How do we conclude lhalacha? Do we rule like Rabanan or like Chanania?
Review שולחן ערוך ס’ רנ”ג סע’ א which brings two opinions.
Question:
According to which opinion does the מחבר conclude?
Bring a proof
Learn the Mishna Berura
Is the רמ”א concluding the halcha is in accordance with Chanania or saying that if one follows the accepted Minhag like Chanania it is Ok, but really should follow like Rabanan?
Learn ביאור הלכה “ונהגו להקל כסברא אחרונה And הגהות חזון איש on the ביאור הלכה who argue what is the ruling of the רא”ש
The רא”ש first brings the ruling of the רי”ף who rules like the Rabanan and all of the proofs of the רי”ף. (We went through most of those proofs when we learnt the רי”ף) The רא”ש then brings the opinion of רש”י and the ר”י who rules like Chanania.
The רא”ש then quotes the בעל המאור who also rules like Chanania and refutes all the proofs of the רי”ף (we learnt some of the refutations in the ר”ן)
The רא”ש then brings ר’ יהודה הברצלוני & שאילתות דרב אחאי גאון who rule like the רי”ף and goes through each refutation of the בעל המאור and explains why it is not a valid refutation.
In conclusion the רא”ש says “ובשביל שרבו דעות בהאי פיסקא “
Questions:
What is the רא”ש halachic conclusion? Does he rule like Chanania or really rules like the Rabanan just says one can not object to those who follow the ruling of Chanania?
Does the Rambam rule like the Rabanan or like Chanania?
How do we conclude lhalacha?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ רנ”ג סע’ א which brings two opinions how to rule.
According to which opinion does the מחבר conclude?
Bring a proof
Learn Mishna Berura
Is the רמ”א concluding to like Chanania or saying that if one follows the accepted Minhag like Chanania it is Ok, but really should follow like Rabanan?
Learn ביאור הלכה “ונהגו להקל כסברא אחרונה And הגהות חזון איש on the ביאור הלכה who argue what is the ruling of the רא”ש
The רא”ש first brings the ruling of the רי”ף who rules like the Rabanan and all of the proofs of the רי”ף. (We went through most of those proofs when we learnt the רי”ף) The רא”ש then brings the opinion of רש”י and the ר”י who rules like Chanania.
The רא”ש then quotes the בעל המאור who also rules like Chanania and refutes all the proofs of the רי”ף (we learnt some of the refutations in the ר”ן)
The רא”ש then brings ר’ יהודה הברצלוני & שאילתות דרב אחאי גאון who rule like the רי”ף and goes through each refutation of the בעל המאור and explains why it is not a valid refutation.
In conclusion the רא”ש says “ובשביל שרבו דעות בהאי פיסקא “
Questions:
What is the רא”ש halachic conclusion? Does he rule like Chanania or really rules like the Rabanan just says one can not object to those who follow the ruling of Chanania?
Does the Rambam rule like the Rabanan or like Chanania?
How do we conclude lhalacha?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ רנ”ג סע’ א which brings two opinions how to rule.
According to which opinion does the מחבר conclude?
Bring a proof
Learn Mishna Berura
Is the רמ”א concluding to like Chanania or saying that if one follows the accepted Minhag like Chanania it is Ok, but really should follow like Rabanan?
Learn ביאור הלכה “ונהגו להקל כסברא אחרונה And הגהות חזון איש on the ביאור הלכה who argue what is the ruling of the רא”ש
Review עמק ברכה, הגדה אות א or חידושי ר’ חיים פסחים דף קטז which explains there are three aspects unique to the mitzvah of סיפור יציאת מצרים on Seder night.
List a few נפקא מינה between the reason of Tosfos and the reason of Rambam
Is there a connection between these three aspects?
Learn גמרא פסחים דף קטז “אמר רב נחמן לדרו ( עבדיה (before the second Mishna)
How did this exempt them from saying the mah nishtana?
Why does the Rambam cite the pasuk זכור את היום הזה אשר יצאתם ממצרים as the source for the mitzvah of סיפור יציאת מצרים on Seder night and not the pasuk of והגדת לבנך?
Is the mitzvah of סיפור יציאת מצרים to ones child an independent mitzvah or part of the mitzvah of סיפור יציאת מצרים?
Learn עמק ברכה, הגדה אות א or חידושי ר’ חיים פסחים דף קטז which explains there are three aspects unique to the mitzvah of סיפור יציאת מצרים on Seder night.
List a few נפקא מינה between the reason of Tosfos and the reason of Rambam
Is there a connection between these three aspects?
Learn גמרא פסחים דף קטז “אמר רב נחמן לדרו ( עבדיה (before the second Mishna)
How did this exempt them from saying the mah nishtana?
Why does the Rambam cite the pasuk זכור את היום הזה אשר יצאתם ממצרים as the source for the mitzvah of סיפור יציאת מצרים on Seder night and not the pasuk of והגדת לבנך?
Is the mitzvah of סיפור יציאת מצרים to ones child an independent mitzvah or part of the mitzvah of סיפור יציאת מצרים?
Why does the Rambam cite the pasuk זכור את היום הזה אשר יצאתם ממצרים as the source for the mitzvah of סיפור יציאת מצרים on Seder night and not the pasuk of והגדת לבנך?
Is the mitzvah of סיפור יציאת מצרים to ones child an independent mitzvah or part of the mitzvah of סיפור יציאת מצרים?
Review the גמרא דף לז. “איבעיא להו until “ת”ש (fifth wide line) until
גמרא דף לח. “איבעיא להו (twelve lines from bottom of the Amud) Question: Is the question of the Gemara whether סמיכה is permitted by שהייה or by חזרה? Learn תוס’ “מהו If the question of the Gemara is in regards to חזרה what is the proof from the braissa which only discusses שהייה? Learn רי”ף which brings a proof from this question that the halacha is like רבנןLearn רשב”א for a different explanation of the question of the Gemara
Clarify the three explanations of the Gemara question
1. Tosfos
2. Rif
3. Rashba
Review the first half of תוס’ “אא”ב and continue learning the rest of Tosfos
Questions:
What’s the point of argument between Rashi and Tosfos?
What compelled Rashi to explain differently than the simple explanation offered by Tosfos?