Learn the Gemara from after the Mishna until the two dots.
Questions:
A vertical fence that has gaps is a valid mechitza if it is עמוד מרובה as the gaps are considered פתחים – points of access. What is the logic to entertain allowing horizontal gaps?
Our Gemara is uncertain whether we consider עומד מרובה משתי רוחות a valid mechitza. How is this consistent with the גמרא דף י עמוד ב which seems to conclude it is a valid mechitza?
Learn the Gemara from after the Mishna until the two dots.
Questions:
A vertical fence that has gaps is a valid mechitza if it is עמוד מרובה as the gaps are considered פתחים – points of access. What is the logic to entertain allowing horizontal gaps?
Our Gemara is uncertain whether we consider עומד מרובה משתי רוחות a valid mechitza. How is this consistent with the גמרא דף י עמוד ב which seems to conclude it is a valid mechitza?
The Gemara concludes that the halacha is in accordance with רב פפא that פרוץ כעומד מותר. Is there a difference in the concept of עומד מרובה to פרוץ כעומד מותר?
What is the meaning of “מיד תינוקות שומטין את לולביהן ואוכלין אתרוגיהן
Rashi explains the adults would grab the Lulavim and Esrogim from the hands of the children.
Why is this not a violation of stealing?
Rashi says because this was done in the spirit of simcha.
How does the spirit of simcha absolve one from the violation of stealing?
Learn “תוספת “מיד
Who applies this leniency to other scenarios in which damage occurs while engaged in activities in the spirit of simcha. and offers an alternate explanation in the Mishna.
See שולחן ערוך אורח חיים ס’ תרצ”ה רמ”א סוף סעיף ב “וי”א דאם הזיק and משנה ברורה ס”ק יג & יד
Learn the “גמרא דף מד: “אמר אייבו (eight lines from bottom of the Amud) until the two dots.
Questions:
What is the difference between the לישנא קמא and the לישנא בתרא?
Rashi explains the issue of concern for the halacha of traveling on Friday is the lack of food at one’s point of destination. Why does it matter the amount of distance one needs to travel even if one traveled less of a distance but arrived home close to Shabbos there would still be the same issue?
Does the same amount of limited distance apply if one is traveling by car or plane?
Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Learn the “גמרא דף מד: “אמר אייבו (middle of the Amud) until the next “אמר אייבו” (eight lines from bottom of the Amud)
Question:
What was so upright and special about the person that ר’ אלעזר בר צדוק gave him such praise?
Continue learning the Gemara until the two dots.
Questions:
What is the difference between the לישנא קמא and the לישנא בתרא?
Rashi explains the issue of concern for the halacha of traveling on Friday is the lack of food at one’s point of destination. Why does it matter the amount of distance one needs to travel even if one traveled less of a distance but arrived home close to Shabbos there would still be the same issue?
Does the same amount of limited distance apply if one is traveling by car or plane?
Learn שולחן ערוך או”ח ס’ רמ”ט סעיף א with the משנה ברורה
Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Quickly review the “גמרא דף מד: “אמר אייבו until next “אמר אייבו
Questions: In conclusion of the Gemara is the taking of Aravos on Hoshana Rabbah זכר למקדש or מנהג נביאים? What do we conclude lhalacha in regards to making a bracha on taking the Aravos? Learn טור אורח חיים ס’ תרס”ד סעיף ב for a few different opinions https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14268&st=&pgnum=595 And שולחן ערוך סע’ ב, ד-ו with the משנה ברורה for final conclusion https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=60391&st=&pgnum=271
Major Question: The גמרא דף מג concluded that Aravah was בנטילה – everyone waved the Aravos each day of Sukkos in the Beis Hamikdash and the זכר למקדש replicates the way it was performed in the Beis Hamikdash & on דף מד the aravos were taken when encircling the Mizbaich.
The gemara concluded that Hoshanos we’re instituted זכר למקדש for the נטילה which was walking around the mizbaich? Why is our minhag to walk around the bima each day of Sukkos with the set of Daled Minim one time and on Hoshana Rabbah seven times. We should be holding aravos as they did in the Beis Hamikdash when they circled the Mizbaich? See בית יוסף & ב”ח סעיף ג https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14268&st=&pgnum=595
The גמרא דף מג concluded that Aravah was בנטילה – everyone waved the Aravos each day of Sukkos in the Beis Hamikdash and the זכר למקדש replicates the way it was performed in the Beis Hamikdash & on דף מד the aravos were taken when encircling the Mizbaich.
Why is our minhag to walk around the bima each day of Sukkos one time only with the set of Daled Minim and on Hoshana Rabbah seven times. We should be holding aravos when circling the bima as they did in the Beis Hamikdash when circling the Mizbaich?
But this seems incongruent with how the Beis Hamikdash as on the practice Especially since we conclude that Hoshanos we’re instituted זכר למקדש for the נטילה which was walking around the mizbaich?
The גמרא דף מג concluded that Aravah was בנטילה – everyone waved the Aravos each day of Sukkos in the Beis Hamikdash and the זכר למקדש replicates the way it was performed in the Beis Hamikdash & on דף מד the aravos were taken when encircling the Mizbeach.
Why is our minhag to walk around the bima each day of Sukkos one time only with the set of Daled Minim and on Hoshana Rabbah seven times. We should be holding aravos when circling the bima as they did in the Beis Hamikdash when circling the Mizbeach?
But this seems incongruent with how the Beis Hamikdash as on the practice Especially since we conclude that Hoshanos we’re instituted זכר למקדש for the נטילה which was walking around the mizbeach?
How could ר’ אבהו answer the contradiction of whether Aravah is a יסוד נביאים or הלכה למשה מסיני when the Gemara Temura clearly says one can not ask through prophecy to be taught forgotten halachos?
Learn חידושי גרי”ז על יומא page 26-27 who says a novel difference between a הלכה למשה מסיני and one that was forgotten and restored by עתניאל בן קנז or other Chachamim
Learn חידושי גרי”ז תמורה טז אות ב who explains a difference between תורה לאו בשמים and אין הנביא רשאי לחדש דבר
Note: The difference between יסוד and מנהג נביאים that Rashi gives.
The Gemara concludes כאן במקדש כאן בגבולין
See how Rashi explains this answer
According to Rashi the נביאים set up the taking of Aravos outside the Beis Hamikdash.
Was this for all seven days of Sukkos or just the last day – Hoshana Rabbah?
Major Question:
The Gemara on מד says that the taking of Aravos on Hoshana Rabbah is זכר למקדש.
But the gemara now says it was a either a יסוד and מנהג נביאים?
See רבינו חננאל (on side of the Gemara) for a different explanation than Rashi
Learn רמב״ם הלכות לולב פרק ז הלכה כא-כב and מגיד משנה
How could ר’ אבהו answer the contradiction of whether Aravah is a יסוד נביאים or הלכה למשה מסיני when the Gemara Temura clearly says one can not ask through prophecy to be taught forgotten halachos?
Learn חידושי גרי”ז על יומא page 26-27 who says a novel difference between a הלכה למשה מסיני and one that was forgotten and restored by עתניאל בן קנז or other Chachamim
Learn חידושי גרי”ז תמורה טז אות ב who explains a difference between תורה לאו בשמים and אין הנביא רשאי לחדש דבר
Note: The difference between יסוד and מנהג נביאים that Rashi gives.
The Gemara concludes כאן במקדש כאן בגבולין
See how Rashi explains this answer
According to Rashi the נביאים set up the taking of Aravos outside the Beis Hamikdash.
Was this for all seven days of Sukkos or just the last day – Hoshana Rabbah?
Major Question:
The Gemara on מד says that the taking of Aravos on Hoshana Rabbah is זכר למקדש.
But the gemara now says it was a either a יסוד and מנהג נביאים?
See רבינו חננאל (on side of the Gemara) for a different explanation than Rashi
Learn רמב״ם הלכות לולב פרק ז הלכה כא-כב and מגיד משנה
