Rabbi Baruch Bodenheim: Gemara Shabbos: Muktza Wednesday night shiur, Elul 28, Daf 44a (09/09/26)
Major Question:
What is the reasoning of מיגו דאתקצאי?
We learnt the אפיקי ים חלק ב ס’ יט (first two paragraphs) the source is “והכינו” an item has to be prepared for use for Shabbos. If it was not prepared before Shabbos than it is Muktzah
(See Monday email for the attachment of the copy of the אפיקי ים)
Why does ר”ש not hold of – מיגו דאתקצאי?
We learnt the אפיקי ים חלק ב ס’ יט – (page רד bottom of the right column “והנה” for an incredible explanation) who gives two options
1. Either ר”ש does not agree to the requirement that an item needs to be prepared for Shabbos
2. He agrees to והכינו however in a case where the person is anticipating using it on Shabbos although it might be off limits at the beginning of Shabbos it is considered prepared.
The Gemara brought two opinions in regards to a large container of oil if ר”ש agrees that it is muktza even after the flame goes out.
What is the explanation for their argument?
Learn אפיקי ים חלק ב ס’ יט – (page רד bottom of the left column “ומה נעים” for an incredible explanation.
Learn רשב”א חולין דף טו.https://hebrewbooks.org/
Learn חזון איש ס’ מא אות ד for a different explanation than the אפיקי ים
https://hebrewbooks.org/
