Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim’s Shiur Wednesday Night, August 10th, 2011

[popup url=”http://www.torahanytime.com/scripts/media.php?file=media/Rabbi/Baruch_Bodenheim/2011-08-10/Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Conclusion_of_Yeush_Shelo_Midaas_Giving_Up_Without_Knowledge_Shiur_2/Rabbi__Baruch_Bodenheim__Tractate_Bava_Metzia_Eilu_Metzios_22B_Conclusion_of_Yeush_Shelo_Midaas_Giving_Up_Without_Knowledge_Shiur_2__2011-08-10.wmv”]Tractate Bava Metzia Eilu Metzios 22B Conclusion of Yeush Shelo Midaas Giving Up Without Knowledge Shiur 2[/popup]

What is a practical Halachic difference between the 2 reasons we explained for the law that one may keep a lost item by Zuta Shel Yam even if it has a siman? How does Rava answer the proof against him from Zuta Shel Yam (See Tosfos Tiyuvta)
Learn Gem 22b “Hilchasa Kavasai KAbayei .. until the 2 dots. Why is the Gemara predicating the question on the fact that we just refuted Rav? (Learn Rashi “Heichi .., Tosfos “Meiacher”) Why do they argue? Question of the week; If the reason one may keep a lost item by Zuta Shel Yam even if it has a siman is because of Yiush (Opinion of Rashi) How do we know that the owner is aware that is was swept away, and if he is not aware how can the finder keep it according to Abayei who holds Yiush Shelo Midaas Lo Havai Yiush?