Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Review Mishna דף לט and the Gemara until דף לט: “מתיב רב ששת (third line from top of the Amud)
Question:
Can the prohibition of doing commerce with fruits of shmitta be circumvented with selling the fruits בהבלעה?
See שפת אמת “וליתיב
Learn תוספות “שאין
And תוספות “יותר
See פני יהושע and שפת אמת who have big dispute whether the extra money paid for the Esrog sold for a mitzvah more than the cost of the Esrog if we’re to be sold as a fruit has kedushas shviis
Learn תוספות “מעות
Continue learning the Gemara דף לט”: “מתיב רב ששת until “אי הכי לולב נמי ”
Learn תוספות “בד”א
Question:
In conclusion of the Gemara would it be permissable to purchase an Esrog during shmita year from an Am Haaretz for less than the price of 3 meals?
The Rambam introduces the prohibition of purchasing fruits during shmita from an Am Haaretz with the prohibition of doing business or guarding fruits during shmita year.
How are these prohibitions connected?
If one is prohibited from purchasing any fruit that is normally guarded from an Am Haaretz as we are concerned he will not be careful to use the money with kedushas sheviis so why is it permissible to purchase a wild growing herb from him, we should have the same concern regarding what he will do with the money from the sale?
Very quickly review the גמרא דף ז. “ומסיים (four lines from bottom of the Amud) until the end of דף ז עמוד ב
Questions:
What are the two points how the ruling of רב in the case of מבוי שנפרץ במלואו לחצר ונפרצה חצר כנגדו contradict the ruling of רב יהודה in the case of מבוי שכלה לרחבה?
How does רב ששת resolve the contradiction?
What would need to be done to permit one to carry inside the מבוי?
Continue learning the גמרא דף ח. “ולמאי דסליק (top of the Amud) until “אמר רבה (seven lines from top of the Amud)
Question:
How does נראה מבחוץ ושוה מבפנים help to permit carrying inside the מבוי?
Click on Right Side of Player to Download the Shiur
Review Mishna דף לט and the Gemara until דף לט: “מתיב רב ששת (third line from top of the Amud)
Question:
Can the prohibition of doing commerce with fruits of shmitta be circumvented with selling the fruits בהבלעה?
See שפת אמת “וליתיב
Learn תוספות “שאין
And תוספות “יותר
See פני יהושע and שפת אמת who have big dispute whether the extra money paid for the Esrog sold for a mitzvah more than the cost of the Esrog if we’re to be sold as a fruit has kedushas shviis
Learn תוספות “מעות
Continue learning the Gemara דף לט”: “מתיב רב ששת until “אי הכי לולב נמי ”
Learn תוספות “בד”א
Question:
In conclusion of the Gemara would it be permissable to purchase an Esrog during shmita year from an Am Haaretz for less than the price of 3 meals?
The Rambam introduces the prohibition of purchasing fruits during shmita from an Am Haaretz with the prohibition of doing business or guarding fruits during shmita year.
How are these prohibitions connected?
If one is prohibited from purchasing any fruit that is normally guarded from an Am Haaretz as we are concerned he will not be careful to use the money with kedushas sheviis so why is it permissible to purchase a wild growing herb from him, we should have the same concern regarding what he will do with the money from the sale?
Review the גמרא דף ז. “ומסיים (four lines from bottom of the Amud) until the end of דף ז עמוד ב
How is the case of מבוי שכלה לרחבה similar to the case of מבוי שנפרץ במלואו לחצר ונפרצה חצר כנגדו?
Questions:
In the case of מבוי שכלה לרחבה why does רב יהודה rule that it is permitted to carry inside the מבוי with just the placement of a Lechi or Korah at the entrance of the מבוי to reshus Harbim?
What would need to be done to permit one to carry inside the מבוי?
Why is it permitted to carry inside the רחבה even though it is open to the Reshus Harabim?
In the case of מבוי שנפרץ במלואו לחצר ונפרצה חצר כנגדו why does רב rule that it is forbidden to carry inside the מבוי?
Why does he rule that it is permitted to carry inside the חצר even though it is open to the Reshus Harabim?
What are the two points how the ruling of רב in the case of מבוי שנפרץ במלואו לחצר ונפרצה חצר כנגדו contradict the ruling of רב יהודה in the case of מבוי שכלה לרחבה?
How does רב ששת resolve the contradiction?
Continue learning the גמרא דף ח. “ולמאי דסליק (top of the Amud) until “אמר רבה (seven lines from top of the Amud)
Question:
How does נראה מבחוץ ושוה מבפנים help to permit carrying inside the מבוי?
