Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 18A: Ella Krah Yisaira (06/02/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2568″]
Category: Makkos
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 17B to 18A: Gemara Ela Mai… (05/26/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2535″]
Learn גמרא יז: “אלא מאי (eight lines from bottom of the עמוד ) until דף יח. ” גופא
Questions:
The גמרא explains the word לוקין to meet איסור so why does the גמרא feel when רבא says לוקין it has to meet לוקין literally? Learn ריטב”א
List the five violations deserving of מלקות that a זר will receive if he eats from a קרבן עולה before זריקה outside ירושלים ?
Major question:
Once we say that we can not learn the מלקות from a ק”ו why do we apply the לימודים for a new איסור based on a ק”ו we need the פסוק to teach us that each one of these cases receives מלקות. For eating חוץ לחומה ?
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 17B: Gemara Amar Rava… (05/21/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2505″]
Learn גמרא יז: “אמר רבא (second line from top of the עמוד)
Until “וכי מזהירין ” (six lines before the bottom of the עמוד )
Questions:
- The רבנן ask on ר”ש that חטאת & אשם should be considered more חמור then עולה since they are מכפרין as opposed to an עולה. But this is not true! An עולה is also מכפר?
- What are the two אכילות?
- The רבנן say that everything is more חמור then עולה because everything else is eaten. This contradicts what the רבנן just said a line prior! They said עולה is more חמור then חטאת & אשם because it’s not eaten rather it’s entirely consumed? (Learn ריטב”א )
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 17A to 17B: Drashos of Rabi Shimon (05/19/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2502″]
Quickly review .גמרא דף יז starting from after the משנה.
Must look up the פסוק that ר”ש is basing his דרשות on – דברים פרק י”ב פסוק יז
Continue learning the גמרא until יז: “ואע”ג (third line from the top of the עמוד )
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 17A: Mishna HaOchel Bikurim (05/14/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2479″]
Learn .משנה יז and the גמרא until the bottom of the Amud
(We will be covering ground tonight)
On Sugya before the משנה
Learn “רש” י חולין קב: “טמאה
Questions:
- How does רש” י define בריה different then “תוס’ “ורבנן ?
- What is the Machlokes between רש” י and תוס’ dependent on?
- According to ר”ש why is a חיוב מלקות on eating a כל שהוא, yet for a חיוב קרבן one needs to eat a כזית? Learn ריטב” א
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 17A: ViHacha BiHa Kamifligi… (05/12/2-014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2466″]
Quickly review “גמרא יז. “והכא בהא קא מיפלגי until the two dots.
Question:
- What was the big effort to designate מעשר עני, all that one needs to do is to designate a certain segment of the produce without separating it from the rest? learn ה’ הגר”א
Learn .גמרא יז from the two dots until the משנה.
Questions:
- In conclusion what is considered a בריה ?
- Why does the רבנן agree that one is חייב מלקות for eating a בריה even when it is less then a כזית ?
Learn “תוס’ “ורבנן who gives new guidelines for what is considers a בריה according to the רבנן
- How does ‘תוס new guidelines fit with the words of ורבנן בריית נשמה חשובה ?
Learn רש” י חולין קב: “טמאה
- What is the reason that a בריה is not בטל in a mixture?
- According to ר”ש why is a חיוב מלקות on eating a כל שהוא yet for a חיוב קרבן one needs to eat a כזית? Learn ריטב” א
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 16B to 17A: Sugya of Teruma Shiur 2 (05/07/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2447″]
Review the ” גמרא טז: “אמר רב יוסף כתנאי until the two dots on .יז
Questions:
- The גמרא explains that if there is no איסור טבל for מעשר עני then there is no obligation to separate מספק, Why not? even if there is no Malkus there is definitely a Mitzvah to separate the מעשר עני?
- Why was an עם הארץ careful on איסור טבל and not for איסור גזל ?
- If they were concerned for חיוב מיתה Why did they not separate תרומת מעשר?
- What was the big effort to designate מעשר עני, all that one needs to do is to designate a certain segment of the produce without separating it from the rest? learn ה’ הגר”א and look up גמרא נדרים פד ?
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 16B: Sugya of Teruma Shiur 1 (05/05/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2431″]
Quickly review “… גמרא טז: “רבא א”ר יוחנן until the two dots.
Question:
- Why is two crushed bugs more of a חידוש then ten crushed bugs? Learn “תוס’ “ואפילו
Continue learning the גמרא until “יז. ” אמר ליה אביי (third line)
Questions: (All the answers to these questions are in רש”י)
- What is the חידוש that eating טבל של מעשר עני is חייב מלקות ?
- What is דמאי? and what is one obligated to do with it in order to eat it?
- Why is one permitted to eat the מעשר ראשון he separated from דמאי without giving it to the לוי ?
- Why in regards to מעשר עני from דמאי is it sufficient to specify what part of the food is מעשר עני without requiring to physically separate it like is necessary by מעשר ראשון & מעשר שני?
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 16B: Amar Raba Bar Rav Huna… (04/30/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2413″]
Learn “גמרא טז: “אמר רבא בר רב הונא
until the two dots
until the two dots
Learn “תוס’ “ריסק
Clarify the difference between how ‘רש”י & תוס learn the גמרא
Clarify the difference between how ‘רש”י & תוס learn the גמרא
Questions;
- How does ‘תוס answer his questions on רש”י?
- How does רש”י answer ‘תוס question? (Learn ערוך לנר who defends רש”י explanation)
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 16B: Amar Abaye… (04/28/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2393″]
Learn “.. גמרא טז: “אמר אביי (middle of the עמוד) until אמר רבא בר רב הונא
Look up the פסוקים of the various לאוין for insects.
A. שרץ סתם – ויקרא י” א,מ”ג
B. שרץ המים – ויקרא י”א,י-י”א & דברים י”ד,י
C. שרץ הארץ – ויקרא י”א,מ”א & מ”ב & מ”ד
D. שרץ העוף – דברים י”ד,י”ט
Question;
- Why does the לאוין of שרץ הארץ apply to שרץ העוף if they don’t live on the ground? ( ערוך לנר & “ע’ מאירי “אכל צרעה )
- Which non- kosher fish are included in the לאו of שרצים? (See מאירי )
- The גמרא gives two examples of cases that are included in the לאו of אל תשקצו, are these two cases forbidden מדאורייתא or מדרבנן? (See ריטב” א)
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 16B: Amar Rav Yehuda… (04/23/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2381″]
Learn גמרא טז: “והאוכל שקצים (two dots a third of the way down from the top of the עמוד) until אמר רב אחאי
Learn “תוס’ “ביניתא
How does רש”י answer תוס’ question? ( ע’ ריטב”א and ערוך לנר )
Why does the לאוין of שרץ הארץ apply to שרץ העוף if they don’t live on the ground? (“ע’ מאירי “אכל צרעה )
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 16B: Ela Zos.. (04/09/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2360″]
Finish learning the :גמרא טז until the first set of two dots.
{I will speak about Pesach during the last part of Shiur}
Question:
- Who made the נדר that the Rebbe would not be able to teach the children anymore ? (רמב”ם שבועות ו,ט)
Point to ponder:
- Why is the fact that no one was as exacting as this Rebbe be a reason to reinstate him after hitting the children excessively especially according to “רש” י בכורות מו. “פשע who says the children died?
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 16A to 16B: Sugya of Bitlo ViLo Bitlo Kimo ViLo Kimo (04/03/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2328″]
Review the .גמרא טז from ותו ליכא ” (five lines from bottom the עמוד) until the top of “טז: ” והא איכא
Point to ponder:
- Bring a proof from the גמרא that there is no מצוה of והשיב את הגזילה when the object is no longer in existence. (חידושי ר’ חיים ה’ גזילה ואבידה ט,ל”א third paragraph)
Learn the :גמרא טז until the first set of two dots.
Question:
- Who made the נדר that the Rebbe would not be able to teach the children anymore ? (רמב”ם שבועות ו,ט)
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 16A: Amar Rav Simi MiChuzna’a… (03/31/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2315″]
Review the .גמרא טז from “אלא אמר רב שימי מנהרדעאה ” (middle of the wide lines) until the top of “טז: ” והא איכא
Points to ponder:
- How can husband be a שליח for the wife to receive her קידושין to another man but we have a rule אין שליח לדבר עבירה ?
- Learn “תוס’ “כגון. How does רש”י answer the question of תוס?
- Bring a proof from the גמרא that there is no מצוה of והשיב את הגזילה when the object is no longer in existence.
Learn the :גמרא טז: until the first set of two dots.
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 16A: Sugya of Kum Lai BiDiraba Mineai (03/26/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2291″]
Learn the .גמרא טז from “אלא אמר רב שימי מנהרדעא ” (middle of the wide lines) until the top of “טז: ” והא איכא
Question on previous גמרא :
- In order to apply the דין of קם ליה בדרבה מיניה both violations have to be violated at the same time :רש”י טו says the violation of the לאו is immediately and the nullification of the עשה is akin to nullification of a תנאי. So how is the culpability of death penalty from murder coming at the same time as the culpability for מלקות which comes at the time of violation of the לאו ? Learn ערוך לנר “בדרבה מיניה for an answer
Major Question:
- How do we reconcile this to .רש”י טו who says according to the opinion of of ביטלו ולא ביטלו the לאו is only completed upon the nullification of the עשה ?
Points to ponder:
- The גליון הש”ס presents two more scenarios where the husband would not חייב מיתה for killing his ex-wife. Why can’t these cases be a viable option of culpability for lashes according to the opinion of bitlo vlo bitlo.
- How can husband be a שליח for the wife to receive her קידושין to another man but we have a rule אין שליח לדבר עבירה ?
Learn “תוס’ “כגון
Bring a proof from the גמרא that there is no מצוה of והשיב את הגזילה when the object is no longer in existence.
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 16A: Tnan Husum… (03/24/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2278″]
Review the .גמרא טז from “תנן” (last of the narrow lines) until “אמר רב שימי מחוזנאה” (middle of the wide lines)
Major Question:
- In order to apply the דין of קם ליה בדרבה מיניה both violations have to be violated at the same time. We explained according to רש”י טו: understanding of ביטלו ולא ביטלו the לאו is completed upon violation of the לאו so how is it possible to say קם ליה בדרבה מיניה ? Learn ריטבא “אי who asks this question & ערוך לנר “בדרבה מיניה for an answer
Learn “תוס’ “אי who presents a scenario where the husband would not חייב מיתה for killing his ex-wife.
Learn גליון הש”ס who presents two more scenarios where the husband would not חייב מיתה for killing his ex-wife.
Continue the גמרא until “ותו ליכא” (five lines from the bottom)
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 16A: ViTarvaihu… (03/17/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2252″]
Learn .גמרא טז from “ותרוייהו” (four lines from top of the עמוד) until “תנן” (last of the narrow lines)
Question:
- How does the fact that ר’ יוחנן holds like the תנא that לאו שאין בו מעשה אין לוקין help to explain why he does not learn out from the פסוק of נותר to say לוקין? Learn מהר”ם
Point to ponder:
- Why is a התראת ספק not a good התראה? Learn ערוך לנר “אלמא
Questions that we still have not resolved on the previous גמרא :
- Rashi when answering a question on ר’ יוחנן compares the ביטל עשה to a תנאי and the לאו to being עובר האיסור. This is a major contradiction to what רש”י said earlier that the לאו is not concluded until the ביטול העשה ?
- The ברכת אברהם explained שיטת תוס regarding a לאו הניתק לעשה in the opinion of ר”ל of קיימו ולא קיימו that the עבירה is not concluded with the violation of the לאו, rather it is only concluded upon the declining of Beis Din’s ultimatum. If this is true then what is the proof that ר”ל who holds a התראת ספק is not considered a valid התראה holds קיימו ולא קיימו. All cases of לאו הניתק לעשה will be התראת ספק since the עבירה is not concluded with the violation of the לאו? Learn “תוס’ “במאי (use the גירסא of the ב”ח אות א’ & מסורת הש”ס אות ה)
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 15B: Anaylsis of Machlokes Reb Yochanan and Reish Lakish (03/12/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2229″]
Major Questions:
- Rashi when answering a question on ר’ יוחנן compares the ביטל עשה to a תנאי and the לאו to being עובר האיסור. This is a major contradiction to what רש”י said earlier that the לאו is not concluded until the ביטול העשה ?
- The ברכת אברהם explained שיטת תוס regarding a לאו הניתק לעשה in the opinion of ר”ל of קיימו ולא קיימו that the עבירה is not concluded with the violation of the לאו, rather it is only concluded upon the declining of Beis Din’s ultimatum. If this is true then what is the proof that ר”ל who holds a התראת ספק is not considered a valid התראה holds קיימו ולא קיימו. All cases of לאו הניתק לעשה will be התראת ספק since the עבירה is not concluded with the violation of the לאו?
Learn “תוס’ “במאי (use the גירסא of the ב”ח אות א’ & מסורת הש”ס אות ה)
Point to ponder:
In the case of שבועה שאוכל ככר זו היום and he does not eat the bread when did he violate the שבועה?
A) every second he did not eat. or
B) at the end of the the day.
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 15B: Ibaee LiHu.. (03/10/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2223″]
Learn .גמרא טו from “במאי קא מיפלגי” until “דף טז. “ותרוייהו
Learn “רש”י “רבי יוחנן” & “וריש לקיש very well.
Focus on how רש”י explains why the מחלוקת of קיימו ולא קיימו & ביטלו ולא ביטלו is dependent on whether התראת ספק is considered a valid התראה
Major Questions:
- Rashi when answering a question on ר’ יוחנן compares the ביטל עשה to a תנאי and the לאו to being עובר האיסור. This is a major contradiction to what רש”י said earlier that the לאו is not concluded until the ביטול העשה ?
- The ברכת אברהם explained שיטת תוס regarding a לאו הניתק לעשה in the opinion of ר”ל of קיימו ולא קיימו that the עבירה is not concluded with the violation of the לאו, rather it is only concluded upon the declining of Beis Din’s ultimatum. If this is true then what is the proof that ר”ל who holds a התראת ספק is not considered a valid התראה holds קיימו ולא קיימו. All cases of לאו הניתק לעשה will be התראת ספק since the עבירה is not concluded with the violation of the לאו?
Learn “תוס’ “במאי (use the גירסא of the ב”ח אות א’ & מסורת הש”ס אות ה)
Point to ponder:
In the case of שבועה שאוכל ככר זו היום and he does not eat the bread when did he violate the שבועה?
A) every second he did not eat. or
B) at the end of the the day.
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 15B: Midi Hu Taima.. (03/05/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2201″]
Review גמרא טו : מידי starting from the top of the עמוד
Learn “תוס’ “מידי starting from ולכך פ’ ר’ שלמה מדרוי”ש for an entirely new way to explain the question of the .גמרא טו of “הניחא
Question:
- How would רש”י answer ‘תוס question?
- Why did רש”י not explain the גמרא question of הניחא like ר’ שלמה מדרוי”ש?
Continue learning the גמרא from במאי קא מיפלגי until “דף טז. “ותרוייהו
Learn “רש”י “רבי יוחנן ” & “וריש לקיש very well.
Focus on the way רש”י explains how the מחלוקת of קיימו ולא קיימו & ביטלו ולא ביטלו is dependent on whether התראת ספק is considered a valid התראה
Major Question:
- According to our explanation from the ברכת אברהם in שיטת תוס , what is the proof that ר”ל holds קיימו ולא קיימו since תוס hold the לאו is not concluded with the violation?
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 15A: Hanicha LiMan… (03/03/2014)
[jwplayer mediaid=”2189″]
Review גמרא טו starting from “הניחא” (Second to last line of the עמוד) until “טו: “דתני תנא and continue the גמרא until ” במאי קא מיפליגי”
Learn “רש”י “הניחא carefully to understand the למדות of ביטלו ולא ביטלו & קיימו ולא קיימו
Learn “תוס’ “הניחא who gives a different time frame then רש”י to fulfill the עשה .
Questions:
- According to the opinion of קיימו ולא קיימו why does ב”ד give the violator an opportunity to fulfill the עשה .
- How does ‘תוס differ from רש”י’s understanding of קיימו ולא קיימו?
Learn “תוס’ “מידי starting from ולכך פ’ ר’ שלמה מדרוי”ש for an entirely new way to explain the question of the .גמרא טו of “הניחא
- How would רש”י answer ‘תוס question?
- Why did רש”י not explain the גמרא question of הניחא like ר’ שלמה מדרוי”ש?
Point to ponder (On the prior גמרא):
- The גמרא explains the reason why there is no מלקות by a לאו הניתק לעשה is because the עשה rectifies the לאו. This is direct contradiction to the :גמרא י”ג which says the reason is because a לאו הניתק לעשה is not similar to the לאו דחסימה ? We could answer that the : גמרא י”ג initially thought the reason was because it is not similar to the לאו דחסימה but the גמרא by us clarifies and concludes the reason why there is no מלקות by a לאו הניתק לעשה is because the עשה rectifies the לאו. The issue is “רש”י פסחים פד. “בא brings both reasons to explain why there is no מלקות by a לאו הניתק לעשה???