosfos 21a “Eilu” starting from “Vyesh Lomar Dcrichos untill “Vkikoros ..””, Tosfos Rosh 21a “Krichos” last few lines “Umeihai Taama ..”, Maharasha 21b “Vha Lo Yoda “}
Learn Gemara 23b “Umachrusos Shel Dagim” until the 2 dots.

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur September 7th, 2011

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-09-07/Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_23A_An_Indentification_that_is_made_to_be_Trampled_on_Upon_etc./Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Wednesday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_23A_An_Indentification_that_is_made_to_be_Trampled_on_Upon_etc.__2011-09-07.wmv”]Wednesday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia Eilu Metzios 23A An Identification that is made to be Trampled on Upon etc.[/popup]

Learn Gemara 23a from “Leima Ktanai” until “Amar Rav Zvid” (4 lines from the bottom of the amud). 1st Tosfos ” Vha” very well (Note the Girsa Tosfos quotes of the Gemara See Chochmos Manoach, a Peirush in the back of the Gemara after the Maharsha) Also learn the Chidushei Ran on Vha Ikka Nachrim.
Learn Tosfos “Siman” Focus on the Machlokes Rashi and Tosfos.
Question of the night; Tosfos “Vha” (#2) asks that the question of the Gemara from animals is also a question on Rava. Why didn’t Tosfos “Vha” (#1) when asking on the question of the Gemara from gentiles also ask that this is also a question on Rava? (Bais Ahron, and Chachmas Manoach)

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Monday Night Gemara Shiur September 5th, 2011

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-09-05/Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_23_An_Indentification_that_is_made_to_be_Trampled_on_Upon/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Monday_Night_Gemara_Shiur_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_23_An_Indentification_that_is_made_to_be_Trampled_on_Upon__2011-09-05.wmv”]Monday Night Gemara Shiur Bava Metzia Eilu Metzios 23A An Identification that is made to be Trampled on Upon[/popup]

Learn Gemara 23a from “Ta Shma Kikoros ..” until “Leima Ktanai”. 1st Tosfos ” Vha” very well (Note the Girsa Tosfos quotes of the Gemara See Chochmos Manoach, a Peirush in the back of the Gemara after the Maharsha) Also learn the Chidushei Ran on Vha Ikka Nachrim. Gemara 23a Learn 2nd Tosfos ” Vha”. Learn Gemara 23a from “Leima Ktanai until ikka Damri”, Tosfos “Siman” Focus on the Machlokes Rashi and Tosfos.

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Gemara Shiur Wednesday Night, August 24th, 2011

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-08-24/Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_to_23A_Bundles_An_Indentification_made_to_be_Trampled_on_Upon_and_Is_a_Place_considered_an_Identifaction/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_to_23A_Bundles_An_Indentification_made_to_be_Trampled_on_Upon_and_Is_a_Place_considered_an_Identifaction__2011-08-24.wmv”]Tractate Bava Metzia Eilu Metzios 22B to 23A Bundles An Identification made to be Trampled on Upon and Is a Place considered an Identification[/popup]

Learn Gemara 22b starting from last “Ta Shma” until the “Ta Shma” on 23a. Learn Rashash on Gemara 23a for a question on Rashi’s opinion in Makkom Havai Siman. Then learn the first Tosfos at the beginning of the Perek 21a “Krichos” very well. Focus on getting clarity on how Rava and Rabbah explains the circumstances of the Mishna differently. (Charting it out might be very useful)

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Shiur Monday Night, August 22nd, 2011

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-08-22/Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Identifaction_in_regards_to_a_place_and_an_object/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Identifaction_in_regards_to_a_place_and_an_object__2011-08-22.wmv”]Tractate Bava Metzia Eilu Metzios 22B Identification in regards to a place and an object[/popup]

Learn Gemara 22b starting from “ViIka Dmasni ..until “Ta Shma”. Gemara brings a Machlokes if Makom is a Siman. Learn Rashi well and see Tosfos “Iy” Focus on 1) What is the argument between Tosfos and Rashi in what the Siman of Makom is. 2) List a proof to Tosfos explanation. List a proof to Rashi’s explanation. Question of the night on Rashi explanation: If Makom is not a Siman even according to Rava how could the Gemara say that Rava is LShitaso that Makom is a Siman? (See Ritva “udika ..” for the question and Shita Mekubetzes “”Machriz ..” (until the words Umikol Makom ..) for an answer. Start next Gemara “Ta Shma .. “

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Shiur Wednesday Night August 17th, 2011

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-08-17/Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Identification_that_was_made_to_be_trampled_upon/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Identification_that_was_made_to_be_trampled_upon__2011-08-17.wmv”]Tractate Bava Metzia Eilu Metzios 22B Identification that was made to be trampled upon[/popup]

Learn Gemara 22b starting from the 2 dots “Krichos B”rhr” untill “Ta Shma” What is the explanation behind the argument if Siman Asui Ldarais Havei Siman? See Rashi, Shita Mekubetzes “Siman Hasui Ldarais . ” (brings Rashi’s explanation) for a different explanation then Rashi and Nafka Minah between them. Gemara brings a Machlokes if Makom is a Siman. Learn Rashi well and see Tosfos “Iy” Focus on what is the argument between Tosfos and Rashi in what the Siman of Makom is.

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Shiur Monday Night, August 15th, 2011

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-08-15/Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Conclusion_of_Yeush_Shelo_Midaas_Giving_Up_Without_Knowledge_Begiining_of_Krichos_in_the_Public_Domain/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Conclusion_of_Yeush_Shelo_Midaas_Giving_Up_Without_Knowledge_Begiining_of_Krichos_in_the_Public_Domain__2011-08-15.wmv”]Tractate Bava Metzia Eilu Metzios 22B Conclusion of Yeush Shelo Midaas Giving Up Without Knowledge Beginning of Krichos in the Public Domain[/popup]

Learn Gemara 22b “Hilchasa Kavasai Kabayei .. until the 2 dots. Learn Tosfos “DLav”, Shita Mekubatzes on Gem answer “Shkutzim ..” Start Gemara “Krichos B”rhr” What is the explanation behind the argument if Siman Asui Ldarais Havei Siman? See Rashi, Shita Mekubetzes

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Shiur Wednesday Night, August 10th, 2011

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-08-10/Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Conclusion_of_Yeush_Shelo_Midaas_Giving_Up_Without_Knowledge_Shiur_2/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Conclusion_of_Yeush_Shelo_Midaas_Giving_Up_Without_Knowledge_Shiur_2__2011-08-10.wmv”]Tractate Bava Metzia Eilu Metzios 22B Conclusion of Yeush Shelo Midaas Giving Up Without Knowledge Shiur 2[/popup]

What is a practical Halachic difference between the 2 reasons we explained for the law that one may keep a lost item by Zuta Shel Yam even if it has a siman? How does Rava answer the proof against him from Zuta Shel Yam (See Tosfos Tiyuvta)
Learn Gem 22b “Hilchasa Kavasai KAbayei .. until the 2 dots. Why is the Gemara predicating the question on the fact that we just refuted Rav? (Learn Rashi “Heichi .., Tosfos “Meiacher”) Why do they argue? Question of the week; If the reason one may keep a lost item by Zuta Shel Yam even if it has a siman is because of Yiush (Opinion of Rashi) How do we know that the owner is aware that is was swept away, and if he is not aware how can the finder keep it according to Abayei who holds Yiush Shelo Midaas Lo Havai Yiush?

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Bodenheim’s Shiur Wednesday Night August 3rd, 2011

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-08-03/Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Conclusion_of_Yeush_Shelo_Midaas_Giving_Up_Without_Knowledge/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Conclusion_of_Yeush_Shelo_Midaas_Giving_Up_Without_Knowledge__2011-08-03.wmv”]Tractate Bava Metzia Eilu Metzios 22B Conclusion of Yeush Shelo Midaas Giving Up Without Knowledge[/popup]

Learn Gem 22b “Ta Shma D’Amar R” Yochanon..” thru “Hilchasa Kavasai KAbayei .. ”  Focus on 1) How we learn out from Zuta Shel Yam that Yiush Shlo Mdaas is Not Yiush (Machlokes Rashi and Tosfos “Isura”)  Question of the night;  R Yishmael says we learn an item lost by Zuta Shel Yam can be kept by the finder.  How can this be learnt from the Posuk quoted, the Posuk is dealing with the laws of “Hashavas Aveida”  So all we see is Zuta Shel Yam is excluded from the Mitzva of Hashevas Aveida but how do we know the ownership of the original owner has been removed?   (See Rashi Bava Kama 66a “Motzah Aveida”. Rashba Bava Metzia 21a “Zuta ..”)

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Bodenheim’s Shiur Monday Night, August 1st, 2011

CLICK HERE for Audio

Learn last “Ta Shma” of Gem 22a until next “Ta Shma” on 22b. Focus on the conclusion of the Gemara 1) Are we still remaining with the law that the owner himself needs to place the water on the fruits? 2) How do we reconcile the question on Rava? Start next “Ta Shma D’Amar R” Yochanon..” on 22b untill “Isura Dumia Dhetera” See Rashi Bava Kama 66a “Motzah Aveida”
Question of the week; How is the concept of “The revelation of ones conscent now revealing that initially he conscented” related to the dispute of Yiush shlo mdaas?
Yasher Koach to Allen Kahn and Yaakov Meir Goldstein for sending in an answer to last weeks question that I asked at the end of shiur.

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim's shiurim

 by 

Rabbi Bodenheim’s Shiur Wednesday Night, July 27th, 2011

CLICK HERE for Audio

Learn last “Ta Shma” of Gem 22a until next “Ta Shma” on 22b. Focus on 1) Why is this Braissa a question on Rava. Learn first Maharam Shif 22b, last Shita Mekubetzes on 22a. 2) In conclusion of the Gemara how do we reconcile the question on Rava. Question of the week; How is the concept of “The revelation of ones conscent now revealing that initially he conscented” related to the dispute of Yiush shlo mdaas? (BTW I am still waiting for an answer for last weeks and this past Mon night’s question)