Very quickly review the גמרא דף ט.”א’ל רב הונא בריה דרבי יהושע (twelve lines from bottom of the Amud) until דף ט: “ולרבי שמעון בן גמליאל (sixth line from top of the Amud)
Is the reason for אביי connected to his opinion that Lechi is a mechitza?
Learn the ריף
Note: the requirements that the Rif specifies to allow one to carry between the Lechi.
Learn the בעל המאור who disagrees with the Rif
Learn the מלחמת ה who defends the conclusion of the Rif
Very quickly review the גמרא דף ט.”תני ר’ זכאי (fourteen lines from top of the Amud) until “א’ל רב הונא בריה דרבי יהושע (twelve lines from bottom of the Amud)
Continue learning the Gemara until דף ט: “ולרבי שמעון בן גמליאל (sixth line from top of the Amud)
Last week wwe discussed the following question.
Rava says the area בין לחיים is compared to מקום שאין בו ד על ד and it’s permitted for both the people in Reshus Hayachid and Reshus Harabim to use.
How could the people in Reshus Harabim use this area that is between three walls, it’s a Reshus Hayachid?
The רשב”א “מקום answers we only consider the area between the Lechi annexed to the Mavui
The Ritva & Rashba clearly established the case of our gemara is where the diagonal line from the wall of the Mavui to the Korah is three tefachim or more.
Is there a possible explanation as to why both concepts of חבוט and לבוד are needed to connect the Korah to the walls of the Mavui even when the diagonal is less than three?
Learn ח’ ר’ חיים ה’ סוכה פרק ה הלכה כא (attached in this email – starting from paragraph on bottom of right column)
Note how Reb Chaim explains
1) Why Chavut and Lavud is needed even though the diagnol line between the Korah and the walls of the Mavui is less then three?
2) A new answer to question of Tosfos as to why the Korah can not be higher then three tefachim as Chavut is not limited to within three tefachim.
3) Whether the shapes of the pegs holding up the Korah make a difference
Learn the גמרא דף ט.”תני ר’ זכאי (fourteen lines from top of the Amud) until “א’ל רב הונא בריה דרבי יהושע (twelve lines from bottom of the Amud)
Review the גמרא דף ט. “רב אשי אמר (none lines from top of the Amud) until “תני ר’ זכאי (fourteen lines from top of the Amud)
Learn תוס’ דף ט. “שאין who asks why is it necessary for the Korah to be within the height of 3 tefachim of the wall in order to say חבוט when it is clear from the gemara Sukkah that the concept of חבוט is not limited like לבוד to 3 tefachim.
Questions:
Why do we need both concepts of חבוט and לבוד to connect the Korah to the walls of the Mavui. Why can’t we consider the Korah connected through לבוד alone?
What is the shape of the pegs that are holding up the Korah?
See ח’ ר’ חיים ה’ סוכה פרק ה הלכה כא who explains the opinion of the Rambam and how it differs from Tosfos and how the Rambam explains the configuration of the pegs holding up the Korah.
Quickly review the גמרא דף ח: בעי מיניה רמי בר חמא (four lines from bottom of the Amud) until “איתיביה” (bottom of the Amud)
Continue learning the גמרא דף ח: “איתיביה until דף ט. “רב אשי אמר (nine lines from top of the Amud)
Question:
Is רב אדא בר מתנה asking only on Rava who rules the Korah needs to be resting on top of the walls of the Mavui or also on Rav Chisda who rules according to opinion of קורה משום מחיצה the inner face plate of the Korah needs to be flush to the walls of the Mavui?
See תוס’ ישנים (on side of the Gemara)
See ח’ ר”ן
Continue learning the גמרא דף ט. “רב אשי אמר until “תני ר’ זכאי (fourteen lines from top of the Amud)
Learn תוס’ דף ט. “שאין who asks why is it necessary for the Korah to be within the height of 3 tefachim of the wall in order to say חבוט when it is clear from the gemara Sukkah that the concept of חבוט is not limited like לבוד to 3 tefachim.
Questions:
Why do we need both concepts of חבוט and לבוד to connect the Korah to the walls of the Mavui. Why can’t we consider the Korah connected through לבוד alone?
What is the shape of the pegs that are holding up the Korah?
Learn ריטב”א “כגון שאין בגובהן ג’ טפחים
Note how the Ritva answers the above questions. See the answer the Ritva gives to Tosfos question.
Learn the גמרא דף ח: בעי מיניה רמי בר חמא ((four lines from bottom of the Amud) until “איתיביה” (bottom of the Amud)
Question:
Is Rav Chisda saying his ruling according to the reasoning of קורה משום מחיצה or קורה משום היכר?
Bring a proof from Rashi
Learn ריטב”א
Rashi “דף ח: “לדברי המתיר says the closure created by the outer face plate of the Korah is not connected to the Mavui.
Question:
Why can’t we consider it connected to the Mavui through the concept of Lavud?
Learn רשב”א
Learn the גמרא דף ח: “איתיביה until דף ט. “רב אשי אמר (nine lines from top of the Amud)
Question:
Is רב אדא בר מתנה asking only on Rava who rules the Korah needs to be resting on top of the walls of the Mavui or also on Rav Chisda who rules according to opinion of קורה משום מחיצה the inner face plate of the Korah needs to be flush to the walls of the Mavui?
See תוס’ ישנים (on side of the Gemara)
See ח’ ר”ן
Continue learning the גמרא דף ט. “רב אשי אמר until “תני ר’ זכאי (fourteen lines from top of the Amud)
Learn תוס’ דף ט. “שאין
Questions:
Why do we need both concepts of חבוט and לבוד to connect the Korah to the walls of the Mavui. Why can’t we consider the Korah connected through לבוד alone?
What is the shape of the pegs that are holding up the Korah?
What is the difference between Tosfos and the Ritva answers?
Rava holds the Korah must be placed straight and not on an angle because a Korah is just considered a היכר and placing a Korah on an angle is not a היכר.
Major Question:
Tosfos תוס’ “מניח asked according to Rav Kahana how could it be permitted to carry along the border of the Korah even opposite the long wall as there are only two walls blocking in this part of the Mavui and need minimum of three walls to make it a reshus hayachid. Tosfos first answer is according to Rav Kahana Korah is Mechitza and therefore there really are three walls.
Rava explains his position that one must place the Korah on straight from the edge of the short wall and parallel to the opposite wall to the edge of the long wall because קורה משום היכר and if place the Korah on an angle its not a היכר
Why doesn’t Rava just simply say the reason is קורה משום היכר and therefore if place the Korah on an angle from the short side to the long side you will only have two walls?
According to Rava if one places the Korah on an angle from the edge of the short wall to the edge of the long wall would it be permitted to carry in the back part of the Mavui from the inside of the short wall?
See ביאור הלכה ס’ שס”ג סע’ ל “אינו מניח who brings a dispute between the Machatzits Hashekel and Pri Megadim regarding this.
See מחצית השקל ס’ שס”ג ס”ק ל for his Chidush and the פרי מגדים משבצות זהב ס”ק כא who argues and based on his position answers the major question we asked above.
Major Question:
How could the Machatzitz Hashekel permit carrying in the back part of the Mavui Tosfos clearly says if one can not carry opposite the long wall than its considered outside the mavui and the korah is considered placed outside the mavui therefore the Korah should not be able to allow one to carry inside any part of the mavui?
Learn the גמרא דף ח: “איבעיא להו מהו להשתמש תחת הקורה until “איתיביה (bottom of the Amud)
Question:
Why is it definitely prohibited to carry in the area opposite the Lechi?
Learn תוס’ “הכל (first half of Tosfos until “דהא אביי )
The Rishonim give other explanations.
Learn רשב”א דף ח: “אמר רב חסדא
Learn תוס’ ריד דף ט for a chidush in how Lechi operates as a Mechitza
Learn קרן אורה דף ט. “תני ר’ זכאי who adds an understanding in the operation of Lechi as a Mechitza
What is the difference between Tosfos and the Ritva answers?
Rava argues and holds the Korah must be placed straight and not on an angle. The gemara says the reason is because a Korah on an angle is not a היכר.
Why doesn’t the gemara simply say the reason is קורה משום היכר and therefore if place the Korah on an angle from the short side to the long side you will only have two walls?
What is the difference between Tosfos and the Ritva answers?
Rava argues and holds the Korah must be placed straight and not on an angle. The gemara says the reason is because a Korah on an angle is not a היכר.
Why doesn’t the gemara simply say the reason is קורה משום היכר and therefore if place the Korah on an angle from the short side to the long side you will only have two walls?
Very quickly review the גמרא דף ח. “גופא אמר רב ירמיה בר אבא (two dots) until דף ח: “איתמר (five lines from top of the Amud)
Rashi דף ח: “ולרבה has the words “ואפילו בחצר” in parentheses.
Point to Consider:
Does a חצר מפולש have the same halacha as a מבוי מפולש?
See the מהרש”ל & מהרש”א & מהרש”א מהדורא בתרא (underneath the מהרש”א) who discuss why the חצר should also be prohibited.
Last week we learnt the גמרא דף ח. “מרימר פסיק לה לסורא באוזלי. Rashi learnt מרימר placed the nets on the end of the street before the sea. However the מגיד משנה explained according to the Rambam who rules we are not concerned for שמא יעלה הים שרטון the case was that מרימר placed the nets on the other open side of the street.
Question on the מגיד משנה:
Rabbi Jaffe asked me the following question on Shabbos.
What was the need to place nets – a full wall on the fourth side as since the sea wall is a valid wall than this road is a classic dead end mavui which only requires a Lechi or Korah on the fourth side?
For a novel explanation see בית מאיר ס’ שס”ג סע’ כט
Learn the גמרא דף ח: “איתמר מבוי העשוי כנדל until “אמר רב כהנא בר תחליפא”
Learn the גמרא דף ח. “ההוא מבוי עקום (middle of the Amud) until the next set of two dots.
Continue learning the Gemara until דף ח: “איתמר (five lines from top of the Amud)
Last week we learnt the גמרא דף ח. “מרימר פסיק לה לסורא באוזלי. Rashi learnt מרימר placed the nets on the end of the street before the sea. However the מגיד משנה explained according to the Rambam who rules we are not concerned for שמא יעלה הים שרטון the case was that מרימר placed the nets on the other open side of the street.
Question on the מגיד משנה:
Rabbi Jaffe asked me the following question on Shabbos.
What was the need to place nets – a full wall on the fourth side as since the sea wall is a valid wall than this road is a classic dead end mavui which only requires a Lechi or Korah on the fourth side?
For a novel explanation see בית מאיר ס’ שס”ג סע’ כט
