Category: Makkos

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 23A: Amar Rav Sheishes… (12/10/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”4162″]

Download Here

Review .גמרא כג from “ואמר רב ששת ” (second wide line) until the two dots of “והקורא קורא ” (middle of the עמוד)

Questions:
  • Why does someone who speaks or listens to לה”ר , or testifies falsely deserving to be thrown to the dogs?  ( מאירי, & מהרש”א )

Continue learning the גמרא until the משנה

Makkos23A

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: End of Mishna “Keitzad Malkin”: ViIm Meis… and Gemara: Mai Taima… (12/08/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”4041″]

Download Here

Very quickly review last : משנה כב

Questions:
  • Why is the מלקה exempt when the נלקה dies due to the lashes? (See רש”י ח.  “ושליח ב”ד)
  • When the מלקה adds an extra lash resulting in the death of the נלקה the  מלקה go to גלות. Why? גלות is only for an accident, and this is negligence? (See ריבן , ריטב”א )  (Extra See רמב”ם רוצח ה,ו & ה’ ראב”ד

Continue learning .גמרא כג until the two dots of “והקורא קורא ” (middle of the עמוד)

Questions:
  • What is the case of מבזה המועדים ? (See רש”י, רמב”ם ה’ יו”ט ו, טז-יז )
  • Why is being מבזה המועדים like עובד עכו”ם ? ( see  רמב”ם above &, מהרש”א, and מאירי )

Makkos22B

Makkos23A

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22B: Mishna Over Aveira, Gemara ViHaTanya and Mishna Kama Malkin… (12/03/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3990″]

Download Here

Very quickly review :גמרא כב from second set of two dots until the משנה.

Questions:

According to the ריב”ן

  • What is the חילק between being reevaluated on the same day as the first evaluation or on a later date?
  • Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes if there was an underestimation in the original evaluation ?
  • Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes when the reevaluation is done on a later date and its clear he can endure the full amount contrary to the original evaluation which said he can only endure part of the 39?

Continue learning the משנה and גמרא including the second משנה until the bottom of the עמוד

Point to ponder:
  • When the נלקה is evaluated that he can endure 42 lashes we consider it as getting 2 sets if lashes.
  • Is this only for one action that is a violation of 2 לאוין or even for 2 individual violations of 2 לאוין ?  See ערל”נ

Questions:

  • Why does the חזן  rip the shirt of the נלקה ? See ריטב”א
  • When the מלקה adds an extra lash resulting in the death of the נלקה the  מלקה go to גלות. Why? גלות. Is only for an accident? This is negligence? (See ריבן , ריטב”א )

Makkos22B

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22B: Rabi Yehuda Omer Arbaim Shleimos…: Amar R’ Yitzchak Mai Taima DiRabi Yehuda… (12/01/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3973″]

Download Here

Learn :גמרא כב from first set of two dots until  משנה.

Question:
According to the ריב”ן
  • What is the חילק between being reevaluated on the same day as the first evaluation or on a later date?
  • Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes if there was an underestimation in the original evaluation ?
  • Why does the נלקה not need to endure his full share of lashes when the reevaluation is done on a later date and its clear he can endure the full amount contrary to the original evaluation which said he can only endure part of the 39?
Point to ponder:
  • According to רבי יהודה when the נלקה can only endure part of the 39 lashes would he still receive one or more lashes בין כתיפיו?
  • According to רבי יהודה when the נלקה can only endure 20 lashes, will he receive 2 lashes בין כתיפיו?  (The ערל”נ “דכתיב” and “אשר” discusses these two questions)

Continue learning the משנה and גמרא until the second משנה on the עמוד

Makkos22B

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22B: Mai Taima Ee Ksiv Arbaim BiMispar… (11/26/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3923″]

Download Here

Very quickly review .משנה כב and :גמרא כב until first set of two dots.

The ראשונים seem to give an entirely different reason then the גמרא
why we only give 39 lashes when the תורה says 40 (See ריטב”א , and רמב”ם ה’ סנהדרין י”ז,א )

Questions:

  • How can they give a different reason then the גמרא?
  • What is a נפקא מיניה between the explanations? (See “ערוך לנר “בצרו )
  • Why does רש”י דברים כ”ה,ג give a different explanation then the גמרא ?
Continue learning the גמרא until the next משנה
Question:
  • Our גמרא says a ת”ח is greater then a ס”ת. Learn “גמרא קידושין לג. “איבעיא  which seems to say just the opposite. ( ר” ן שם  and מהרש”א here in Makkos )

Makkos22B

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22A to 22B: Amar Rav Hoshiya… (11/24/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3879″]

Download Here

Learn .גמרא כב  from “אמר רב הושעיא ” (three lines before the משנה) until the משנה

Question:
  • What is the כלאים in the case of שור פסולי מוקדשין ? (Three explanations ריב”ן “המרביע”, תוס’ ” שהרי”, ריטב”א “אמר )

Learn משנה and :גמרא כב  until first set of two dots.

The גמרא explains why we only give 39 lashes when the תורה says 40 from the way the תורה writes the order of the words in the פסוק.
Learn the ראשונים who seem to give an entirely different reason then the גמרא
See ריטב”א , and רמב”ם ה’ סנהדרין י”ז,א
Points to ponder:
  • How can they give a different reason then the גמרא?
  • What is a נפקא מיניה between the explanations?
– On previous גמרא:
The גמרא concludes משנה does not hold of איסור כולל .
  • So how could יו”ט be חל on שמיטה?
  • How could נזיר be חל on כהן?

Makkos22A

Makkos22B

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22A: Amar Leih Rav Zeira LiRabi Manee ViLichshov Nami… (11/19/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3857″]

Download Here

Learn .גמרא כב  from  אמר רבי זעירא ” (three lines before the wide lines ) until the משנה

Learn Rashi for introduction to  איסור כולל and  איסור מוסיף.

Learn תוס’ “מנהיג

Question:
  • Why did the גמרא ask from שבועה now after we already realized the משנה did not mention every option of לאו?
  • The גמרא concludes משנה does not hold of איסור כולל . So how could יו”ט be חל on שמיטה?
  • How could נזיר be חל on כהן?

Makkos22A

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 22A: ViHuTunee Rabi Chiya Lokeh Shtayim Al Acheeluso… (11/17/14)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3818″]

Download Here

Learn .גמרא כב  from the two dots until “אמר רב הושעיא ” (three lines before the משנה)
Learn “ריטב”א כב. “וליחשוב who explains how these violations are committed at the same time of plowing

Question:

The גמרא lists many additional לאוין that one could violate while plowing.  How does the גמרא answer why they are not included in the list of the משנה?  Learn “תוס’ ” מתקיף

Makkos22A

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 21B: Aisevei Abaye… (11/12/2014)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3779″]

Download Here

Learn :גמרא כא from “איתביה אביי ” (end of the first wide line) until the first set of two dots on . דף כב
Learn “ריטב”א כא: “אמר רבא explains the case of אין חילוק מלאכות ביו” ט
Learn “ערוך לנר כב. “משום הבערה

Question:
  • Why does the  גמרא not ask to add on מלקות for working land on שביעית ? Learn “ריטב”א כא: “ולילקי

Makkos21B

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 21B: Amar Lei Ulla LiRav Nachman… (11/10/2014

[jwplayer mediaid=”3750″]

Download Here

Learn :גמרא כא from “אמר ליה עולא ” (four lines before the wide lines) until דף כב. “א”ל  (end of seventh line)

Questions:
  • Why does the  גמרא not ask to add on מלקות for working land on שביעית ? See ריטב”א
  • Why does the  גמרא not ask to add on מלקות for violating יום כיפור ? See שאגת אריה
  • How could “רש”י “ואין חילוק say case is one violated two or three melochos בהעלם אחד .  Big problem: העלמה is used in context for culpability of a קרבן  , but there is no קרבן for violating יום טוב ?

Makkos21B

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 21B: Yaish Choreish Telem Echas (11/05/2014)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3699″]

Download Here

Learn ” גמרא כא: “יש חורש until ” אמר ליה עולא ” (four lines before the wide lines)

Questions:
What is the case of המקיים כלאים?
How could ר”ע hold המקיים כלאים is חייב מלקות but it’s a לאו שאין בו מעשה ?  Learn “תוס’ ד: “הא and for an answer.

Learn  רש”י מועד קטן ב: “אף
How does רש”י answer the question above?
Makkos21B

Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Makkos 21B: In Depth Discussion of Machlokes Rav Bibi and Rav Ashi Regarding Klayim (11/03/2014)

[jwplayer mediaid=”3663″]

Download Here

Review very quickly  “גמרא כא: “אמר רב ביבי until the two dots

Questions:

According to רב אשי a person is חייב מלקות for just leaving the כלאים on himself for a certain amount of time.
  • Why? This is a לאו שאין בו מעשה which the רבנן hold אין לוקין ? Learn the “נמוקי יוסף ” אפ’ לא שהה (bottom of the ריף) and  “ריטב”א “אמר רב ביבי
  • Is the ריטבא explanation the same as the נמוקי יוסף ?
  {Extra – Last week we discussed does רב ביבי disagree with רב אשי ? See ” תוס’ שבועות יז. “א  Does רב אשי disagree with רב ביבי  ? (See ערוך לנר) }
Learn next גמרא until ” אמר ליה עולא ” (four lines before the wide lines)
Questions:
  • How could ר”ע hold המקיים כלאים is חייב מלקות but its a לאו שאין בו מעשה ?  See תוס’ ד: “הא for an answer.
Learn רש” י מועד קטן ב: “אף.
  • How does  רש” י  answer this question?