Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Category: Eruvin
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek יום רביעי Av 10, end of the Perek (08/14/24)
City Eruvin
Does a body of water larger than a בית סאתים disqualify a city eruv?
What type of water is מבטל שם דירה?
What type of water is considered לא חזי לתשמישתא ?
How deep does the water need to be?
Learn שולחן ערוך אורח חיים ס’ שנ”ח סע’ י”א with משנה ברורה and “ביאור הלכה “והוא
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=43
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=44
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=45
If the water is ten Tefachim deep why doesn’t the wall of the lake act as a mechitza and separate the lake from the rest of the area outside of it?
Learn מגן אברהם ס’ שנ”ח ס”ק טו
And ביאור הלכה “דינים
Is the duck pond in the middle of the Passaic Park considered like זרעים / garden and is מבטל שם דירה thereby prohibiting to carry inside the entire Passaic eruv as it is פרוץ למקום האסור לו – open to area that one may not carry?
See ספר ה’ עירובין פרק ט ס’ ב אות ג
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek יום חמישי Av 4 (08/08/24)
City Eruvin
Do the following areas larger than a בית סאתים disqualify a city eruv?
Park
See שו”ת אגרות משה או”ח חלק א ס’ קלט (the beginning)
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=916&st=&pgnum=232
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=916&st=&pgnum=233
And שו”ת מנחת יצחק חלק ז’ ס’ כד
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=1600&st=&pgnum=51
See ספר יוסיף חן ס’ כא
Zoo
See שו”ת נודע ביהודה או”ח תנינא ס’ מז
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=1447&pgnum=28
And קובץ תשובות חלק א ס’ מה
Cemetery
See קובץ תשובות חלק א ס’ מה
And Laws of an Eruv from Rabbi Francis & Rabbi Francis Chapter 9 end of section II who quotes a the ruling of Hagaon Rabbi Moshe Feinstein.
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek יום רביעי, Av 3, end of the Perek (08/07/24)
City Eruvin
Halacha question –
Do farms larger than a בית סאתים disqualify a city eruv?
Quickly review ביאור הלכה ס’ שנ”ח סע’ ט’ “אבל אם who brings a ת’ דבר שמואל for a new reason why a city eruv can include with קרפף inside of it.
What is the reason of the דבר שמואל that a קרפף inside a walled city will not disqualify the Eruv?
See חכם צבי ס’ נט
And Laws of an Eruv from Rabbi Francis & Rabbi Francis Chapter 9/II/2 who quotes a different explanation in the name of Hagaon Rabbi Moshe Feinstein.
What’s a halachik difference between the two reasons?
Would a halachik wall made from צורת הפתח also be included in the chidush of the דבר שמואל?
Do we rely on the דבר שמואל?
See ספר יוסיף חן ס’ כג
Do the following areas larger than a בית סאתים disqualify a city eruv?
Botanical Gardens
See שו”ת דברי חיים או”ח ס’ כח
And שו”ת שואל ומשיב מהדו”ק ס’ קלא
And שו”ת מנחת יצחק חלק ח’ ס’ קח
Forests
See שולחן ערוך או”ח ס’ שנ”ח סע’ ט’
See ספר יוסיף חן ס’ כב
Parks
See שו”ת אגרות משה או”ח חלק א ס’ קלט (the beginning)
And שו”ת מנחת יצחק חלק ז’ ס’ כד
See ספר יוסיף חן ס’ כא
Zoo
See שו”ת נודע ביהודה או”ח תנינא ס’ מז
And קובץ תשובות חלק א ס’ מה
Cemeteries
See קובץ תשובות חלק א ס’ מה
And Laws of an Eruv from Rabbi Francis & Rabbi Francis Chapter 9 end of section II who quotes a the ruling of Hagaon Rabbi Moshe Feinstein.
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום שלישי Av 2, Daf 26b (08/06/24)
Topic for this week:
City Eruvin
Halacha question –
Do parks or wooded areas larger that a בית סאתים disqualify a city eruv?
Yesterday we learnt the תוספת ישנים underneath “תוספת דף כג: “איכא and the רא”ש פרק ב’ ס’ ב “ומתוך פ’ רש”י (approximately 20 lines before end) that according to Rashi gardens only destroy דירה for a קרפף but not for a חצר
However the שולחן ערוך ס’ שנ”ח סע’ ט & י rules there is no difference.
Learn ביאור הלכה ס’ שנ”ח סע’ ט’ “אבל אם who brings a ת’ דבר שמואל for a new reason why a city eruv can include with קרפף inside of it.
Based on the above would a city eruv be permitted to include park or wooden area?
What is the reason the דבר שמואל that קרפף inside a walled city will not disqualify the Eruv?
See חכם צבי ס’ נט
And Laws of Eruvin from Rabbi Francis who quoted a different explanation in the name of Hagaon Rabbi Moshe Feinstein
Would a halachik wall made from צורת הפתח also be included in the chidush of the דבר שמואל?
Do we rely on the דבר שמואל?
See ספר יוסיף חן ס’ כג
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום שני Rosh Chodesh Av, Daf 26b (08/05/24)
Question:
Does רב ששת (who explained the opinions of ר”א and the רבנן ) disagree with רב פפא who entertains new considerations regarding splitting a courtyard and a house?
Learn מהרש”א
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=299
Learn קרן אורה who disagrees with the מהרש”א
Topic for this week:
City Eruvin
Halacha question –
Do parks or wooded areas larger that a בית סאתים disqualify a city eruv?
Learn תוספת ישנים underneath “תוספת דף כג: “איכא (in Rashi script)
Learn רא”ש פרק ב’ ס’ ב starting from the words “ומתוך פ’ רש”י (approximately 20 lines before end)
Clarify the chidush of the תוספת ישנם and the ספק of the רא”ש
Based on the above would a city eruv be permitted to include park or wooden area?
How do we conclude l’halacha?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ שנ”ח סע’ ט & י with משנה ברורה
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום חמישי Tamuz 26, Daf 26b (08/01/24)
Review “גמרא דף כו: “א”ל רב פפא לאביי” (middle of the Amud) until the two dots.
Questions:
What does רב ששת (who explained the opinions of ר”א and the רבנן ) hold in regards to these new considerations being introduced whether a person lives in a house without having rights in the courtyard?
Learn מהרש”א
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=299
Learn קרן אורה who disagrees with the מהרש”א
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום רביעי Tamuz 25, Daf 26b (07/31/24)
Learn “גמרא דף כו: “כמאן אזלא” (ten lines from top of Amud) until the two dots.
Questions:
What does רב ששת (who explained the opinions of ר”א and the רבנן ) hold in regards to these new considerations being introduced whether a person lives in a house without having rights in the courtyard?
Learn מהרש”א
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום שלישי Tamuz 24, Daf 26b (07/30/24)
Very quickly review “גמרא דף כו: “כשתימצי לומר (top of the Amud) until “כמאן אזלא” (ten lines from top of Amud)
Questions:
Can the מבטל renege his ביטול?
How can the residents lock in the ביטול?
How do we conclude l’halacha?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ ש”פ סע’ א and the משנה ברורה
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=111
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=112
(also see ס’ שפ”א סע’ א)
In case where the person is only מבטל his rights in the courtyard. The מבטל is permitted to carry items from the other residents houses to the courtyard. However he is not allowed to carry items from his own house to the courtyard.
We learnt a Machlokes between רש”י and רבינו יהונתן
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=348
See ריטב”א for נפקא מינה between the two explanations.
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9610&st=&pgnum=150
Learn רשב”א who brings a different reason from the ראב”ד why the מבטל is not allowed to carry items from his own house to the courtyard.
Note: The ראב”ד understanding of ביטל of ones house
How do we conclude lehalacha?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ ש”פ סע’ ב and the משנה ברורה
Can the מבטל carry items from the other residents homes to the courtyard before they made a chazaka in the courtyard?
See ביאור הלכה “וגם
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום שני Tamuz 23, Daf 26b (07/29/24)
Review “גמרא דף כו: “כשתימצי לומר (top of the Amud) until “כמאן אזלא” (ten lines from top of Amud)
Questions:
What is the point of dispute between ר”א and the רבנן in regards to being מבטל ones home, and whether one needs to specify that he is being מבטל to each individual?
According to the Rabanan –
If the person who did not participate in the Eruv was מבטל to only one of the residents of the Chatzer and then the residents made an Eruv together. Would all the residents be permitted to carry from their homes to the courtyard?
Bring a proof from רש”י כו: “לא נצרכה
Learn ביאור הלכה ס’ ש”פ סע’ א “צריך
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=112
According to the Rabanan –
If the מבטל says “my רשות” instead of “my chatzer” is בטל to you, will the house be included in the ביטול?
If the מבטל says “לכולכם” – to all of you. Is that sufficient to be considered he was מבטל to each resident personally?
Can the מבטל renege his ביטול?
How can the residents lock in the ביטול?
How do we conclude l’halacha?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ ש”פ סע’ א and the משנה ברורה
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=111
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=112
(also see ס’ שפ”א סע’ א)
In case where the person is only מבטל his rights in the courtyard. The מבטל is permitted to carry items from the other residents houses to the courtyard. However he is not allowed to carry items from his own house to the courtyard.
Why?
Learn רש”י
Learn רבינו יהונתן who gives a different explanation than Rashi
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=348
If the other residents of the courtyard made a Chazaka after the person was מבטל his rights in the courtyard. May he now carry from his house into the courtyard?
Learn ריטב”א
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9610&st=&pgnum=150
Learn רשב”א who brings a different reason from the ראב”ד why the מבטל is not allowed to carry items from his own house to the courtyard.
How do we conclude l’halacha?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ ש”פ סע’ א and the משנה ברורה
In case where the person is also מבטל his rights in his house in addition to the courtyard. Is the מבטל permitted to carry items from his own house to the courtyard? Why or why not?
Does it matter if the other residents made a chazaka in the courtyard?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ ש”פ סע’ ב and the משנה ברורה
Can the מבטל carry items from the other residents homes to the courtyard before they made a chazaka in the courtyard?
See ביאור הלכה “וגם
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום חמישי Tamuz 19, Daf 26a-26b (07/25/24)
Very quickly review “גמרא דף כו. “וכן שמעתי (two dots – four lines from bottom of the Amud) until “כמאן אזלא
The Mishna teaches us that if a Jew did not participate in the Eruv Chatzeros he can be מבטל- relinquish his rights in the Chatzer and thereby permit everyone to carry from their homes to the chatzer.
In case where the person is only מבטל his rights in the courtyard. The מבטל is permitted to carry items from the other residents houses to the courtyard. However he is not allowed to carry items from his own house to the courtyard.
Why?
Learn רש”י
Learn רבינו יהונתן who gives a different explanation than Rashi
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=348
If the other residents of the courtyard made a Chazaka after the person was מבטל his rights in the courtyard. May he now carry from his house into the courtyard?
Learn ריטב”א
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9610&st=&pgnum=150
Learn רשב”א who brings a different reason from the ראב”ד why the מבטל is not allowed to carry items from his own house to the courtyard.
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37275&st=&pgnum=30
How do we conclude l’halacha?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ ש”פ סע’ א and the משנה ברורה
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=111
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=112
In case where the person is also מבטל his rights in his house in addition to the courtyard. Is the מבטל permitted to carry items from his own house to the courtyard? Why or why not?
Does it matter if the other residents made a chazaka in the courtyard?
Learn שולחן ערוך ס’ ש”פ סע’ ב and the משנה ברורה
Can the מבטל carry items from the other residents homes to the courtyard before they made a chazaka in the courtyard?
See ביאור הלכה “וגם
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום רביעי Tamuz 18, Daf 26a-26b (07/24/24)
Introduction to next Gemara – Learn משנה דף סט עמוד ב
Learn “גמרא דף כו. “וכן שמעתי (two dots – four lines from bottom of the Amud) until “כמאן אזלא
The Mishna teaches us that if a Jew did not participate in the Eruv Chatzeros he can be מבטל- relinquish his rights in the Chatzer and thereby permit everyone to carry from their homes to the chatzer.
Is it permissible for them to carry items from the מבטל house to the courtyard?
Is it permissible for the מבטל to;
Carry items from his own house to the courtyard?
Carry items from their homes to the courtyard?
Learn רש”י
Learn רבינו יהונתן who gives a different explanation than Rashi
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=348
What’s a נפקא מינה between Rashi and the רבינו יהונתן?
Learn ריטב”א who brings a third explanation from the ראב”ד
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9610&st=&pgnum=150
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום שני Tamuz 16 Daf 26a (07/22/24)
Review משנה דף כג
Review משנה דף כג
Learn the גמרא דף כו.”א”ר אלעאי שמעתי מר”א” (two dots – middle of the Amud) until “וכן שמעתי (two dots – four lines from bottom of the Amud)
Questions:
Who is ר”א arguing on?
Learn ריטב”א “א”ר אלעאי
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9610&st=&pgnum=150
What does it mean our Mishna is not like חנניה?
Learn ריטב”א “מתניתן & ושניהם for two explanations
The Gemara concludes that one should not set up a Yeshiva at the entrance of a sick person for the reason דילמא אתי לאיגרויי ביה השטן
Questions:
Who will the Satan start up with?
See רש”י “שטן
Why did Chizkayahu set up the Yeshiva by the backdoor of Chizkiyahu palace and not by the front door?
Since the Gemara concludes it is not a good idea to place a Yeshiva at the entrance of a sick person; Why did Yeshaya set one up at the entrance of Chizkiyahu palace?
Learn ריטב”א “ולא היא
Learn מהרש”א who gives a different explanation
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=299
Learn הגהות ראמ”ה (in back of the Gemara)
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=467
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום חמישי Tamuz 12 Daf 26a (07/18/24)
Learn the גמרא דף כו.”דהא רבה בר אבוה” until the two dots
Clarify
What the picture is of the case of פירא דבי תורא?
Why did רבה בר אבוה only make an Eruv around each street and not for the entire city?
Learn רש”י
Learn תוס’ “דבי תורא
How is the picture of Tosfos of the case of פירא דבי תורא different than Rashi?
Learn ריטב”א who explains Rashi and Tosfos
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9610&st=&pgnum=150
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום רביעי Tamuz 11, Daf 26a (07/17/24)
Quickly review the “גמרא דף כו.”איתיביה רבינא until “דהא רבה בר אבוה” – focus on the understanding of the three questions that were asked to רבא
If the fencing was built around the area with the intent to build housing inside is that considered הוקף לדירה ?
Learn “ריטב”א דף כה: “אתא רבא (starting from the words איתיביה רבינא)
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9610&st=&pgnum=149
Learn רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק טז הלכה ה & מגיד משנה
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=67
What are מחיצות העשוי הצניעות?
Why are these mechitzos not valid?
See “רש”י דף כו.”כיון דלצניעותא
What are מחיצות העשוי לנחת?
Why are מחיצות העשוי לנחת not considered mechitzas?
See “רש”י דף כו.”לנחת
Why would this be a reason to disqualify it from being a Mechitza. Aren’t most mechitzas made to store items inside of them?
See תורת חיים
In regards to what Halachos are they not considered mechitzos?
Learn רא”ש ס’ ו
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=235
Learn רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק טז הלכה טו
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=70
Note the wording of the Rambam when he mentions מחיצות העשוי לנחת
See ה’ הראב”ד on side of the Rambam
What is implied by the difference in the wording of the Rambam?
Learn מגיד משנה
(See מהרש”א על תוס’ ההוא אוונקרא & הגהות והערות on מהרש”א )
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=299
Continue learning the גמרא דף כו.”דהא רבה בר אבוה” until the two dots
Clarify
What the picture is of the case of פירא דבי תורא?
Why did רבה בר אבוה only make an Eruv around each street and not for the entire city?
Learn רש”י
Learn תוס’ “דבי תורא
How is the picture of Tosfos of the case of פירא דבי תורא different than Rashi?
Learn ריטב”א
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום שני Tamuz 9, Daf 25b-26a (07/16/24)
Questions:
According to תוס and the תשובות הגאונים –
Did the posts permit carrying just in the אוונקרא or the entire orchard?
See הגהות תוס’ ישנים on side of תוס
See ריטב”א דף כה: “א”ל ריש גלותא
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9610&st=&pgnum=149
Review the “גמרא דף כו.”איתיביה רבינא until “דהא רבה בר אבוה” – focus on the understanding of the three questions that were asked to רבא
If the fencing was built around the area with the intent to build housing inside is that considered הוקף לדירה ?
Learn “ריטב”א דף כה: “אתא רבא (starting from the words איתיביה רבינא)
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9610&st=&pgnum=149
Learn רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק טז הלכה ה & מגיד משנה
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=67
What are מחיצות העשוי הצניעות?
Why are these mechitzos not valid?
See “רש”י דף כו.”כיון דלצניעותא
What are מחיצות העשוי לנחת?
Why are מחיצות העשוי לנחת not considered mechitzas?
See “רש”י דף כו.”לנחת
Why would this be a reason to disqualify it from being a Mechitza. Aren’t most mechitzas made to store items inside of them?
See תורת חיים
In regards to what Halachos are they not considered mechitzos?
Learn רא”ש ס’ ו
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=235
Learn רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק טז הלכה טו
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=70
Note the wording of the Rambam when he mentions מחיצות העשוי לנחת
See ה’ הראב”ד on side of the Rambam
What is implied by the difference in the wording of the Rambam?
Learn מגיד משנה
(See מהרש”א על תוס’ ההוא אוונקרא & הגהות והערות on מהרש”א )
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=299
Continue learning the גמרא דף כו.”דהא רבה בר אבוה” until the two dots
Clarify
What the picture is of the case of פירא דבי תורא?
Why did רבה בר אבוה only make an Eruv around each street and not for the entire city?
Learn רש”י
Learn תוס’ “דבי תורא
Learn ריטב”א
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום שני Tamuz 9, Daf 25b-26a (07/15/24)
Review תוס’ דף כה: “ההוא אבוורנקא
Questions:
According to תוס and the תשובות הגאונים
Did the posts permit carrying just in the אוונקרא or the entire orchard?
See הגהות תוס’ ישנים on תוס
See ריטב”א דף כה: “א”ל ריש גלותא
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9610&st=&pgnum=149
Why did רבא remove the posts?
Review the “גמרא דף כו. ” איתביה רבינא until the two dots – focus on the understanding of the three questions that were asked to רבא
If the fencing was built around the area with the intent to build housing inside is that considered הוקף לדירה ?
Learn ריטב”א דף כה: “אתא רבא (starting from the words איתביה רבינא)
Learn רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק טז הלכה ה & מגיד משנה
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=67
What are מחיצות העשוי הצניעות?
Why are these mechitzos not valid?
What are מחיצות העשוי לנחת?
Why are מחיצות העשוי לנחת not considered mechitzos? Aren’t most mechitzos made to store items inside of them?
See תורת חיים (attached)
In regards to what Halachos are they not considered mechitzos?
Learn רא”ש ס’ ו
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=235
Learn רמב”ם ה’ שבת פרק טז הלכה טו & מגיד משנה
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14278&st=&pgnum=70
(See מהרש”א על תוס’ ההוא אוונקרא & הגהות והערות on מהרש”א )
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37954&st=&pgnum=299
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום חמישי Tamuz 5, Daf 25b-26a (07/11/24)
Very quickly review the “גמרא דף כה: ” ההיא אבוורנקא (four lines from bottom of the amud) until דף כו (two dots) – (do not focus today on the understanding of the three questions that were asked to רבא)
Focus on “רש”י דף כו. “להרע who presents an entirely new explanation in the Gemara from the תשובות הגאונים
Learn תוס’ “ההוא אבוורנקא
What are the differences between how Rashi and the תשובות הגאונים explain
1. Where it was prohibited to carry and why?
2. Where did רב הונא בר חיננא install the posts?
3. How did it permit carrying?
4. Why did רבא remove the posts?
5. Does רב פפא & רב הונא בריה דרב יהושע agree with רבא or argue with him?
6. What did the ריש גלותא mean when he said וחכמים המה להרע ולהיטיב לא ידעו
Why does Rashi favor the explanation of the תשובות הגאונים more than the explanation that he gave?
See תוס’ ר’ פרץ (towards the end)(attached)
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום רביעי Tamuz 4, Daf 25b-26a (07/10/24)
Review the “גמרא דף כה: ” ההיא אבוורנקא (four lines from bottom of the amud) until דף כו (two dots) – (do not focus today on the understanding of the three questions that were asked to רבא)
Learn the רש”י דף כו. “להרע who presents an entirely new explanation in the Gemara from the תשובות הגאונים
What are the differences between how Rashi and the תשובות הגאונים explain
1. Where it was prohibited to carry and why?
2. Where did רב הונא בר חיננא install the posts?
3. How did it permit carrying?
4. Why did רבא remove the posts?
5. Does רב פפא & רב הונא בריה דרב יהושע agree with רבא or argue with him?
6. What did the ריש גלותא mean when he said וחכמים המה להרע ולהיטיב לא ידעו
Why does Rashi favor the explanation of the תשובות הגאונים more than the explanation that he gave?
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום שלישי Tamuz 3, Daf 25b-26a (07/09/24)
Learn the “גמרא דף כה: ” ההיא אבוורנקא (four lines from bottom of the amud) until דף כו (two dots)
Clarify where it was prohibited to carry and why?
What did רב הונא בר חיננא do and how did it permit carrying?
Why did Rava remove the posts?
Did רב פפא & רב הונא בריה דרב יהושע agree with Rava or argue with him?
Learn the רש”י דף כו. “להרע which gives an entirely new explanation in the Gemara
Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Eruvin: Second Perek, יום שני Tamuz 2, Daf 25b-26a (07/08/24)
Conclusion of Sugya : “גמרא דף כ”ה: “ההוא בוסתנא
Questions:
Why does Tosfos explain the case differently from Rashi?
How do we conclude l’halacha? like Rashi or Tosfos?
Learn שולחן ערוך או”ח ס’ שנ”ח סע’ יד and the משנה ברורה
https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60389&st=&pgnum=45
According to Tosfos explanation of the conclusion of the Gemara
What is the status of a קרפף יותר מבית סאתים that has a house inside of it. If the house is destroyed does the Karfef remain permitted to carry inside of?
See ביאור הלכה ס’ שנ”ח סע’ יד “חוזר
Learn the “גמרא דף כ”ה: ” ההיא אבוורנקא (four lines from bottom of the amud) until דף כו (two dots)
Clarify where it was prohibited to carry and why?
What did רב הונא בר חיננא do and how did it permit carrying?
Why did Rava remove the posts?
Did רב פפא & רב הונא בריה דרב יהושע agree with Rava or argue with him?
Learn the רש”י דף כו. “להרע which gives an entirely new explanation in the Gemara